BLOG DESCRIPTION...................

"THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, OF ITSELF, IS NOT A PHYSICAL ENTITY OR HUMAN GROUP.



IT IS A VACANT OFFICE THAT WE PERMIT ELECTED OFFICIALS TO ENTER AND SIT IN TEMPOARILY, TO HONORABLY AND DEMOCRATICALLY CONDUCT THE MAINTENENCE OF THE TREASURY ACCOUNTING, LEDGISLATIVE AND JUDICIARY FUNCTIONS, ACCORDING TO OUR SYSTEMS, AS ESTABLISHED BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION.



THERE IS "NO" AUTHORITY GIVEN TO THE GOVERNMENT, EXCEPT WHAT "THE PEOPLE" PERMIT FOR THEM TO SERVE AT. AND THE PEOPLE MAY DISMISS ANY OR ALL ELECTED OR APPOINTED OFFICIALS, ANYTIME THEY ARE FOUND TO BE FUNCTIONING OUTSIDE THE PARAMETERS, ASSIGNED TO EACH DEPARTMENT, ACCORDING TO THOSE DEPARTMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES.



BUT WE WILL NEVER DISMISS THE OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT "SYSTEM" OF THE U.S., WHICH IS OUR BELOVED "CONSTITUTION", FOR IT ALONE IS WHAT CREATED, MAINTAINS AND PROTECTS OUR FREEDOM."



I GIVE WARNING TO ALL OFFICIALS, THAT THEY SHOULD END THEIR PROGRESSIVE EFFORTS TO ERASE THE TRUTH, OF MY STATEMENTS ABOVE.



I BOLDLY ANNOUNCE REMINDER, OF THESE TRUTHS, TO ALL WHO RESIDE HERE, ASSEMBLED FROM THE ANCESTRY OF EVERY NATION,



TO ALL WHO ARE WELCOMED TO IMMIGRATE HERE AND



TO ALL OUR FUTURE CITIZENS, WHO WILL STILL BE PROTECTED AND ENTITLED TO TOTAL FREEDOM OF ALL "NON-CRIMINAL" CHOICES, OF PRIVACY, OF OPPORTUNITIES AND FREE ENTERPRIZE, OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH, RELIGION, EQUAL RIGHTS, THE RIGHT OF ASSEMBLEDGE, AND THE RIGHT TO BARE ARMS AND SELF DEFEND, WHERE THESE RIGHTS ARE OBSTRUCTED OR VIOLATED.



TO OUR GOVERNMENT I SAY..........STICK TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL SCRIPT AND PUT YOUR CONCERNS ON "OUR OWN", FIRST AND FOREMOST.



RETURN AGAIN, TO "ENFORCING" THE CONSTITUTION AND STOP TRYING TO MINIMIZE ITS PERFECTION AND STOP YOUR PIECE BY PIECE, INDISCREET, ILLEGAL AND MORONIC, ERASING OF IT.



ANY LAW THAT VIOLATES ANY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OR FREEDOMS, CANNOT BE WRITTEN INTO LAW AND IS SELF-NULLIFYING. WE ARE NOT BLIND OR AMUSED. "BAN ALL BANS ! ", "STOP THE ABUSE" ! !- BY DAWN NARET'










Dawn Naret'

Dawn Naret'
also named: Sister Fijer (FJR) in Arabic

"QUOTE THE DAWN.....EVERMORE....."


LET THESE BE THE WORDS AND THE TRUTH OF DAWN NARETS' PHILOSOPHY FOREVER ! !




"TO HEAR OR READ SOMEONE ELSES OPINION, IS PROOF OF ALIVENESS ONLY.....

TO MEMORIZE IT AND TELL OTHERS, IS A SIGN OF APEING ABILITY.....

TO EVALUATE IT AND SLICE OUT THE INACCURACIES OF IT, IS A SIGN OF INTELLIGENCE.....

TO PONDER, RESEARCH, ORGANIZE AND PROVE LOGIC AND THEN CREATE A MORE PERFECT COMPREHENSION, IS GENIUS"....

AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT BY DAWN NARET' MARCH 2008









FIRST ANNIVERSARY MEMORIAL FOR ANOTHER LOST FAMILY MEMBER



Aunt Dawn Naret:
A note of comfort to my family. We lost my brother Charles Collin on Xmas day 2010. My dear ones, We are all suffering invasion on our health. I am thankful that it was a peaceful exit for him and that he did not have to endure years of homelessness or living as an old invalid person. We must be grateful for this and consider it a gift fr...om God, a mercy. Perhaps, because he gave sooooo much protection for his family, he was spared some misery. When we lose a loved one, we cry for our selves. We miss them. This is selfish. We must free them to move ahead to higher planes and duties. Otherwise, they hang with us trying to give us comfort. You will feel a soft feather slide across your cheek.....it is his caress. you will smell a scent of roses.......it is his holy spirit. He is with you now and will always be there looking out for your safety. He had his faults......but he had more goodness than faults. I am sad for his beautiful wife. Please share this with her, to give her comfort as well. I love my brother and I am terribly sad. But I am grateful that he has been blessed to have a peaceful exit. Thank you God. "Only the good die young". I love you all. xoxoxo  aunt dawn naret'

THE ABOVE NOTE OF COMFORT, TO MY FAMILY, WAS POSTED SUNDAY DECEMBER 26, 2010. MY BROTHER CHARLES COLLINS, "CHUCK" HAD DIED ON XMAS MORNING, OF UNCERTAIN CAUSES. WE HAVE HAD MANY DEATHS, CHRONIC AND TERMINAL ILLNESSES, OF "UNCERTAIN CAUSES", IN MY FAMILY, FOR MANY GENERATIONS. IN THIS GENERATION THOUGH, IT HAS INCREASED SUBSTANTUALY, WITH A BLATANT TERRORIZING, THAT MOCKS LEGAL AUTHORITIES TO TRY TO STOP IT.
I WILL ATTEMPT TO COME BACK TO THIS PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENT AND WARNING, WITH MORE SPECIFIC DETAILS, AS THEY EVIDENCE THEMSELVES. BUT, FOR NOW, I JUST FIND IT IMPERATIVE TO GET THIS WARNING AND INFORMATION OUT TO PUBLIC VIEW AND KNOWLEDGE.
ABOUT 2-3 YEARS AGO, MOST OF MY FAMILY JOINED UP AND ALL OPENED ACCOUNTS, AS THEY GOT THE NEWS THAT OTHERS WERE THERE, AND BEGAN TO COMMUNICATE ON FACEBOOK.COM, A SOCIAL INTERNET NETWORK SPACE, WHERE PEOPLE MAY SET UP THEIR OWN SPACE FOR OTHERS TO VIEW PHOTOS, THEY LEAVE, OR TYPE COMMUNICATION OR MESSAGES TO THEM IN BOXES PROVIDED ON THE SITE. IT WAS A VERY PLEASING, SHARING MEANS FOR FRIENDS OR FAMILIES TO STAY IN TOUCH.
THEN EVERYTHING BEGAN TO CHANGE. MESSAGES WERE DISAPPEARING, POSTED PHOTOS WERE DISAPPEARING, AND TEXT BEGAN TO SOUND MORE AND MORE LIKE "GHETTO BOOGIE BABBLE", THAN POSTINGS FROM OUR FAMILY MEMBERS. OUR EMAIL ACCOUNTS WERE BEING TRESPASSED ON, TO THE POINT THAT I NO LONGER EVEN RECEIVED ANY EMAILS, AND MY OUT GOING MAIL WAS OFTEN RESPONDED TO WITH A "COULD NOT DELIVER" MEMO FROM THE MAIL DELIVERY SYSTEM.
I TRIED TO WARN PEOPLE THAT THESE ARE NOT WRITTEN BY THE PEOPLE THAT ARE NAMED ON THE ACCOUNT. THIS WAS MET WITH ACCUSATIONS THAT, "YOU'RE A CRAZY PERSON". ANOTHER SLANDER AND INSULT TO MY INTELIGENCE AND MENTAL STABILITY. WHY ? BY WHOM? MY FAMILY ALWAYS TREATED ME WITH RESPECT ON A PEER LEVEL TO THEMSELVES, BECAUSE I WAS AN HONORABLE LADY AS A 30 YEAR NURSE, BUSNESS MANAGER AND BUSINESS OWNER. I DESERVED AND RECIEVED THEIR RESPECT AND KIND SALUTATIONS, ALL MY LIFE. NOW........A SUDDEN CHANGE. 
I BEGAN TO FEEL THAT I WAS BEING TOTALY BLOCKED FROM HAVING COMMUNICATION ON THE INTERNET. I HAVE A POST OFFICE BOX ALSO, THAT HAD ALREADY FOR YEARS, BEEN PLAGUED WITH DISAPPEARING MAIL. I TRUSTED THE SOURCES WHO TOLD ME IT WAS TRULY SENT.....BUT IT NEVER ARRIVED. ONE OF THE ITEMS WAS THE FINAL "PAID IN FULL" PINK SLIP ON MY VAN, THAT WAS PAID OFF IN FULL, AT THE BANK. THE BANKER RESENT IT 3 TIMES. AND I NEVER GOT IT. 
NOW I HAVE CONCERN THAT I AM NOT RECEIVING FEDERAL HARD MAIL OR INTERNET EMAIL. WHAT CAN I DO ? I COMPLAINED TO THE POSTMASTER AT THE MAIN OFFICE AND GOT NO APOLOGY. JUST A "WHATEVER COMES IS PUT INTO YOUR BOX.". I REQUESTED THE CLERKS, AT THE POST OFFICE, TO PUT A NOTE ON MY BOX, THAT THE MAIL MAY NOT BE HANDED OUT TO ANYONE WHO DOES NOT HAVE A KEY. I AM THE ONLY PERSON WITH A KEY. THE PROBLEMS CONTINUED. SOMEONE WAS GRABBING MY MAIL, BEFORE I RECEIVED IT.
I ALSO BEGAN TO FEEL "OSTRASIZED" BY SOME FAMILY AND FRIENDS, WITHOUT CAUSE. PEOPLE WHO HAD HAD A PLEASANT CONVERSATION WITH ME A FEW DAYS AGO, NOW SEETHED NEGATIVITY AND RESPONDED CURTLY, OR NOT AT ALL, FOR SOME UNKNOWN REASON. I TRIED TO ASK IF I HAD SAID SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT MEANT TO OFFEND THEM, BUT MIGHT HAVE AND THEY REFUSED TO RESPOND. I COULD NOT FIGURE OUT WHAT WAS WRONG. IT WAS HAPPENING AT MY JOB ALSO. ON THE JOB, A SYSTEM OF "GET RID OF THEM WITH A VOLUNTEER QUIT OR PRODUCE WRITE-UPS SHOWING JUST CAUSE FOR TERMINATION" WAS INITIATED. AS A BUSINESS MANAGER, I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THE SYSTEM BUT STILL COULD NOT UNDERSTAND BY WHOM OR WHY IT WAS BEING INITIATED AGAINST ME. I HUNG IN THERE, FIGHTING IT. DOING DEFENSIVE DOCUMENTATION, WHERE YOU CAN SHOW YOU DID EVERYTHING CORRECTLY AND ACCORDING TO COMPANY STANDARDS ETC., I DID EXTRA WORK AND ORGANIZING OF MY DEPARTMENT, I REPORTED ANY DISCREPANCIES TO MY SUPERVISOR. I HELPED MY CO-WORKERS AND PICKED UP AND FINISHED WHAT THEY DID NOT HAVE TIME TO GET TO, I WAS AN EXCELLENT MODEL EMPLOYEE. BUT THE WRITE-UPS BEGAN, WITH FABRICATED RIDICULOUS EXCUSES THAT WERE NOT EVEN IN VIOLATION OF COMPANY POLICY. WHEN YOU DON'T DO ANYTHING WRONG......BUT THEY WANT TO GET RID OF YOU ANYWAY......THEY JUST FABRICATE DISAPLINARY NEEDS. THEY COULD JUST TERMINATE THOSE INCLUDED ON A DOWN-SIZE LIST OR EVEN A HIT LIST......BUT THEY WOULD HAVE TO PAY UNEMPLOYMENT TO THEM. SO THEY TRY TO AQUIRE THE VOLUNTEER QUIT OR WRITE-UP TERMINATION SYSTEM. I LOST SEVERAL JOBS IN THE SAME PATTERN AND STILL DID NOT KNOW WHO THE ENEMY WAS, WHO WAS INITIATING THIS.
MY LIFE BECAME FINANCIALY CHAOTIC, WITH MISSED PAYMENTS, FOLLOWED BY DOUBLE PAYMENTS, FOLLOWED BY THE INTEREST AMOUNT "ONLY" PAYMENTS AS DESPERATION EFFORTS TO RETAIN MY ACCOUNTS AND CREDIT STANDING OF AAA.
I FELL INTO THE COMMON ATTEMPTS OF "ROBBING PETER TO PAY PAUL" AND MANAGED TO KEEP IT GOING A FEW YEARS, UNBELIEVABLY BY WORKING 2 AND 3 PART-TIME JOBS, RUNNING A FLEA MARKET STAND AND ACCEPTING EVERY NEW CREDIT CARD OFFER THAT ALLOWED ME TO PAY OFF THE OLD CARD AND RUN IT ALL THROUGH THIS NEW COMPANY WITH A STARTING "NO DELINQUINCY", "ACCOUNT IN GOOD STANDING" STATUS. 
THEN, THE BOTTOM FELL OUT. I BECAME HOMELESS, THROUGH A NON-PAYMENT OF RENT EVICTION, I LIVED IN MY VARIOUS VEHICLES FOR 7 YEARS, TIL MY VAN BROKE DOWN AND I COULD NOT AFFORD TO GET IT OFF PRIVATE PROPERTY. THEY TOWED IT AND IMPOUNDED IT....BUT DID NOT FIX IT, SO IT NEVER RAN AGAIN AND I WAS FORCED TO SIGN OVER THE PINK-SLIP TO THE IMPOUNDING GARAGE.
THAT'S BASICALLY THE FORMULA AND SAD TRUTH OF HOW HONORABLE, TAX-PAYING CITIZENS ARE BEING SABOTAGED, WITH SLANDER AND VICTIMIZED. THIS IS RESULTING IN THEM BECOMING THE PEOPLE, WHO ARE "THE  HOMELESS PEOPLE" OF TODAY. THEY ARE NOT DRUG ADDICTS, ALCHOHOLICS, PROSTITUTES OR PSYCHIATRIC NUT-CASES. GRANTED, THOSE PEOPLE "WITH REHABILITATIVE ISSUES", DO EXIST AND SOME ARE ALSO "HOMELESS". BUT, THE "VICTIMIZED HOMELESS", THOSE WHO ARE THROWN INTO THIS ARENA OF FINANCIAL CRISIS, THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN, SHOULD NEVER BE ALSO THROWN INTO THE STERIO-TYPICAL CHARACTER ASSUMPTION OF THOSE HAVING "REHABILITATIVE ISSUES". THEY DO NOT NEED ANY REHAB OF ANYTHING, EXCEPT TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE CONTINUED "VICTIMIZATION" THAT STALKS THEM.  
NOW, THIS VICTIMIZATION IS A CRIMINAL ACT. NUMBER ONE......IT HAS TO BE RECOGNIZED AS A FACT OF TRUTH, THAT THE INITIATIONS OF THESE JOB SABOTAGES, ARE AN INTENTIONAL ACT OF FRAUD, DECEIT AND PERSONAL CHARACTER ASSASSINATION,  THAT RESULTS IN JOB LOSS AND PROGRESSIVE FINANCIAL CRISIS FOR THE VICTIM.
THE NEGATIVE EMPLOYEE RECORD, THE PUBLIC COURT PROCESS OF EVICTION, THE LOSS OF GOOD HOUSING REFERENCES, THE LOWERING OF CREDIT RATING, ALL COMBINE TO CREATE A PTI OF POLITICAL PREJUDICE, THAT PROHIBITS ONE FROM SIMPLY PULLING UP THEIR BOOT STRAPS AND GETTING LIFE BACK TO NORMAL.
THE CREDIT RATING SABOTAGE ESPECIALLY, IS MOST HARMFUL. IT IS ILLEGALLY REQUIRED NOW FOR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING APPLICATIONS. THE FUNCTION, OF THE CREDIT REPORTING COMPANIES, WAS NEVER INCLUSIVE OF THIS KIND OF POWER, CONTROL AND AUTHORITY OVER THE FEASIBILITY OF CITIZENS TO HAVE NORMAL AND FAIR OPPORTUNITY TO ACCESS THE AMERICAN DREAM. WHO GAVE THEM THIS AUTHORITY ? WHY IS A LANDLORD OR POTENTIAL EMPLOYER PERMITTED ACCESS TO THESE PRIVATE FINANCIAL FILES ? THERE IS NO LEGAL EXCUSE FOR THIS INFORMATION TO BE RELEASED TO ANYONE, EXCEPT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION WHERE THERE COULD BE A FINANCIAL LOSS TO THE INSTITUTION, IF PREVIOUS PAYING PRACTICES WERE NOT AVAILABLE TO EVALUATE, TO PROTECT THEM FROM SUFFERING A FINANCIAL LOSS.
A LANDLORD HAS NO RIGHT TO THE INFORMATION, BECAUSE HE WILL SUFFER NO FINANCIAL LOSS. THERE IS NO ASSET BEING PUT FORTH BY HIM, EXCEPT THE PROPERTY, THAT HE AGREES TO RELINQUISH HABITATION OF, IN EXCHANGE FOR CASH BY THE MONTH. IN ANY MONTH, THAT HE DOES NOT RECEIVE THE CASH, THER IS THE EVICTION PROCESS LAWS AVAILABLE TO HIM. HE HAS NO RIGHT TO CREDIT STANDING FILES.
A POTENTIAL EMPLOYER HAS NO RIGHT TO THE INFORMATION, BECAUSE HE PUTS FORTH NO ASSETS THAT HE COULD SUFFER LOSS OF. THE APPLICANT IS HIS HUMAN RESOURCE ASSET, THAT HE AQUIRES IN EXCHANGE FOR A CASH SALARY AND AGREEMENT OF LABOR TO BE CONTRIBUTED PER SE. IF THERE IS A BREACH OF CONTRACT IN THIS EXCHANGE, HE CAN TERMINATE THE APPLICANT. HE HAS NO RIGHT TO CREDIT STANDING FILES. 
BUT, THESE COMPANIES CONTINUE TO VIOLATE THE NATURE AND PRIVACY OF THEIR FUNCTION, WHICH HAS BEEN RESULTING IN CONTINUED REJECTION OF EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING. THIESE ARE ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATIONS. THE PROCESS MUST BE ENFORCED WITH OBLIGATION TO ORIGINAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY, STANDARDS OF FUNCTION. THUS WE NOW HAVE "CHRONIC HOMELESSNESS" THAT CAN LAST FOR YEARS......EVEN IF THE STALKERS GIVE UP AND LEAVE THEM ALONE. THEIR PUBLIC RECORDS HAVE BEEN DESTROYED TOO FAR BEYOND SIMPLE PERSERVERENCE SOLUTIONS.
I HAVE BEEN HOMELESS 13 YEARS AND DID GET COMPLETELY BACK TO NORMAL FOR ONE AND A HALF YEARS.  I SPENT MY ENTIRE INCOME, AS A CHARGE NURSE, ON A BEAUTIFUL HOME WITH A CLASSIC TASTEFUL, QUALITY DECOR. THEN THE "STALKERS" CAME BACK AND DESTROYED IT AGAIN.
I HAVE WITNESSED THIS PATTERN REPEATEDLY WITH OTHER PEOPLE AND HAVE BEEN TRACKING IT HAPPENING TO MY OWN FAMILY, IN A MUSH-ROOMING, SPREADING CANCER-LIKE CONTAGIAN, TO MY COUSINS, THEIR CHILDREN AND THEIR FRIENDS. THIS IS A GLOBAL, TREASONISTIC, TERRORISTIC, STALKING AND GENOCIDAL PROCESS. IT MOCKS AND CHALLENGES LEGAL AUTHORITIES TO STOP IT. IT USES AND MANIPULATES THEM TO DO ADDITIONAL VICTIMIZATION, BY CALLING IN FALSE COMPLAINTS AND PROVIDING FALSE WITNESS AGAINST THESE VICTIMS, IN ORDER TO CREATE A "CRIMINAL RECORD" AGAINST THEM, TO FURTHER BLOCK AND OBSTRUCT THEIR RECOVERY FROM HOMELESSNESS. 
THEY CREATE "SUBTITTUTE" TWINS, OF THE VICTIMS, TO DO ACTIVITY THAT THE VICTIM DOES NOT DO, BUT WILL BE ACCUSSED OF, WITH VIDEO OR PHOTOS OR FALSE CONFESSION OF THE TWIN, IN ORDER TO FURTHER MANIPULATE POLICE INTO DOING THEIR DIRTY WORK THAT WILL TOTALLY "OSTRASIZE" THE VICTIM AND POSSIBLY SEND THEM TO PRISON. AT LEAST GIVE THEM A POLICE RECORD THAT WILL FURTHER BLOCK THEIR ACCEPTANCE OF EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING WITH DEMANDED CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS. DO YOU SEE THE SINISTER PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION AND TOTAL DETACHMENT AND BANISHMENT, FROM CIVILIZED SOCIETY, THAT IS THEIR GOAL ?
I HAVE TRIED DESPERATELY TO WARN MY FAMILY OF THESE DANGERS AND THESE PATTERNS.    THIS WAS MET WITH ACCUSATIONS THAT, "YOU'RE A CRAZY PERSON". ANOTHER SLANDER AND INSULT TO MY INTELIGENCE AND MENTAL STABILITY. WHY ? BY WHOM? MY FAMILY ALWAYS TREATED ME WITH RESPECT ON A PEER LEVEL TO THEMSELVES, BECAUSE I WAS AN HONORABLE LADY AS A 30 YEAR NURSE, BUSNESS MANAGER AND BUSINESS OWNER. I DESERVED AND RECIEVED THEIR RESPECT AND KIND SALUTATIONS, ALL MY LIFE. NOW........A SUDDEN CHANGE. THE CHANGE HAS BEEN SO REPEATED, INAPPROPRIATE, DENIED EVEN WHEN I PRESENT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, THAT I AM NOW ALSO WONDERING..........WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE, THAT REJECT CONCERN AND EVEN PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AND HAVE GONE SO FAR AS TO BEGIN A SLANDER CAMPAIGN AGAINST ME AND OTHER FAMILY MEMBERS, INCLUDING MY DECEASED BROTHER, CHARLES COLLINS, WITH UGLY FICTIONAL ACCUSATIONS, SPIT OUT ON ANNOUNCEMENT OF HIS DEATH ? I HAVE TO REJECT SUCH VULGAR, INCOMPASSIONATE SLANDERING AS COMING FROM SOMEONE WHO WAS NEVER A BLOOD-PART OF THIS FAMILY. MY FAMILY ALWAYS RESPECTED MY OPINIONS AND WOULD ASK WHAT I THINK WE COULD DO TO PROTECT OURSELVES.  
I HAVE SEVERAL RELATIVES, I AM MOST CONCERNED ABOUT. IT SEEMS THEY HAVE BECOME VICTIMS. ONE, IS ONE OF SEVERAL OF MY NEICES, THAT SEEM TO BE IN DANGER. THIS ONE, ANGIE, HAS A  FACEBOOK.COM ACCOUNT, THAT HAS NOT BEEN TEXTED ON, BY HER FOR MONTHS. THE ONLY ACTIVITY, WAS ANNOUNCEMENTS OF HER PROGRESS ON COMPUTER GAMES. THEN, I NOTICED THAT THE GAMES WERE NO LONGER FEMININE OR EVEN GAMBLING, BUT VIOLENT MASCULINE TYPES OF WAR AND BATTLE AND WORLD DOMINATION, THAT COULD NOT BE AN INTEREST OF HER. THEIR HAD TO BE A MALE USING HER ACCOUNT. I HAVE BEEN WATCHING AND TODAY, GOT THE EVIDENCE, THAT HER ACCOUNT HAS BEEN TRESPASSED INTO AND A MAN MOCKINGLY CONFESSES IT. 
WHAT CONCERNS ME MOST IS THAT NUMBER ONE, MY FAMILY HAS NO CONCERN AND DENIES IMPOSTERS AND TRESPASSERS AND NUMBER TWO, I HAVE WATCHED THESE PATTERNS AND REALIZE THAT THEY FIRST TRESPASS TO STEAL YOUR MESSAGES AND EMAIL. THEN THEY START SEARCHING FOR ACCOUNT NUMBERS AND PERSONAL INFORMATION TO SELL IDENTITIES. THEN THEY BEGIN TO USE YOUR ACCOUNT TO IMPOSTER YOU TO COMMUNICATE WITH OTHER PEOPLE WHO THINK THEY ARE COMMUNICATING WITH YOU.  THEY GRADUALLY "OSTRASIZE" EVERYONE FROM YOU, WITH INSULTING DIALOG AND ISOLATE THE VICTIM TO HAVING ONLY A FEW PEOPLE THAT WILL TALK TO THEM.......IT IS THE TRESPASSERS. THEY TOTALLY SURROUND THE VICTIM, HAVE ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGE OF EVERY STEP THEY MAKE, CALL AND CANCEL APPOINTMENTS, THAT THE VICTIM WANTED TO ATTEND, IMPOSTER THE VICTIM AND BOMBARD OTHERS WITH BABBLING MULTIPLE MESSAGES, UNTIL THE VICTIM IS PLACED ON A DO NOT ACCEPT LIST, ETC., ETC., ETC.
I WILL ADD MORE ONTO THIS BUT THIS IS BEING PUBLISHED TODAY.
HERE IS THE EVIDENCE OF TRESPASSING THAT ATTEMPTS TO APPEAR THAT ANGIE IS TALKING TO HERSELF, AND MOVES FROM GRIEVING OVER THE DEATH OF MY BROTHER, TO A "GHETTO BOOGIE BABBLING", THAT I HAVE FOUND COMMON AND MOST FRIGHTENING. THERE ARE SEVERAL EPISODES OF MY RELATIVES HAVING THEIR ACCOUNTS TRESPASSED ON AND THEIR PHOTO REPLACED, BY A PHOTO OF A BLACK PERSON. THIS IS THE GROUND WORK FOR IDENTITY THEFT.  
 DECEMBER 27, 2010 ACTUAL FACEBOOK.COM PRINT OUT OF A TRESSPASSERS DIALOGUE, ON THE ACCOUNT OF A. B. :

A. B:i am having a hard time dealing with this. it could have been anyone in my family but not my unc.13 hours ago ·LikeUnlike · Comment
A. B.: You are not the only one.Going thru what your going thru you know what I'm saying? I don't give a (explative) what position you find yourself in.Just find security knowing somewhere else someone is going thru the same struggles you are right now and it's probably me. I remember December middle of a bitter winter. Ass on the trunk feet swinging by the fender. Arguing with you in the freezing cold.I was wrong you aint have to leave me though,Out here (EXPLATIVE...ed) up all alone And what I really wanna say is come on come back. But I got this load on me. Couldn't be worse than when my ninny died or my main homie went to jail on me. Hold me unc standing in front of your house.Tears trickle off my cheek and onto your shirt And I realize now that once your gone.I'ma truly know the meaning ah being alone when I'm...Allll allone, I don't even care which way I go. I'm just following my radioAllll allone, I don't even care which way I go.I'm just following my radio13 hours ago · LikeUnlike
Alicia L.-  huggs ♥12 hours ago · LikeUnlike

DjLucky Luccianno - Hey BabyGurl your not alone.12 hours ago via Facebook Mobile · LikeUnlike
A. B. -  i know i always have you guys12 hours ago · LikeUnlike · 1 personDjLucky Luccianno likes this.
DjLucky Luccianno - It's all good homie you kno ya D.j. has got luv for ya!12 hours ago via Facebook Mobile · Like Unlike

Nita M. - nice nice10 hours ago · LikeUnlike
Dawn Naret ALL OF THE ABOVE TEXT IS BY AN IMPOSTER ! SEE THIS PROOF:
A. B.:Hey A....! You have Officially been Hackd! Guess Who! It's your Fav D.J. In the world lmao D.j.Lucky of Luccianno Entertainment! Hit me up when you see this ha haaa!!...16 hours ago via Mobile Web ·LikeUnlike · Comment
Dawn Naret: HOW BOUT "I" HIT YOU UP YOU S.O.B. ! ! I HATE CRIMINALS AND IMPOSTERS ! GET OUT OF HER SITE !

OK................."NOW" TELL ME MY FAMILY IS NOT BEING STALKED BY IMPOSTERS ! WAKE WTF UP ! !30 minutes ago · LikeUnlikeWrite a comment...
ARTICLE BY DAWN NARET'reply2dn@gmail.com



"THE AMERICAN TALIBAN AND AL-QUAEDA BANNED IN AFGHANISTAN", BY DAWN NARET'




FROM THE WALL STREET JOURNAL OCTOBER 25, 2010:

"Karzai Stands By Private Security Ban" - WSJ.com

online.wsj.com

"Afghan President Hamid Karzai is standing by his decree to dissolve private security companies, although a delegation of Western diplomats warned Sunday that aid and development money could be affected........"

I WARNED, ABOUT A SEGMENT OF AMERICANWHO HAVE BEEN HIRING THEMSELVES OUT GLOBALLY, AS MERCENARIES AND PRIVATE SECURITY GUARDS. THE SECURITY IS THEIR FRONT. ONCE THEY GET INSIDE THE COUNTRY, THEY PROFITEER AND EVEN ATTEMPT TO TAKE OVER THE GOVERNMENTS.

IRAQ EVICTED AN AMERICAN SECURITY GROUP, FOR KILLING AND LOOTING ...IRAQI CIVILIANS. NOW, AFGHANISTAN IS BANNING THEM FOR "CAUSING CITIZEN CAUSUALTIES AND CORRUPTION".



THIS IS THE GROUP I WARNED ABOUT, THAT IS FUNCTIONING IN AMERICA. THEY ARE THEREFORE ANTI-AMERICAN AND WILLING TO CAUSE CASUALTIES TO AMERICAN CITIZENS AS WELL. THEY ARE SWARMING NEIGHBORHOODS WITH INTIMIDATION AND TAKING OVER BUSINESSES AND RESIDENCES. THEY FABRICATE LIES OF SLANDER AGAINST HOME OWNERS AND BUSINESS OWNERS, IN AN ATTEMPT TO SCARE THEM AWAY WITH EMBARRASSMENT AND THEY BLACKMAIL THEM AS WELL. THEY HAVE SLANDERED AND BLACKMAILED POLITICIANS AND GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. THEN THEY TAKE THEIR JOB POSITIONS OR PUT IN A LOOK ALIKE TO INFILTRATE THE GOVERNMENT.

I HAVE WARNED ABOUT THESE SUBSTITUTIONS AND POSTED MANY PHOTOS OF DIFFERENT LADIES IMPOSTERING MS. CONDOLIZZA RICE, DURING HER DUTY AS SECRETARY OF STATE. ONE OF THESE IMPOSTERS WAS SEEN IN A PHOTO LAST WEEK WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA.

THESE ARE EXTREMELY MILITANT PEOPLE. THEY ARE ANTI-AMERICAN TRAITORS. THEY ARE THE "TALIBAN AND THE AL-QUAEDA" THAT HAS BEEN SO ELUSIVE TO AMERICAN GOVERNMENT, BECAUSE THEY REFUSE TO ACCEPT THAT THESE AMERICANS ARE NO LONGER UNDER THEIR CONTROL, BUT HAVE AMASSED THEMSELVES IN AND AMONG ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE INDEPENDANT OF AMERICAN CONTROL.

THEY ARE NOT WORKING UNDER-COVER.....THEY ARE FULLY JOINED, LOYAL AND DIRTY.

I AM ALSO CONCERNED THAT THE U.S. IS NOT SUPPORTING PRESIDENT KARZAI, IN HIS DECISION TO EVICT THESE PEOPLE FROM HIS COUNTRY. THIS IS ANOTHER MANIPULATED ATTITUDE, THE SAME AS THEIR NEGATIVE INTENTIONS TOWARD IRAN. WHEN WILL THEY STOP LISTENING TO DECEIVERS, WHO SEEK TO OVER-THROW THEM ?



I AM TIRED OF BEING A VICTIMIZED AMERICAN CITIZEN BECAUSE OF THESE PEOPLE. THEY ARE CONDUCTING CORRUPTION EVERYWHERE. THEIR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND TRESPASSES, ESPECIALLY ON THE INTERNET, ARE INEXCUSABLE, ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL AND ANTI-AMERICAN. THE ARTICLE ON KARZAI IS SEARCHABLE AT THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, OCT. 25, KARZAI BAN ON SECURITY. - MS. RICE PHOTOS ARE VIEWABLE AT: http://www.authordawnnaret.blogspot.com

THIS IS A TAMPERED WITH STATE DEPT. PHOTO THAT HAS BEEN PLACED IN MY FILE

THIS IS A TAMPERED WITH STATE DEPT. PHOTO THAT HAS BEEN PLACED IN MY FILE
THE REAL ORIGINAL PHOTO OF CONDOLLEEZZA, THAT WAS HERE, HAD A THIN SKINNED NOSE, WIDER AND FLATTER, A BIT LONGER HAIR, WAS YOUNGER AND BRIGHTER IN SMILE.

IMPOSTER SEEN WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA LAST WEEK

IMPOSTER SEEN WITH PRESIDENT OBAMA LAST WEEK

ANOTHER IMPOSTER

ANOTHER IMPOSTER

RE-PUBLISHING: "ISRAEL....THE THORN IN THE RIB OF THE WORLD", BY DAWN NARET'

OCTOBER 21, 2010 - I HAVE 2 IMPORTANT CONCERNS, ON MY MIND THIS MORNING.



CONCERN #1 - WE MUST MOVE NOW, TO PROTECT THE GOOD, GOD BELIEVING JEWS, CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS, OF THE COUNTRY OF PALESTINE.



ACTIVITIES ARE SWIRLING TO A DANGEROUS LEVEL OF WORLD WAR POSSIBILITY BECAUSE OF THE CARNAGES, CONDUCTED BY THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT AGAINST PALESTINIANS, AGAINST LEBANONESE, AGAINST GAZA STRIP NATIVES AND AGAINST NATIVE RESIDENTS OF EVERY COUNTRY WHERE THEY HAVE ESTABLISHED THEIR... PRESENCE.



THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT IS NOT COMPRISED OF THE GOOD BELIEVING JEWS, WHO OBEY THE LAWS OF THE GOD OF ABRAHAM. THEY ARE COMPRISED OF NON-BELIEVERS, PAGANS, ANTI-CHRIST TYPES OF ANCIENT TIMES, WHO HAVE BEEN IMPOSTERING THE GOOD JEWS AND USING THEIR PIETY AND DEVOTION AS A FACADE TO GAIN APPROVAL AND FUNDING FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD.



THEY HAVE NOW ENDANGERED THESE GOOD JEWS, WHOM THEY HAVE HELD UP AS THEIR "POSTER-BOYS" AND HAVE EXPLOITED FOR PROFIT AND POWER. WHILE IMPOSTERING THE GOOD JEWS, THEY HAVE COMMITTED EXTREME CARNAGE AGAINST EVERY POPULATION, WHERE THEY HAVE INFILTRATED AND SET UP PREPARATIONS FOR SEIZURE OF GOVERNMENTS.



ISRAEL IS "THE" THORN IN THE RIB OF THE WORLD.



BELIEVING JEWS HAVE BEGUN PACKING THEIR FAMILIES AND MIGRATING OUT OF ISRAEL. BUT THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOT ALLOWED MOST OF THEM TO LIVE AS PROSPEROUS PEOPLE, AND THEY LACK FUNDS TO DO THIS EASILY. MOST OF THEM WERE ENSLAVED TO LIVE ON "KUBUTZES" A COMMUNIST-TYPE COMMUNAL FARM, WHERE THEY HAD ROOM AND BOARD IN TRADE FOR FARM LABOR. THEY HAVE DETESTED THE CARNAGES AGAINST THE PALESTINIANS AND HAVE DESIRED A PEACEFUL ENVIRONMENT FOR THEIR CHILDREN.



THE CHRISTIANS AND THE MUSLIMS NEED IMMEDIATE PROTECTION, AS THEY HAVE NEEDED IT SINCE 1948, WITH NO RESPONSE FROM THE WORLD. WHAT HAVE WE DONE ?



TO HAVE STOOD BY, WHILE THESE DESCENDANTS OF THE ANCIENTS, THE VERY FIRST CHRISTIANS, THE DESCENDANTS OF THE 12 DISCIPLES, THE VERY FIRST "ALREADY BELIEVING", CONVERTS TO ISLAM, WHO RECOGNIZED THE FAMILIAR TRUTH OF GOD, BEING TAUGHT BY PROPHET MOHAMMAD. WHAT HAVE WE DONE?



TO HAVE STOOD BY WATCHING, FOR OVER 60 YEARS, WHILE THESE BELIEVING PIOUS PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SYSTEMATICALLY SLAYED AND ROBBED, BY NON-BELIEVING ANTI-CHRIST, IMPOSTERS OF GOOD JEWS.



I PRAY FOR THE U.N. TO DISSOLVE THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL AND ERASE THIS THORN IN THE RIB OF THE WORLD.



MY SECOND CONCERN IS TRIVIAL NEXT TO THIS MOST VITAL NEED OF IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. WE WERE ALL DECEIVED, BY THESE PAGAN IMPOSTERS OF GOOD JEWS. WE WERE ALL GIVING SUPPORT FOR ISRAEL, WHEN WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WORKING TO GIVE SHELTER AND A PEACEFUL HAVEN, TO ARRIVING IMMIGRANT JEWS, INTO THE FULLY SUPPORTED AND PROTECTED GOVERNMENT OF THE "COUNTRY" OF PALESTINE.



NOW......ALL HAVE SUFFERED GREAT DESTRUCTION.



SATAN DECEIVED US. "IT IS NOT NATIONS OR PRINCIPALITIES, YOU WAR AGAINST....BUT AGAINST THE FORCES OF EVIL".



MAY GOD GIVE US THE SPEED TO EXPIDITE THE DISSOLVING OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL IMMEDIATELY AND MAY GOD GIVE US THE WISDOM TO RECOGNIZE DECEPTION AND MANIPULATION DISGUISED AS GOOD WORKS.



MAY WE EMBRACE THE SURVIVERS, AMONG THE "MULTIPLE" CARNAGES BY ISRAEL AND MAY GOD FORGIVE US OUR WEAKNESSES IN BIBLICAL KNOWLEDGE, IN POLITICAL FAVORTISMS WITH PREJUDICE, IN RECOGNIZING BREACH OF CONTRACT, AND REFUSAL TO ABIDE BY HUMANE RULES OF GOVERNING AND WEAKNESS OF FAITH THAT GUIDES AND DISCERNS EVIL.



HAD WE BEEN ON THE RIGHT PATH OF PRACTICING OUR GODLY FAITH PROPERLY AND SINCERELY, WE MIGHT HAVE REFUSED TO SUPPORT EVIL, JUST BASED ON THE HARM IT WAS RESULTING IN. THERE IS NO EVIL ACT THAT CAN RESULT IN GOODNESS OR COMPASSION.



"BE CAREFUL, WHO YOU LABEL AS YOUR ENEMY.....THEY JUST MIGHT BE THE ONE THAT GOD HAS ASSIGNED TO SAVE YOUR LIFE." - DAWN NARET'

10-21-10- ADD-ON TO "ISRAEL....A THORN IN THE RIB OF THE WORLD"

RE-PUBLISHED 10-21-10 ADD-ON:

ISRAEL HAS BREACHED THE FOUNDATION OF ITS STATEHOOD, WHICH DEMANDED THAT IT WOULD PROTECT THE NON-JEWISH NATIVES, OF ITS REGION "IN" PALESTINE, FROM UNJUST TREATMENT WITH PREJUDICE.
THEY HAVE BEEN SYSTEMATICALLY BEEN COMMITTING CARNAGE AND ILLEGAL SEIZURE OF PROPERTIES, SINCE 1948.

I WITNESSED IT WHEN THE EPIOMY OF DEMONIC BEHAVOUR REVEALED ITSELF, ON INTERNATIONAL BBC T.V., OF THE ISRAELI ARMY SURROUNDING A PALESTINIAN GOVERNMENT BUILDING, THAT HAD IN OCCUPATION CHAIRMAN YASSAR ARAFAT, THE NATIONAL LEADER OF PALESTINE.

I WATCHED FOR MANY DAYS AS THEY SYSTEMATICALLY CUT OFF ALL ACCESS, SUPPLIES, WATER, ELECTRICITY, CONSTANTLY FIRED SHOTS INTO THE BUILDING AND FINALLY BULLDOZED THE BUILDING DOWN..........THEY MURDERED, ON LIVE, INTERNATIONAL BBC T.V., A NATIONAL LEADER OF GOVERNMENT. THIS WAS ENOUGH TO DISSOLVE THE FACADE OF A JEWISH DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.


I WITNESSED EVERY DAY OF THE ASSASSINATION AND CARNAGE. I SAW WITH MY OWN EYES, THE EVIL, DEMONIC BREACH OF CONTRACT AND DENIAL OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS OR SEMBLANCE OF CIVILIZED ORDER BEING DISPLAYED BY AN INSANE, NON-DEMOCRATIC, NON-RELIGIOUS, NON-HUMAN, PAGAN REMNANT, OF THE HARD-LINE COMMUNIST LEADERS, WHO HAVE RULED ISRAEL SINCE 1948 AND USED IT AS THEIR CENTRAL BASE, SINCE THE FALL OF THEIR RULE IN MOSCOW, FOR GLOBAL EXPANSIONS AND TRAVESTIES.


I SCREAMED WITH OUTRAGE, THAT NO ONE LIFTED A FINGER TO HELP. NO ONE ATTEMPTED TO STOP THE MURDER OF A NATIONAL LEADER. AN UNFORGIVABLE ACT OF NEGLECT, BY THE WORLD.


EVERYONE WAS DECEIVED, BY THE SLANDER AND RHETORIC, BEING SEEDED GLOBALLY, AGAINST THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE. THEY WERE FIGHTING FOR THEIR LIVES AND FOR CONTROL OF THEIR OWN COUNTRY ! THE SAME AS WE WOULD DO, IF THE UNITED STATES WERE INVADED OR SEIZED.


NONE OF THEM WERE CRIMINALS OR TERRORISTS ! IT WAS THE ISRAELIS WHO WERE THE INFILTRATORS, INVADERS, SEIZORS, MURDERERS, INSTIGATORS OF ALL DISRUPTION.


ALWAYS ASSULTING THE NATIVES.....INSTIGATING VIOLENT REACTION......THEN ACCUSING THEM OF STARTING TROUBLE. THIS HAS BEEN THE REPEATED PATTERN FOR 60 YEARS. INSTIGATE, ATTACK, DIVERT BLAME, DEMAND PEACE, INSTIGATE AGAIN, ATTACK AGAIN, AND DIVERT BLAME FOR WHY THEY BROKE THEIR WORD AND BREACHED EVERY CEASE FIRE, CEASE ILLEGAL SETTLEMENT EXPANSION, CEASE ILLEGAL IMPRISONING AND EXECUTION OF RESIDENTS. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. - DAWN NARET'

"JESUS WAS A PALESTINIAN ! !

PLEASE VISIT MY FUNNY AND SERIOUS POLITICAL "DUBYA D.C." SITE AT:

http://www.authordawnnaret.blogspot.com/



*** WHILE THERE, PLEASE VIEW MY EYE OPENING EXPOSE' ON THE "COUNTRY" OF PALESTINE, AS TAUGHT TO VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY AND THE U.S. CONGRESS AND SENATE. (POSTED NEAR BOTTOM OF THE "DUBYA D.C" BLOG LOCATED AT LINK ABOVE)

VERY IMPORTANT THOUGHT OF THE DAY.....DID YOU KNOW THAT :

"JESUS WAS A PALESTINIAN !" - SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME, BETHLEHAM AND NAZARETH ARE VILLAGES IN THE COUNTRY OF PALESTINE, PRONOUNCED "PHILISTINE", BY THE BIBLE AND BY THE ARAB SPEAKING PEOPLE.

THERE WAS NO "ISRAEL" UNTIL 1948, WHEN THE INVADERS, OF THE LANDS OF PALESTINE, FINANCED AND PHYSICALLY ARMED AND MANNED BY THE RUSSIAN COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT, CHOSE THE NAME THEMSELVES.

THE SMALL AREA, THAT THE WORLD LEADERS FORCED THE PALESTINIANS TO CEDE TO THE INVADERS, BECAUSE THEY WOULD NOT INTERFERE OR ASSIST, WAS NEVER THE ENTIRE COUNTRY.

THE NAME OF THE COUNTRY HAS NEVER BEEN CHANGED NOR HAVE THE PEOPLE RELINQUISHED THE GOVERNMENT OF THE "COUNTRY" OF PALESTINE.

"HAMAS" WAS NEVER A MILITANT MUSLIM UPRISING.....THEY WERE AND ARE THE ORIGINAL PALISTINIAN RESIDENTS, WHO WERE RESISTING THE ILLEGAL FORCED TAKE-OVER OF THEIR COUNTRY, THE SAME AS ANY AMERICAN WOULD DO IF WE WERE INVADED.

THEIR MEMBERS HAVE ALSO INCLUDED PALESTINIAN CHRISTIANS, WHO ARE THE DECENDANTS OF THE VERY FIRST COMMUNITY OF THE FOLLOWERS OF JESUS CHRIST, FROM BETHLEHAM, PALESTINE AND NAZARETH, PALESTINE.

THESE WERE THE VERY 1ST PEOPLE TO HEAR HIS PREACHING , HIS FAMILY AND NEIGHBORS, WHO ACCEPTED HIM, AS THE PROPHET AND LORD MASTER TEACHER OF THE SECOND COVENNANT.

MANY OF THOSE SAME FIRST CHRISTIANS LATER, AROUND 600 A.D., CONTINUED THEIR STRONG BELIEF AND OBEDIANCE TO THE LAWS, OF THE GOD OF ABRAHAM AND RECOGNIZED THE SPOKEN TRUTHS, THE SIGNS AND THE PROPHECIES OF GOD IN THE TEACHINGS OF MOHAMMAD, PROPHET OF GOD TO THE MUSLIMS.

IT WAS THE ANGEL JIBREEL, (GABREAL), WHO TOLD MARY THAT HER CHILD WOULD BE A BLESSED LEADER (PROPHET).

AND IT WAS THE SAME ANGEL, JIBREEL, WHO VISITED AND TAUGHT THE THIRD COVENANT TO MOHAMMAD (THE HOLY QURAN).

OF THE MANY TRUTHS OF CREATIONISM, SCIENCE (1ST DOCUMENTATION OF ANY INFO ANYWHERE THAT THE HUMAN BODY HAS A CIRCULATORY SYSTEM), MORALS (INCLUDING RESPECT FOR FEMALES WITH THE RIGHT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT A HUSBAND, PROVISION OF ALIMONY AND INHERITANCES FOR WOMAN AND CHILDREN) AND A GUIDANCE FOR A HUMANE, OBEDIANT SOCIETY OF PEACE (ISLAM), THE THIRD COVENANT GAVE PERMISSION TO NOT ALWAYS "TURN THE OTHER CHEEK", BUT TO "SELF DEFEND" WAS GIVEN TO THE BELIEVERS OBEDIANT TO THE LAWS OF THE GOD OF ABRAHAM (ALLAH- CREATOR OF ALL THE COSMOS).

SO MANY FIRST CHRISTIANS CONTINUED THE PATH OF GOD, BY ACCEPTING ISLAM AND THE TEACHINGS OF THE HOLY QURAN, AS GIVEN TO THE PROPHET MOHAMMAD, BY GOD'S ANGEL, JIBREEL.

THE PROPHET MOHAMMAD AND HIS FOLLOWERS WERE ALSO PERSECUTED BY THE JEWS, WHO TRIED TO ASSASSINATE THEM ALL, FROM THE BEGINNING.

THEY WERE ALL, ALWAYS PERSECUTED BY THE JEWS, WHO REJECTED JESUS AND REJECTED THE MUSLIMS. PLEASE LOVE AND PROTECT THE PALESTINIANS ! !

AND... PLEASE LOVE AND PROTECT THE TRUE, BELIEVING JEWS, WHO ARE BEING EXPLOITED AS POSTER CHILDREN, ALL THESE YEARS, BY THE COMMUNISTS'.

THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL, IS NOT SPIRITUAL, THEY DO NOT ABIDE BY THE LAWS OF THE GOD OF ABRAHAM, BUT THESE PEOPLE, WHO MIGRATED THERE, CAME INNOCENTLY AND WITH A FULL HEART OF FAITH, THAT THE GOD OF ABRAHAM WOULD PROTECT THEM.

JESUS NEVER REJECTED THEM, THEIR FAITH, OR THEIR GOD !

HE REJECTED THE HYPOCRYTES (IMPOSTERS) OF THE FAITH AND THE HYPOCRACY OF THE MONEY CHANGERS AND THEIR PRACTICES.

HE BROUGHT THEM THE SECOND COVENNANT FROM GOD, THAT OFFERED ATONEMENT FOR THOSE THAT REJECTED MOSES AND FELL AWAY.

HE OFFERED IT TO ALL HUMANS.

A GUIDANCE ON HOW TO:

LIVE AS HE LIVED, OBEY AS HE OBEYED AND BECOME BLESSED WITH ETERNAL LIFE AS HE HAS BEEN BLESSED.

THE GUIDANCE TAUGHT HOW TO "SAVE YOURSELF", BY REJECTING EVIL.

JESUS WAS NEVER SENT HERE TO DIE FOR OUR SINS OR HIS SINS OR ANYONE ELSES SINS, ELSEWISE.......WHERE IS THE LESSON OR THE EVIDENCE OF FORGIVNESS ? ?

IS THE REWARD OF FORGIVENESS "DEATH" ?

NO ! IT IS ETERNAL "LIFE" !

HE WAS TRYING TO TEACH ALL HUMANS THAT ALL HUMANS MAY ATTAIN ETERNAL LIFE AND FORGIVENESS !

MANY OF THESE JEWS, WHO MIGRATED TO PALESTINE, ARE ALREADY MEMBERS OF NEW MOVEMENTS CALLED "JEWS FOR JESUS".

MANY HAVE A LOVE FOR JESUS.

THEY NEED TO EXTEND THAT LOVE TO THE PALESTINIAN CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS !

IN THE TORAH, GENESIS, ISAAC (2ND AND YOUNGEST SON OF ABRAHAM AND FATHER OF THE JEWISH NATION), WAS FORBIDDEN BY ABRAHAM, TO RESIDE IN GAZA OR MARRY THE DAUGHTERS OF GAZA, POSSIBLY BECAUSE OF HIS MOTHER'S ASSOCIATION WITH KING ABIMOLECH.

ISMAEL (ELDEST SON OF ABRAHAM AND FATHER OF THE ARAB MUSLIM NATION) WAS APPROVED AND MARRIED 3 OF THE DAUGHTERS OF THE KINGS OF PALESTINE AND GAZA. ALL HIS DESCENDANTS LIVED IN PALESTINE AND GAZA, ALL THOSE GENERATIONS AND NEVER WANDERED TO EGYPT OR TRAVELED BEYOND THERE OWN HOME TOWNS, EVEN THOUGH HIS MOTHER WAS HAGAAR THE EGYPTIAN PRINCESS, WHO WAS SENT AS A GIFT OF RESPECT, FROM HER FATHER , TO BE SERVANT AND HANDMAIDEN TO ABRAHAM AND HIS FIRST WIFE, SARAH.

LIKE THE WANDERING TRIBES OF JEWS, WHO WERE HELD CAPTIVE SLAVES BY THE EGYPTIANS AND THEN FOLLOWED MOSES OUT OF EGYPT, DURING THE EXODUS, MOST OF THESE MODERN DAY JEWISH IMMIGRANTS, IN ISRAEL ENDED UP AS SLAVES, WORKING IN THE FIELDS, OF ISRAEL, SUPPLYING THE FOOD FOR THE CITIZENS OF ISRAEL.

THEY ARE NOT IN THEIR "PROMISED LAND".

THEY ARE TOO FAR SOUTH OF IT.

THE HOMELAND OF ABRAHAM WAS IRAQ, MESOPOTAMIA REGION (ALL VERIFIABLE IN GENISIS).

THE NEPHEW OF ABRAHAM WAS LOT. HIS HOME WAS IN SODOM AND GOMMORRAH AREA. IT WAS LOT WHOM THE 3 ANGELS OF GOD VISITED AND WARNED THE PEOPLE TO REJECT THEIR SIN, OR THE REGION WOULD BE DESTROYED. IT WAS THE WIFE OF LOT WHO BECAME THE "PILLAR OF SALT", WHICH I DO BELIEVE MEANS MORE OF, THE "SALT OF THE EARTH", A "PILLAR OF THE COMMUNITY".

THE WANDERING JEWS WERE SHOWN THIS AREA , BUT NOT PERMITTED TO CROSS THE RIVER JORDAN UNTIL THEY STOPPED REBELLING AND ROBBING AND WARRING WITH OTHERS.

THAT HAS BEEN THE HOLD UP OF THEIR FINAL ARRIVAL TO THE "PROMISED LAND".

MANY HAVE ALREADY LEFT ISRAEL AND ARRIVED IN THE U.S.A., STILL REFUGEES AND WITH NO SECURITY.

THEY ARE TRUE JEWS, NOT IMPOSTERS OF JEWS. THEY ARE BELIEVERS IN THE GOD OF ABRAHAM.

THEY ARE NOT THE REBELLIOUS IMPOSTERS OF JEWS, WHO MURDER THE PALESTINIANS AND ROAM THE WORLD INFILTRATING AND IMPOSTERING WHOM THEY SEEK TO CONTROL BY STEALING LANDS AND TAKING OVER GOVERNMENTS, WITH FALSE EXCUSES AND REWRITTEN, FALSE, HISTORICAL AND BIBLICAL FACTS.



"JESUS WAS A PALESTINIAN !" - DAWN NARET'






--WELL, VALENTINE'S DAY IS OVER....SO'S ST. PATTY'S DAY....WHAT DO WE DO NOW?
--JUST DON'T LAND HERE...THERE'S DOG POOP RIGHT UNDER US ! !



***************************************************




QUOTE FROM: "Barefoot Bob Hardison"

FROM HIS MEMORIAL WEB-SITE AT:

http://www.barefootsworld.net/



"WHEN YOU AWAKE, THE DREAM IS GONE......



"WHEN YOU ARE ENLIGHTENED, THE WORLD OF ILLUSION IS GONE......

AND THE TRUTH WILL MAKE YOU FREE......"



"THERE IS NO RELIGION HIGHER THAN TRUTH."
















WHERE IS THE WONDER AND WHAT IS THE ASK ?

WHERE IS THE WONDER AND WHAT IS THE ASK ?
'MOODY BLUES SHOWS YOU THE WONDER - GO TO "KNIGHTS IN WHITE SATIN" - CLICK THIS PHOTO TO VIEW "KNIGHTS" ART WITH MUSIC OF MOODY BLUES !

1967 IN PARIS - MOODY BLUES - "KNIGHTS IN WHITE SATIN"




FOR SEVERAL YEARS NOW, I HAVE BEEN POSTING A PHOTO OF A YOUNG BOY LYING IN THE GRASS, GAZING AT THE CLOUDS, ALONG WITH ONE OF MY SPRING POEMS.

THE CAPTION, OF THE PHOTO HAS BEEN, "WHERE IS THE WONDER AND WHAT IS THE ASK ?"..............WHEN THE FLUTE HITS HIGH C AND THE VOICES SOAR WITH "OH HOW I LOVE YOUUUU", YOU WILL FINALLY COMPREHEND.

THE WONDER IS THE SOARING SENSE OF ALIVENESS YOU FEEL WITH THIS MUSIC. YOU CANNOT GET IT FROM SEX OR MONEY OR POWER OVER OTHERS........THESE CAN ONLY ACHIEVE A VAGUE ESSENCE OF THE FULL AWAKENING AND JOY.

AND WHAT IT IS, IS THE ASK OR THE QUESTION. IT IS THE FULL JOINING, MERGING, MELDING AND UNISON WITH THE OMNIPOTENT POWER OF THE CREATOR, EXPANDED AND MULTIPLIED BY THE FULL COMPLETE INCLUSION OF EVERY CREATION INTO ONE UNIFIED SINGLE BREATHING SPIRIT, PASSION AND SOUL, ALL LIFTING EACH OTHER TOGETHER AND SOARING AT THE SAME TIME............BY DAWN NARET' - I LOVE YOU

CLICK THIS URL LINK TO VIEW :

URL LINK

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9muzyOd4Lh8

HERE'S ANOTHER "KNIGHTS" VERSION WITH ART WITH SOME FABULOUS ART

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v-7rkgm1yGgbm

SLIDE SHOW ! BY DAWN NARET'

GETTIN OLD WIT DA OLD MAN















"HONEY....WHAT YOU NEED, IS A BANANNA SPLIT ! !"







































"MILLIONS TESTED FOR HIV COULD BE "FALSE" - POSITIVE ! !", BY DAWN NARET'



MILLIONS TESTED FOR HIV COULD BE "FALSE"-POSITIVE ! !

THIS IS A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCMENT :

I HAVE BEEN ATTEMPTING TO SPREAD THIS NEWS ONE ON ONE AND ASKING EVERYONE TO VERIFY IT AND PASS IT ON.

BECAUSE I WAS NOT SURE IF ANYONE ACTUALLY LOOKED AT MY BLOG SITES. BUT NOW I DO HAVE MORE FAITH THAT THE SITES ARE TRULY BEING VISITED AND WANT TO STEP UP MY EFFORT TO GET THE TRUTH OUT ! !

IF YOU ARE TESTED FOR HIV YOU SHOULD MAKE SURE THAT THE TESTER ASKS YOU IF YOU HAVE HAD ANY "STEROID" PRODUCTS WITHIN THE LAST 6-12 MONTHS.

IF THEY DO NOT ASK YOU, THEY ARE GUILTY OF NEGLIGENCE AND POSSIBLY PROVIDING A SPECIMEN THAT CAN ONLY RESULT IN A "POSITIVE" TEST RESULT, EVEN IF THE DONOR IS "NEGATIVE" FOR HIV.

THE INFORMATION TO FOLLOW IS SOUND MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION, FOUND IN ANY CURRENT P.D.R. (PHYSICIANS DESK REFERENCE).

LOOK UP "PREDNISONE" A COMMONLY OVER-USED STEROID THERAPY FOR INFLAMMATION.

IN THE SIDE EFFECTS AND THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS SECTION, YOU WILL SEE THAT WARNIMGS ARE ISSUED TO NOTIFY USERS THAT THESE STEROID DRUGS WILL:

SHUT DOWN THE "ISLES OF LANGERHAN" WHICH ARE ESSENTIAL IN THE PRODUCTION OF NATURAL INSULIN.

WITH REDUCED NATURAL INSULIN, THE PATIENT WILL RESULT IN ELEVATED BLOOD SUGARS.

WITH ELEVATED BLOOD SUGARS, THEY WILL ACTUALLY BECOME TEMPORARY DIABETICS, WHILE TAKING THE STEROIDS AND WILL REQUIRE INSULIN INJECTIONS TO TAKE THE PLACE OF THEIR NATURAL LOSS OF NATURAL INSULIN.

SO, THEY WILL TEST "POSITIVE" AS A DIABETIC NEEDING INSULIN THERAPY AND READING HIGH ON THE BLOOD SUGAR COUNTS.

THE STEROID DRUGS ALSO HAVE ANOTHER SIDE EFFECT THAT SHUTS DOWN THE BODYS NATURAL IMMUNE SYSTEM AND GIVES READINGS OF LOW T-CELL COUNTS AND READINGS OF "POSITIVE" HIV TEST RESULTS, WHERE HIV DOES NOT EXIST AND THE PATIENT IS TRULY "NEGATIVE" FOR HIV,
BUT IS HAVING A TEMPORARY SHUT-DOWN OF THEIR IMMUNE SYSTEM. SO THE TEST RESULT WOULD HAVE TO BE CORRECTED TO STATE A "FALSE-POSITIVE" AND NOT A "POSITIVE" RESULT WAS READ AS THE FINDING.

IF A LAB TECHNICIAN, NURSE OR DOCTOR DID NOT ASK YOU IF YOU HAVE HAD STEROIDS IN THE PAST 6-12 MONTHS, THEY ARE NEGLIGENT OF EFFICIENT QUESTIONING AND GUILTY OF DOCUMENTING AND ANNOUNCING AN INCORRECT TEST READING.

I AM TRYING TO GIVE ALL PROFESSIONAL STAFF THE CORRECT SENSE OF URGENCY FOR THIS MATTER. WE HAVE HAD SOME INCORRECT ANNOUNCMENTS MOTIVATE THE PATIENTS TO SUICIDE AND THAT IS UNFORGIVABLE !

THE STEROID USAGE MAY NOT ALWAYS EFFECT THE FULL FUNCTIONALITY OF YOUR NATURAL SYSTEM IF, FOR INSTANCE, YOU HAD A HOSPITAL ADMISSION AND ONLY TOOK THEM FOR 1 WEEK. BUT IT IS NOT GUARENTEED THAT THEY STILL WILL NOT HAVE EFFECTED YOUR SYSTEM ENOUGH TO THROW TEST RESULTS INTO AN INACCURATE READING.

THE STEROID USE IS TO BE CAREFULLY "WEENED" OFF OF. DO NOT LET THEM JUST CUT YOU OFF. IT IS WEENED DOWN IN A 1-2 WEEK PERIOD, DWINDLING OFF TO TAKE 1, TAKE 1/2, TAKE NONE ON THE LAST DAY.


AFTER THE PROPER WEENING OF STEROID PRODUCTS, WHICH OFTEN INCLUDE ASTHMA INHALERS, YOU CAN EXPECT THE BODY TO BEGIN A RETURN TO NORMAL FUNCTION AND THE FULL TRACE INTERFERENCE OF STEROID USE SHOULD BE COMPLETELY ELIMINATED WITHIN 6MONTHS.

** [8-1-09 ADD-ON, BY DAWN NARET' - "DON'T FORGET THE POSSIBILITY OF BEEF AND OTHER MEAT LIVESTOCK, THAT MAY HAVE BEEN INJECTED WITH STEROIDS. WE SHOULD ALL CONTACT OUR CONGRESSMEN TO DEMAND A HIGHER PRIORITY TO BE GIVEN ON THE INVESTIGATION OF DANGEROUS LIVESTOCK DRUG/CHEMICAL INJECTIONS. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR INJECTING LIVESTOCK WITH STEROIDS, EXCEPT TO FRAUDULENTLY PUMP UP THE MUSCLE AND WEIGHT FOR MORE PROFIT. THESE DECEPTIVE PRACTICES ARE ABUSIVE TO THE ANIMAL AND NOW HAVE BECOME A HEALTH HAZARD TO HUMANS. - END OF ADD-ON.]

AFTER 6 MONTHS, YOU SHOULD AGAIN BE READING NEGATIVE HIV AND NEGATIVE DIABETES.

PLEASE LOOK IN THE PDR, TO VERIFY THIS INFORMATION, AND THEN HELP SPREAD IT AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE.
THANK YOU, DAWN NARET'

SLIDE SHOW - "AMERICAN INDIANS", BY DAWN NARET'



THE AMERICAN INDIANS ARE THE ONLY AMERICANS WHO ARE "NOT" DESCENDED FROM IMMIGRANTS ! WE APOLOGIZE FOR ALL OUR ABUSIVE INJUSTICES AND ARE GRATEFUL TO THEM FOR THEIR MERCIFULNESS AND TOLERANCE OF OUR INTRUSION.

THEIR HONOR, CHARACTER, KNOWLEDGE, PERSERVERENCE, STRENTH, COURAGE, MORAL TRIBAL CODES AND EARTHLY BONDING AND PROTECTING ARE AN INSPIRATION TO US AND A STANDARD OF GOALS FOR OUR CHILDREN.

"WE DO NOT OWN THIS LAND.....WE BORROW IT FROM OUR CHILDREN" - AN AMERICAN INDIAN QUOTE

** PLEASE CLICK RESTART TO SEE HOW MUCH OF IT YOU MISSED !



CIRCA 1870 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL


PORTRAIT BY ANDY WARHOL


" OF THE PEOPLE....BY THE PEOPLE....FOR THE PEOPLE....

" OF THE PEOPLE....BY THE PEOPLE....FOR THE PEOPLE....
I REPEAT FOR "YOUR" RETENTION :
"THE GOVERNMENT, OF ITSELF, IS NOT A PHYSICAL ENTITY OR HUMAN GROUP. IT IS A VACANT OFFICE THAT WE PERMIT ELECTED OFFICIALS TO ENTER AND SIT IN TEMPOARILY, TO HONORABLY AND DEMOCRATICALLY CONDUCT THE MAINTENENCE OF THE TREASURY ACCOUNTING, LEDGISLATIVE AND JUDICIARY FUNCTIONS, ACCORDING TO OUR SYSTEMS, ESTABLISHED BY THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. THERE IS NO AUTHORITY GIVEN TO THE GOVERNMENT, EXCEPT WHAT "THE PEOPLE" PERMIT FOR THEM TO SERVE AT. AND THE PEOPLE MAY DISMISS ANY OR ALL ELECTED OR APPOINTED OFFICIALS, ANYTIME THEY ARE FOUND TO BE FUNCTIONING OUTSIDE THE PARAMETERS, ASSIGNED TO EACH DEPARTMENT, ACCORDING TO THOSE DEPARTMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATES. BUT WE WILL NEVER DISMISS THE GOVERNMENT SYSTEM OF THE U.S., OR OUR BELOVED CONSTITUTION, FOR IT ALONE IS WHAT CREATED, MAINTAINS AND PROTECTS OUR FREEDOM." - BY DAWN NARET'

WHAT TIME'ZIT ? ?



CUTE LITTLE WALKING PUMPKIN


LET MY "PUMKY" DO YER WALKING......
TO MY OTHER PAGES !

I AM PROUD OF THE WORK ACCOMPLISHED ON THESE SITES....................PLEASE VISIT ! THEY ARE ALL DIFFERENT !

VISIT MY "QUANTUM" (LITTLE PIECES) BLOG SITES !

VISIT MY “QUANTUM” (LITTLE PIECES) BLOGSITES !

THESE LITTLE "QUANTUM BLOGS" ARE COLLECTIONS OF YOUTUBE.COM VIDEOS THAT I GATHERED FOR PERSONAL KICK BACK ENTERTAINMANT. SOMETIMES YOU JUST WANT A BLAST FROM THE PAST !
THEY WERE QUANTUM CLIP COLLESCTION SEGMENTSPOSTED ON “SUB ATOMIC QUANTUM HUMOR”, WHICH NEEDED THINNING, SO I BRANCHED THESE SEGMENTS ONTO SEPARATE URL DIRECT LINK CLICK INS, TO FREE UP SOME SPACE.

"QUANTUM LUCY"
http://www.quantumlucy.blogspot.com/


"QUANTUM HOWDY DOODY"
http://www.quantumhowdydoody.blogspot.com/


"QUANTUM OZ"
http://www.quantumoz.blogspot.com/


"QUANTUM SUPERMAN"
http://www.quantumsuperman.blogspot.com/


"QUANTUM HORROR"
http://www.quantumhorror.blogspot.com/


"QUANTUM SCIFI"
http://www.quantumscifi.blogspot.com/


"QUANTUM HOLLYWOOD ROYALTY"
http://www.quantumhollywoodroyalty.blogspot.com/


"QUANTUM GARBO"
http://www.quantumgarbo.blogspot.com/


"QUANTUM COMMERCIALS"
http://www.quantumcommercials.blogspot.com/


"QUANTUM ELVIRA"
http://www.quantumelvira.blogspot.com/


RE-PUBLISHING OF 3/28/07 "SMOKERS RIGHTS OR NON-SMOKERS WRONGS", BY DAWN NARET'

(*VIEW ALL ARTICLES, ON SMOKERS RIGHTS BY DAWN NARET AT:

"SMOKERS HAVE RIGHTS TOO....SO KISS MY BUTT ! ! " AT:
http://www.sokissmybutt.blogspot.com/


I have been concerned alot about the 1-sided equality of rights being given to non-smokers.

I am a smoker, admitted..confessed..BUT, still qualifying as an American Citizen protected by the Constitution of the United States.

Why have I been banished by a large segment of society that does not smoke? I have not banished them...Why would they wish to banish me?

I see great validity in non-smokers complaint that they are afraid that smoking is dangerous to their health. Surely we have all read the surgeon General's Reports. We have also read that the tobacco industry has been investigated for adding over 400 chemicals to their product.

Were they ever fined?
Did they ever have to pay increased tobacco tax for various city or state expenditures?
Are they still putting all that unnecessesary chemical additive into their product?
Have they been banished to conduct their work 15 feet from the building?

These are valid points that I do not believe are getting enough attention in this "Smokers vs. Non-Smokers" conflict of mushrooming issues and restriction creating passtime of the non-smokers.

Granted, we have been told of the dangers of smoking.

But is it still a legal product to use?
Is it still a free choice to consume?
Is it a right of the smokers to smoke or not to smoke?
Is it a right of the smokers to have their health considered and protected, if necessary, by new rules and by-laws even though they choose to "endanger" their health with by smoking?

How about by drinking?

If they choose to consume a legal product that could endanger their health, could they lose their rights of protection in other arenas relating to health?
If they choose to drink, are their rights to health protection waived?
What about their alcohol breath?
Could it be inhaled by us and therefore make us drunk or vulnerable to cirrhosis of the liver, if we stand face to face and breath enough of their alcohol breath? (I have definitely detected a foul scent of alcohol on my clothing after spending too much time standing next to a drinker, or standing in a drinking arena).
Could there be such a thing as second-hand alcoholism or related illnesses?
Or even second-hand bad-breath?

I, personally, have never been convinced of the "second-hand smoke" theories. My personal opinion has been that there are far too many toxic contaminants and untoward effects of technologies, in the environment, that no one is addressing adequately or honestly.

I believe that Smoking has become the "fall guy" of an excuse for why are so many of our citizens becoming ill? I believe that someone, possibly trying to buffalo the E.P.A., said, "not us...we didn't do it", and blamed it on the smokers.

But why are even NON-smokers getting ill? Oh !! That's the ticket !! Second-Hand Smoke !! Of course !! Blame it on "second-hand smoke" !!

Well if smoke vapors can enter the lungs of a NON-smoker and create illness...could not alcohol vapors also be entering your lungs and also exist as a health danger??
Should we have "drinking" and "NON-drinking" party areas at the office or in restaurants?
Should we load all new tax income collections onto the alcohol consumption products?
Should we banish the first, second and third martini to be consumed outside the building...at least 15 feet from the door?
Should we run help-wanted ads inviting only NON-drinkers to apply?
Should we run house for rent ads inviting only NON-drinkers to inquire?

Would these actions not be viewed as discriminatory? Would they not be viewed as prejudice? Would they be taking a personal dislike of one NON-drinkers preference and using it to violate the equal-rights of the drinkers' preference?

These are serious issues, that have been debated, with rhetoric upon rhetoric upon memorized, repetitious rhetoric. I am tired of hearing the same old memorized lines of debate coming out of the mouths of previously intelligent folks who were never against the constitutional rights of anyone.

My right to health considerations are just as valid and deserving as those considerations for the health of a NON-smoker.

Because I smoke, Does anyone have the right to banish me to the outside of a building, in ALL inclimate weather conditions with no shelter from the rain, the snow or the temperature with a lack of comfortable and hygienic seating conditions, just because the NON-smokers are concerned about their health.

What about MY health? Am I not now, forcibly being exposed to and vulnerable to becoming too chilled, too rained on, too frozen, to unrelaxed or break-rested? Might I even now be more vulnerable to catching a cold or developing pneumonia or receiving an over-exposure to exhaust fumes in the street?

Why is MY health considered any less valuable, to warrant receiving less protection, than the health of a NON-smoker?
Why is the solution to their personal health concern going to be to eliminate any concern for MY health?
Do you have any idea, those who do not smoke, just how many illnesses are resulting from the inconvenience of being thrown out into the street, every time you want to have a cigarette?
Do you realize that Jobs ARE being withheld from smokers!
Do you realize that Housing IS being refused to smokers !
Do you agree that these are "inalienable rights" protected by the constitution?
Do you want your inalienable rights ripped away?
Do you think you have any right to rip away the constitutional rights of others?

I really do not think that most NON-smokers are trying to destroy the rights that the constitution grants to ALL citizens. I believe that a force of rhetoric and terroristic media have brought many of them to the brink of a state of paranoia with cigarettes and cigarette smokers.
First it was separate areas, in the same room demands. OK, smokers are considerate people, no problem. We did not want to cause them any discomfort. Next, it was separate rooms. Now hold on...we will miss socializing with you...but, if it makes you happy...Then it was outside the building. This is where the serious violations and symptoms of paranoia began exposing themselves. Now it is at least 15 feet from the building as their latest demand.....Where does it end??????

The symptomology of continued complaint and instant gratification demands and expectation are now becoming a mental stability concern for the NON-smokers. Why is enough never enough?? Once they receive cooperation and pacification, they return again...and again...and again...with the same complaint and new, more expanded, more controlling, more discriminatory, more banishment oriented demands than those of the last time. And nothing new has occurred to validate a repeat of the complaint, to begin with, whatsoever. Where does it end? It has become, already, a violation of constitutional rights. Does it have to become assassination or deportment to a leper island to satisfy their now obsessive control and segregation issues?

What have they done to these poor NON-smoking intelligent people, to cause these very serious mental health related symptoms to be emerging more and more strongly with every discriminatory demand they repeat their obsession with? These were GOOD people. How did they become so discriminatory and self-centered that they are now willing to violate the constitutional rights of everyone in the country?

I am sure that a reality check, by those who have been steam-rolling with the rhetoric command post, will see the ugly portrait that is developing of their now highly suspicious efforts.

Soon, people will not feel comfortable socializing with them, because they have a tendency to these obsessive/compulsive discriminatory mental health issues.

I am not a prejudiced person, but could you please have your NON-smoking campaign at least 15 feet from the building? We are trying to erase the errors, committed against smokers, and to put an END to the violations of everyone's constitutional rights, before they are a lost and obsolete memory of Democracy.
Thank you for smoking,Dawn Naret', Author of "We The People": http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/, mailto:text.reply2dn@gmail.com

"BAN ALL BANS", BY DAWN NARET'

I have been a victim of several of these offences myself. Most recently, I was on a public Pittsburgh city bus and I was dozed off. The bus driver called the Bus Co. security guards to wake me, and the guard woke me up by hitting me more than 10 times. At least 6 times after I was awake a hollering for him to stop hitting me.

When I demanded his company I.D. and declared that I am filing an official complaint of abuse and assault, he issued me a citation for "disorderly conduct" ! I was being physically assaulted and he issues ME a citation to intimidate and cover-up what he had done. Then, he told someone,that he had called, to PUT ME ON THE LIST. I asked what list, and he told me it was none of my business.

Then, I appealed the citation and had a hearing with the magistrate. The magistrate violated my right to "DUE PROCESS" by not letting me testify that I was instigated to an angry verbal discourse, because I had been physically assaulted by this man. He cut off my speaking and said "that is irrelevant". I was found guilty and definitely appealed that decision.

I am fighting an attempt to "CRIMINALIZE" my reputation as an honest, honorable, law-abiding, loyal American. If you haven't DONE anything for them to criminalize you with, they will FABRICATE it or FRAME YOU !!

This is the WAR that we are fighting RIGHT NOW against all of these ANTI-AMERICANS that are persecuting us if we do not join their party or cooperate with their group, which slanders and provides false witnessing against American Citizens, in order to steal their identity, their job, their business or their children !!!

I am of the opinion that any POLITICIAN who votes for these bans does indeed commit an "ANTI-AMERICAN" act. I will not even be satisfied if they vote for EQUAL RIGHTS and cancel the state Ban Idea.

I want our Rights protected with a national, across the board, abolishment of any existing or proposed ban, of this nature that so violates the Constitution and promotes HOMELESSNESS, UNEMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION, PREJUDICE and DEATH of American citizens.

OBAMA GIVES FULL AUTHORITY TO FDA, TO REMOVE DANGEROUS ADDITIVES, END SECOND-HAND SMOKE CONCERNS ! !




INCLUDES: JUNE 16, 2009 UPDATE ! !

"OBAMA GIVES FULL AUTHORITY TO FDA, TO REMOVE ALL DANGEROUS ADDITIVES, ERASE SECOND-HAND-SMOKE CONCERNS AND THEN WE CAN BAN ALL SMOKING BANS ! ! "

APRIL 29, 2009
BY DAWN NARET’, PITTSBURGH, PA

HATS OFF TO PRESIDENT OBAMA ! !
IN APRIL, 2009, THE PRESIDENT TOOK THE FIRST STEPS NECESSARY TO END THE GLOBAL FARCE AND DISCRIMINATION BEING ENACTED, UNDER THE GUISE AND EXCUSE OF….”SECOND-HAND-SMOKE” DANGERS.

THIS “THEORY” HAS BEEN THE LEVERAGE USED FOR THE ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, DISCRIMINATING, OFFENDING, BANISHING AND ERASURE OF NORMAL LIFESTYLE OF MILLIONS OF NORMAL, HONORABLE, INTELLECTUAL HUMANS, WHO MERELY HAVE CHOSEN TO SMOKE A LEGAL CIGARETTE, AFTER MEALS OR IN PUBLIC OR EVEN IN THEIR OWN HOME.

I WAS IN A BOOKSTORE RECENTLY, AND GAZED AT SEVERAL LIFESIZE MURALS OF ALL THE FAMOUS CLASSICAL AUTHORS AND NOTICED THAT EVERY ONE OF THEM WAS SMOKING, IN THE PORTRAITS. SMOKING HAS ALWAYS BEEN A LIFESTYLE OF THE "STYLISH". IT WILL ALWAYS BE THAT AND NOT SOME DIRTY LITTLE SECRET THAT THOSE WITH LESS STYLE OR THE ABILITY TO GIVE EQUAL RIGHTS AND CHOICE TO MIGHT TRY TO REIMAGE IT.


THE UGLY, SELFISH DEMANDS BY OTHERS, WHO HAVE ATTEMPTED TO FORCE THEIR OWN PHILOSOPHIES ON EVERYONE IN THE WORLD, HAVE BEEN CREATING GREAT INCONVENIENCES, LAWSUITS AND EVEN HEATH DETRIMENTS TO SMOKERS.

SECOND-HAND-SMOKE IS A STILL A THEORETIC POSSIBILITY, IF CONSTANT, CUMULATIVE EXPOSURE IS EXPERIENCED BY A NON-SMOKER. BUT, INSTANT HEALTH DANGERS EXIST, WHEN A SMOKER IS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST, KICKED OUTSIDE AND FORCED TO HAVE A CIGARETTE IN A USUALLY NON-HYGIENIC ENVIRONMENT, NEXT TO TRASH AREAS, AND GIVEN NO SEATING OR SHELTER FROM INCLIMATE ELEMENTS.

IMMEDIATE ILLNESS COULD RESULT FROM EXPOSURE FROM THE REALITY OF BACTERIA, PNEUMONIA, OR STRESS RELATED FACTIONS OF EMOTIONAL RESPONSE TO BEING SO INSULTED AND HAVING THEIR RIGHTS SO VIOLATED.

THE NON-SMOKERS HAVE BEEN ATTACKING THE SMOKERS, ON AN ISSUE THAT THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN GUILTY OF………POSSIBLE CARCINOGENS IN THE EXHALANTS OF SMOKERS CIGARETTES. SMOKERS HAVE NEVER AGREED TO INHALE THESE CARCINOGENS AND ARE JUST AS ENRAGED AT THEIR ADDITION TO HEALTHY TOBACCO, AS THE NON-SMOKERS!

THIS DEBATE, NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN DIRECTED AT THE SMOKERS, WITH SECOND-HAND-SMOKE RESEARCH AND NON-PROVEN THEORIES, OR WITH SMOKING BANS AND INCREASING ATTEMPTS TO CRIMINALIZE ANYONE CHOOSING TO CONSUME A LEGAL PRODUCT.

THE DEBATE, CORRECTIONAL MEASURES AND DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DIRECTED AT THE TOBACCO COMPANIES, WHO DECIDED TO ADD THESE POISONS TO AN OTHERWISE, HEALTHY GREEN PLANT CREATED BY GOD, NON-POISONOUS, NON-HEALTH ENDANGERING, FULLY DEVELOPED, READY TO SIMPLY SHRED AND PACKAGE, TOTALLY ORGANIC PRODUCT THAT NEEDS NO ADDITIVES.

WHY HAVE THEY BEEN ADDING THESE CHEMICALS AND CARCINOGENS?
I SUSPECT THAT IT WAS TO INCREASE ADDICTION AND ALSO MAKE THE CIGARETTES BURN FASTER, IN ORDER TO FORCE CONSUMERS TO BUY MORE FREQUENTLY. OF COURSE, THIS IS ONLY MY OPINION……..BUT, WHY ELSE WOULD ANYONE POSSIBLY CHOOSE TO PUT POISON INTO A HEALTHY GREEN PLANT PRODUCT ?

TOBACCO IS THE SAME AS BASIL OR OREGANO. GRASSHOPPERS EAT THE LEAVES AS THEIR MAIN DAILY FOOD SOURCE, AND SPIT THE RESIDUAL “TOBACCO JUICE” OUT. IN HUMANS, THIS TRACE OF TAR AND NICOTINE STIMULATE THE BODY’S NATURAL CLEANSING SYSTEM, TO RID ITSELF OF TOXINS, THE SAME AS CITRIC ACID IN JUICE OR TANIC ACID IN TEA AND THEREFORE, SERVES AS A HEALTH ASSISTANT TO SMOKERS.

BUT ASIDE FROM THE HARM ITS “ABSENCE” IS INDUCING ON SMOKERS, WE HAVE TO WONDER “WHY” THE TOBACCO COMPANIES HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH RUINING A CONSUMABLE PRODUCT, FOR ALL THESE YEARS.

THE PROBLEM HAS BEEN WITH THE AUTHORITY HELD, BY THE F.D.A., FEDERAL FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION.

THE FDA ALWAYS HAD THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE INGREDIENTS AND PROTECT CONSUMERS FROM DANGEROUS ADDITIVES, BECAUSE TOBACCO IS “CONSUMED” INTO THE BODY, THROUGH INHALING INTO THE LUNGS. THE BLOOD COMES TO THE LUNGS TO BE OXYGENATED AND FLOWS DIRECTLY TO THE BRAIN AND EVERY CELL OF OUR BODY.

THAT IS MORE “CONSUMED” THAN ANY FOOD OR DRUG. THAT IS DEFINITELY UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE FDA TO PROTECT THE CONSUMERS FROM HEALTH DANGERS. BUT, THE PROBLEM, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, HAS BEEN THE TITLE OF THE DEPARTMENT, “FOOD AND DRUG” ADMINISTRATION, DID NOT SPECIFICALLY INCLUDE PRODUCTS OF TOBACCO.

IS TOBACCO INHALED?
IS IT THEN THE SAME AS ANY MEDICINAL INHALANT, PRODUCED AND MARKETED BY DRUG COMPANIES FOR ASTHMA?
IS IT NOT THEN LEGALLY AN INHALLANT?
DOES IT NOT THEN FALL UNDER THE LEGAL AUTHORITY OF AT LEAST “DRUG” AREA OF FDA RESPONSIBILITY, EVEN THOUGH IT IS NOT PRODUCED BY THEM, BUT IS FULLY PRODUCED TO COMPLETION BY GOD?
YES…YES…YES…AND YES ! ! !

THE FDA SHOULD HAVE BEEN POLICING THESE INGREDIENTS ALL ALONG AND FORCING THEIR REMOVAL, INSTEAD OF ALLOWING A WARNING NOTE TO BE POSTED ON THE PACKAGE !

“IF IT IS HARMFUL TO THE CONSUMER HEALTH…THEN GET IT OUT OF THERE ! !” – QUOTE – DAWN NARET’

NOW, FOR THE GOOD NEWS ! !

PRESIDENT OBAMA, IN HIS CONCERN FOR THE WELL-BEING OF EQUALITY AND GOOD HEALTH, TO “ALL” THE CITIZENS , HAS ALREADY SIGNED A NEW BILL DECLARING THE FDA TO HAVE FULL AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR REGULATING TOBACCO COMPANIES ! !

(JUNE 16, 2009 ADD-ON) WITH THE FDA FINALLY HAVING THE FULL AUTHORITY TO DEMAND THAT ALL DANGEROUS ADDITIVES THAT ARE “DANGEROUS TO YOUR HEALTH” BE INSTANTLY AND COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM ALL TOBACCO PRODUCTS ………THAT WILL BE THE TOTAL END TO “SECOND-HAND-SMOKE” FEARS AND EXCUSES TO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST SMOKERS OR EVEN HAVE ANY EXCUSE FOR UNCONSTITUTIONAL SMOKING BANS.

THE MASSIVE VOLUNTEERS, WHO PARTICIPATED IN THESE DEMONIC WITCH HUNTS AGAINST SMOKERS, WILL HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE FOR ANY CONTINUED HORROR OR CRUELTY AGAINST INNOCENT CONSUMERS WHO WERE JUST CONSUMING A LEGAL PRODUCT.

WE EXPECT ALL THE HORRIBLE CRUELTY AND BANISHMENT TO THE OUTSIDE TO END IMMEDIATELY, UPON THE FDA BANNING HARMFUL ADDITIVES TO TOBACCO PRODUCTS. LIFESTYLES MUST RETURN TO NORMAL, INCLUDING A SMOKE AFTER DINNER OR WITH YOUR COFFEE, OR ANYTIME AND ANYWHERE YOU CHOOSE. THOSE WHO DO NOT CONDONE FREE CHOICE, WILL HAVE TO MAKE THEIR CHOICE TO LEAVE THE AREA OF OFFENSE, IF THEY STILL FEEL THAT STRONGLY AGAINST SMOKERS.

BUT, I SUSPECT THAT THE GUT TRUTH, TO ALL THE HARRASSMENT AND PREJUDICE, HAS ALWAYS BEEN THAT THEY JUST ENJOY HURTING THESE PEOPLE AND HAVE NO GREAT CONCERN ABOUT CIGARETTES AT ALL.

EVEN THEY KNEW THAT SECOND-HAND-SMOKE COULD NEVER HURT ANYONE WHO WAS ONLY HAVING A SHORT TEMPORARY EXPOSURE. EVEN ONE ONE THEIR FAMOUS SMOKE-OUT DOCTORS, ADMITTED THAT IN TRUTH, EXPOSURE DURING LUNCH OR EVEN DURING AN 8 HOUR SHIFT, WOULD NOT ACCUMULATE AS MUCH DANGER AS A 24 HR IN ONE’S OWN HOME EXPOSURE WOULD. AND STATED CLEARLY THAT A ONE HALF HOUR CONTACT WILL HAVE NO EFFECT WHAT-SO-EVER. HOWEVER, THE UPSET TO THE INTERRUPTED LIFESTYLE OF SMOKING WHILE OR FOLLOWING EATING, FOR THE SMOKER, HAS REVEALED SOME DEFINITE HAZARDS TO INVOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE. EVEN THE INDIVIDUAL DIGESTIVE SYSTEMS AND CIRCULATORY SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO HAVE ILL-EFFECTS FROM LOSS OF THE HEALTHY MICROBIAL BENEFITS THAT SMOKING GIVES TO SMOKERS. THE TRACE OF NICOTINE EVEN HAS THE NATURAL CLEANSING STIMULATION, TO THE BODY, THAT CITRIC ACID MAINTAINS AS ITS ATTRACTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY. IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN DETRIMENTAL TO THE SMOKERS HEALTH TO QUIT INVOLUNTARILY. SOME WERE NEVER ABLE RETRIRVE THOSE NATURAL CLEANSING PROCESSES WITHOUT THE AID OF THE TOBACCO LEAF INGREDIENTS.

AND ALL WERE 100% MORE IN DANGER OF DANGERS TO THEIR HEALTH AFFLICTING THEM, BECAUSE THEY WERE BEING THROWN OUTSIDE, IN INCLIMATE WEATHER, USUALLY NEXT TO TRASH CANS, HAD NO COMFORTABLE SEATING AND WERE VULNERABLE TO PNEUMONIA AND BACTERIAL INVASIONS EVERYTIME THAT A “PUBLIC” ESTABLISHMENT DECIDED TO VIOLATE THEIR RIGHT TO “EQUALITY” AND BAN THEM FROM THE INSIDE WHERE ALL “PUBLIC” CUSTOMERS WHO DID NOT SMOKE, WERE FREE TO SIT IN COMFORT.

IF YOU ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, YOU MUST BE OPEN TO “ALL” THE PUBLIC. YOUR BUSINESS IS NOT YOUR PRIVATE HOME. SO THERE ARE SOME “PERSONAL PREFERENCES”, THAT YOU MAY MAKE IN YOUR HOME, BUT THEY ARE AND ALWAYS WERE, “UNCONSTITIONAL” OR VIOLATIONS TO SOMEONE’S RIGHTS TO MAKE THEM “RULES OF YOUR PREFERENCE”, IN YOUR BUSINESS.


NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO BAN SMOKING ANYTIME OR ANYWHERE. IT IS A PERSONAL AND A LEGAL CHOICE.


SMOKERS AND NON-SMOKERS ARE REJOICING AND LOOKING FORWARD TO THE BANISHMENT OF ALL SMOKING BANS AND DISCRIMINATION ASSOCIATED WITH THEM.

BY DAWN NARET’

http://www.sokissmybutt.blogspot.com/

dawnnaret@gmail.com

LIKE A "DAWN NARET'"....THIS COUNTRY WILL RISE FROM THE FLAMES AND ABUSE ! !

LIKE A "DAWN NARET'"....THIS COUNTRY WILL RISE FROM THE FLAMES AND ABUSE ! !

LETS "LEAP" BACK IN TIME: PRESIDENTS EISENHOWER AND KENNEDY ON "NEW WORLD ORDER"

Click to view at youtube.com:

"44 PRESIDENTS OF THE U.S." - (ALL ARE PICTURED AND CAPTIONED WITH A PERSONAL QUOTE. I MUST CHALLENGE THE QUOTE GIVEN FROM GEORGE WASHINGTON THOUGH. IT STATES THAT OUR CONSTITUTION WAS "NOT" FOUNDED ON RELIGION.

I SUSPECT THAT THIS IS A MISQUOTE OR AN ACTUAL QUOTE TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT. IT POSSIBLE THAT HE WAS SPEAKING OF WHETHER OUR LAWS ARE DIRECTLY THE LAWS OF CHRISTIANS, AND HE INTENDED TO CLARIFY THAT OUR LAWS WERE WRITTEN, WITH THE PURIST OF DEMOCRATIC INTENTIONS FOR THE BENEFIT OF "ALL" THE PEPOLE.)

"44 PRESIDENTS OF THE U.S."

PART 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyWC1vB69u0
PART 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=virShL_7hzs


VICE PRESIDENTS OF THE U.S. -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIW5_x94c0I


1961 PRESIDENT EISENHOWER WARNS OF:
“NEW WORLD ORDER” -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaVOFNpDds4


DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMYEJ7qCGd4

****************************************************
VIEW MIKE GRAVEL GIVING THIS EDUCATIONAL SPEECH, ON THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdzmP9psPcU

“When in the course of human events, unattended grievances make it obviously necessary for citizens to reexamine the structure of their government and bring about change.

We were once a great nation, created by immigrants from foreign lands who populated a bountiful American continent. We now witness our nation's prestige and our domestic liberties considerably diminished.

We, who suffer the consequences of a dysfunctional system of government, seek to reaffirm our founding principles and to improve upon the structure of representative government.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all human beings are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

To secure these rights, Government is instituted in society, deriving its just powers from the consent of the governed.

However, if a Government controlled by special interests becomes unconcerned with the public's wellbeing and destructive of the people's rights, it is the duty, not just the right of the people to change the government to provide new safeguards for the citizens' security and happiness.

The malevolent corrupting power of money on the body politic has caused repeated injuries to the public interest.

To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a suffering nation and a disillusioned world:”

FULL TEXT:
http://www.mikegravel.us/content/decl...
Vote for the Democracy

Amendment:
http://www.nationalinitiative.us/-

Special Thanks to John Sennett & PressTV

Category: News & Politics
Tags:


CLICK LINKS - then “back-arrow-page” to return here


ELLIS ISLAND VIDEOS - CIRCA - 1928-1932


Because, there was a time.... in the beginning,... when all laws and politics were written to provide benefit and protection for all people, Equally....When, did they first begin twisting it to make the general, law-abiding, honorable citizen "the bad guy"?















"I want our Rights protected with a national, across the board, abolishment of any existing or proposed ban, of this nature, that so violates the Constitution and promotes HOMELESSNESS, UNEMPLOYMENT, DISCRIMINATION, PREJUDICE and DEATH of American citizens." QUOTE OF DAWN NARET' FROM "BAN ALL BANS







“IMMIGRATION THROUGH ELLIS ISLAND”



CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4wzvuxpznk
















“IRISH ANNIE MOORE - ISLE OF HOPE, ISLE OF TEARS”



CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acxidybku7q












“THE GOLDEN DOOR – PART 1”



CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaqmwdlg_qa












“THE GOLDEN DOOR – PART 2”



CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3frppvj8o7












“ELLIS ISLAND – THE STATUE OF LIBERTY”



CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfz_uvjygg4












“ANDREA BOCELLI – THE STATUE OF LIBERTY”



CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eloxgkiefwu












ANDREA BOCELLI – AT STATUE OF LIBERTY CONCERT – “LA DONNA E’ MOBILE”



CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpotv4xhohe














ANDREA BUCELLI - NESSUN DORMA


CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbGKQ8YASCY








“PAVORATTI – NESSUN DORMA”

CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdtbm14ooz8








“THE THREE TENORS – PAVOROTTI-DOMINGO-CARRERAS – NESSUN DORMA”

CLICK HERE TO VIEW: http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdtcidmr_6i












THANK YOU SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND MR. MICHAEL RATNER, (BY DAWN NARET 6/13/08 - UPDATED 6/15/09)

MR. MICHAEL RATNER, PRESIDENT OF THE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS


AND “ALL” THE MOST HONORABLE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, WHO VOTED TO UPHOLD THE PROTECTION OF “ALL” WHO ARE ACCUSED AS GUILTY, UNTIL THEY CAN BE PROVEN AS GUILTY, IN A COURT OF LAW…..EVEN IF THEY ARE “NOT” UNITED STATES CITIZENS.

GOD BLESS YOU AND THANK YOU FOR BEING THE FIRST RAY OF HOPE, THAT THERE IS STILL A CHANCE TO SAVE OUR DEMOCRATIC JUDICIAL SYSTEM, THROUGH YOUR EXTREMELY PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIALLY CORRECT OPINION ON THE APPEAL PROCESS, OF THE DETAINEES BEING ILLEGALLY HELD AT THE GITMO MILITARY PRISON.


WE HAVE ALL WATCHED IN HORROR AS THESE EVENTS HAVE UNFOLDED OVER NOW, A SPAN OF YEARS. HOW LONG WERE THESE "PRESUMABLY INNOCENT, UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY PEOPLE, EXPECTED TO WAIT AND PICK UP WHAT IS LEFT OF THEIR SEIZED LIVES?


THE PROBLEM IS, AS ALWAYS, A SITUATION, THAT IS EXTREMELY SENSITIVE AND POSSIBLY PHYSICALLY HARMFUL TO SOMEONE, AND THE "URGENCY" OF AN IMMEDIATE RESOLVEMENT, OR AT LEAST A RESPONSIBLY HUMAN VISIBLE INQUIRY, INTO THEIR IMMEDIATE SAFETY OF ENVIRONMENT AND BASIC NEEDS, WAS "PENCILED IN" AND TREATED AS A FAR AND DISTANT MATTER OF LOW PRIORITY.


MEANWHILE, PEOPLE HAVE DISAPPEARED, SUFFERED SERIOUS INJURY AND EVEN DIED....WHILE WAITING ON THE "LOW PRIORITY LIST. THESE ARE HUMAN LIVES HERE, THAT ARE NOT LEGALLY "GUILTY PEOPLE".

AND WHAT IF THEY WERE GUILTY? WOULD WE NOT STILL BE OBLIGATED TO TREAT THEM IN A HUMANE MANNER, AS WE WOULD WANT THE COMFORT AND SECURITY OF KNOWING, THAT OUR TROOPS, SHOULD THEY BECOME MILITARY "PRISONERS OF WAR",WERE BEING TREATED, IF SEIZED IN ANOTHER COUNTRY?


WHERE HAS THE KNOWLEDGE AND OBSERVANCE, OF THE RULES OF THE GENEVA CONVENTION GONE? HAS OUR MORAL CHARACTER BECOME SO DEGENERATE, THAT WE NO LONGER HAVE THE CAPACITY TO LOOK AHEAD AND REALIZE THAT BY ABANDONING THE GENEVA CONVENTION, WE ARE PLACING OUR OWN TROOPS AND POSSIBLY OUR OWN CIVILIANS IN THE DANGEROUS VULNERABILITY, OF "WHAT GOES AROUND, COMES AROUND".



IF THE U.S. CONDONES SUCH UNAMERICAN AND INHUMANE PRACTICES, AS SECRET HIDDEN, OUT OF THE COUNTRY, MILITARY PRISONS, FOR PRISONERS WHO ARE NOT OF AN OFFICIAL ENEMY GROUP, IN AN ACTIVELY AND OFFICIALLY DECLARED WAR, THEN THEY HAVE SIMPLY SEIZED CIVILIANS, NO MATTER IF THEY HAVE AN ASSOCIATION TO AN OFFICIALLY DECLARED ENEMY, IN AN OFFICIALLY DECLARED WAR, BECAUSE THIS INFORMATION CANNOT BE VERIFIED BECAUSE WE DROPPED THE JURIS PRUDICE BALL, WHEN WE SEIZED AND TRANSFERRED WITHOUT FILING OFFICIAL CHARGES.


FROM THAT POINT, EVERYTHING DONE WAS ILLEGAL.
THESE PEOPLE WERE ESSENTIALLY KIDNAPPED CIVILIANS WITH NO OFFICIAL MILITARY OR EVEN PARA-MILITARY VERIFICATION, TO BE USED AS PROOF OF THE RIGHT TO IMPRISON, EVEN IN A U.S. LANDSIDE CIVILIAN PRISON.


AND ABSOLUTELY NOT ENOUGH VERIFICATION, TO ASSUME THEM TO BE "PRISONERS OF WAR", WHERE THERE IS NOT A DECLARED OR EXISTING WAR THEATER, THAT THEY HAVE CONDUCTED SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES IN !

EXECUTIVE STAFF AND THE 4 DISSENTING JUSTICES, WHO CHOOSE TO ABANDON RULES OF JURIS PRUDICE, HOLD THE EXCUSE THAT THESE ARE EXTRORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES.

WHAT IS SO EXTRORDINARY ABOUT A SUSPICION THAT SOMEONE MAY BE INTENDING TO BUILD A WEAPON, THAT COULD CAUSE BODILY INJURY? DO WE NOT HAVE VALID LAWS AND PROCEDURES OF JUSTICE THAT COULD HANDLE SUCH A CASE? WE HANDLE THESE TYPE CASES EVERY DAY, MORE THAN WE CARE TO ADMIT! AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS MORE AWARE, THAN THEY CARE TO HAVE A "NEED TO KNOW" ABOUT, INVOLVING "ALL" THE EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES AND LEVEL OF DANGER OF THE WEAPONRY.

THIS WAS NO EXCUSE TO ABANDON THE CONSTITUTIONAL FOUNDATION OF THE U.S. JUDICIAL SYSTEM. ANYONE CHOOSING TO DO SO, IS UNDER SUSPICION OF TREASON AND ANTI-AMERICAN PHILOSPHIES AND PRACTICE AS WELL AS AN INCOMPETENT, NO-CONFIDENCE STATUS OF JUDICIAL KNOWLEDGE AND COMPLIANCE.


YOU SIMPLY CANNOT IMPRISON ANY HUMAN ON SUSPICION. THE MILITARY IS NOT ABOVE THE U.S. JUDICIARY SYSTEM, AS LONG AS IT IS A SYSTEM OF NATIONAL DEFENCE, PAID FOR BY TREASURY FUNDS OF TAX CONTRIBUTIONS COLLECTED FROM U.S. CIVILIAN CITIZENS.


THE SAME AS THE "GOVERNMENT", THEY ARE NOT AN ENTITY OF OR FOR THEMSELVES, BUT MERELY A SYSTEM OF SERVICE PERSONNEL, ORGANIZED, TRAINED AND FUNDED BY U.S. CITIZENS AND SUBORDINATE TO ALL U.S. LAWS, THE SAME AS EVERY CITIZEN IS OBLIGATED TO.

WHY ARE WE IN “PARTNERSHIP” WITH COMMUNIST CUBA, TO PROVIDE SPACE TO HOUSE PRISONERS, OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY?

WHY ARE THERE EVEN MORE LOCATIONS, UNLIBERATED, THAT THESE TYPES OF PRISONERS HAVE BEEN SECRETLY TAKEN TO?

WHY ARE THEY BEING TAKEN OUT OF THE COUNTRY AT ALL?

IF THE TIME HAS EXPIRED FOR THEM TO BE FORMALLY CHARGED, WITH A CRIME, BEYOND THE CONSIDERATION OF TIME ALREADY SERVED, THEN WHY DO THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH ANY APPEALS PROCESS AT ALL?

IT SEEMS THAT TIME SERVED, WITH NO CHARGES FORMALLY MADE, IS ALREADY AN EMBARRASSMENT THAT COMPOUNDS THE INJUSTICE DONE TO THESE “STILL NOT PROVEN GUILTY OF ANY CRIME PEOPLE”.

AS A CITIZEN, THE HORROR HAS BEEN, TO SEE THE DEMONIC AND BARBARIAN CHARACTER, THAT OUR EXECUTIVE BRANCH LEADERS AND THE MILITARY STAFF ARE CAPABLE OF.



AS AN AMERICAN I AM ASHAMED TO BE AN AMERICAN, REPRESENTED AS A COMMUNIST DEMONIC TORCHERER OF HUMANS. IS THAT THE DEMOCRACY WE PRESENT AS OUR IMAGE?

OUR MILITARY USED TO BE HONORABLE AND OUR EXECUTIVE LEADERS USED TO BE LOYAL AMERICANS, TRUE TO PROTECTING DEMOCRATIC JUSTICE AND FREEDOM.

BUT PARTNERING WITH COMMUNISTS? AND COMMITTING TORCHER?

GOD BLESS YOU HONORABLE MEN TO HAVE WORKED SO HARD TO BRING THIS NIGHTMARE TO AN END FOR THESE POOR PEOPLE.

WE HAVE TO FEAR, FOR OURSELVES, THAT THIS ANIMAL MENTALITY, THAT HAS BEEN EXIBITED MAY EXPAND TO INCLUDE THE DEMOCRATIC JUDICIAL PROCESS BEING ERASED FOR CITIZENS AS WELL.

I AM SO OPPOSED TO THOSE WHO VIED WITH YOU ON THIS ISSUE.

I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE THE FIRST FORMAL CIVILIAN RIGHTS PROPOSAL, THAT WE DISBAR THOSE WHO CHOSE TO VOTE AGAINST THE DEMOCRATIC JUDICIAL PROCESS.

IF THEY HOLD A PHILOSOPHY THAT IS SO COMMUNISTIC, IN THEORY AND SO FAR FROM THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL PROCESS, THAT THEY COULD NOT SEE, FOR THEMSELVES, THAT THE VERY CORE, BEGINNING FOUNDATION OF THESE ACTIVITIES, THREW THE WHOLE EPISODE OUT OF COURT FOR NON JURIS PRUDICE, THEN THEY ARE DANGEROUS TO ALL WHO PRESENT BEFORE THEM, FOR EVALUATION AND OPINIONS AS FAIR AND JUST DECISIONS, THEY ARE INCOMPETENT FOR THE POSITION.

I DENOUNCE AND DISSENT THE CONTINUED ASSIGNMENT, AS SUPREME COURT JUSTICE, ALL THE FOLLOWING UNCONSTITUTIONALLY PHILOSOPHIED MEN, THAT HAVE EXPOSED THEIR UNDEMOCRATIC AND ANTI-AMERICAN FOUNDATION OF PHILOSOPHY AND HAVE OBVIOUSLY ABANDONED THE AMERICAN DEMOCRATIC LOYALITY TO THE RULES AND RITES OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE U.S. AND ITS JUDICIAL SYSTEM OF ACCEPTED LAWS AND PROCEDURES, THAT ”REQUIRE” COMPLIANCE,
LOYALITY AND COMMITMENT TO THE PRESERVATION OF THAT SYSTEM, IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED AS A COMPETENT AND QUALIFIED APPOINTED OFFICIAL, FOR SERVICE, TO THE PEOPLE, ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT:

JUSTICE SCALIA
JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS
JUSTICE SAMUEL ALITO JR.
JUSTICE JOHN G ROBERTS

I DEEM THEIR COMMUNIST-TYPE PHILOSOPHIES, TO BE OUTSIDE THE RHEALM OF THE PURE DEFINITIVE RESPONSIBILITIES AND KNOWLEDGABLE COMMITMENT, RELEGATED TO TRUSTED OFFICIALS IN THIS FREE DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY, AND TAKE THE EXECUTIVE LEADERS, WHO HAVE CONSPIRED, AND APPROVED ALL, THIS DEMONIC TREATMENT TO TASK WITH THEM.

THANK YOU,
DAWN NARET
P.O. BOX 2315
PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-2315

UPDATE JUNE 16, 2009

1 OF THE FIRST DECISIONS THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA MADE IN HIS FIRST 100 DAYS, WAS TO PERMANENTLY CLOSE "GITMO".

ALL PROGRESS HAS BEEN MOVING TO THE CONCLUSION OF THAT FINAL AND HONORABLE DECISION. GOD BLESS YOU, PRESIDENT OBAMA. - LOVE, DAWN NARET'

MY 3RD COURT APPEAL WON IN FIGHTING THE FAILING U.S. JUSTICIAL SYSTEM ! !



THE THIRD TIME WAS A CHARM IN ONE OF MY ON-GOING BATTLES AGAINST INJUSTICE AND VIOLATIONS AGAINST MY CIVIL, HUMAN AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS !

THE SUPERIOR COURT, IN PITTSBURGH, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PA, (JUDGES NAME TO BE ADDED AND APPLAUDED ASAP) READ MY SELF-AUTHORED, MORE THOUROUGH THAN ANY IN HISTORY, LEGAL BRIEF, SUBMITTED BY ME, AS MY OWN ATTORNEY, AND CONCLUDED THAT THE PLAY BY PLAY AND LINE BY LINE EVIDENCE, OUT OF THE MOUTH AND TESTIMONY OF MY OPPONENT WAS OVER WHELMING AND UNDENIABLE.

THAT I HAD BEEN ILLEGALLY CHARGED AND UNFAIRLY JUDGED, WITH PREJUDICE AND HAS OVER-TURNED THE DECISION OF THE LOWER COURT, OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PITTSBURGH, PA FROM GUILTY BY DECISION OF UNCREDIBLE TESTIMONY, TO A VERDICT OF INNOCENT AND AND THAT THE CHARGE DID NEVER MET THE CRITERIAN TEST, TO EVER BE MADE AGAINST ME.
THE CHARGE WAS "DISORDERLY CONDUCT", MADE BY A PITTSBURGH, PA PORT AUTHORITY SECURITY OFFICER, WHO IN APRIL OF 2007 WAS CALLED TO THE SCENE, WHERE A LADY (ME) WAS FOUND, BY THE DRIVER, TO BE ASLEEP ON A BUS AT THE END OF THE LINE AND HE COULD NOT WAKE HER UP AND CALLED FOR ADVISE FROM HIS SUPERVISOR.

THE SECURITY OFFICER WAS DISBATCHED AND IMMEDIATELTY BEGAN BEATING ON THE SLEEPING LADY AND YELLING TO WAKE UP AND GET OFF THE BUS. I AWAKENED IN A PANIC, TO FIND THIS STRANGE BLACK MAN IN MY SEAT WITH ME AND BEATING ON ME.

I PUBLISHED ALL THE DETAILS ON SEVERAL OF MY BLOG SITES, INCLUDING

"STALKING CRIMINALS ON INTERNET" AT:

WWW.STALKINGCRIMINALSONINTERNET.BLOGSPOT.COM


SO WILL NOT REPEAT THEM HERE. BUT THE IMPORTANT POINT WAS THAT, IN ORDER TO COVER UP WHAT HE HAD DONE WHICH WAS TO PHYSICALLY ASSUALT ME AND THEN TO REFUSE TO GIVE ME THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE BUS DRIVER, WHO WAS THE ONLY WITNESS, HE CHARGED ME WITH DISORDERLY CONDUCT, FOR REFUSING TO GET OFF THE BUS, UNTIL I HAD THE INFORMATION NECESSARY TO FILE A FORMAL COMPLAINT AND TRIED TO TURN THE STORY, OF THE EPISODE AROUND TO PORTRAY ME AS A LOW CHARACTURE WOMAN WHO IS WELL KNOWN AS A SLIME OF SOCIETY AND HE WAS A PERFECT PROFESSIONAL, JUST DOING HIS JOB.

I WISH THIS HAD BEEN A SMOKERS RIGHTS WIN, BUT IT IS JUST AS IMPORTANT, BECAUSE IT IS A WIN AGAINST THE EVOLVING INJUSTICE, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND OBVIOUS DISCRIMINATION THAT HAS TAKEN OVER OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM, LIKE A CANCER.

THE CHARGE WAS A MERE "CITATION". BUT I DID NOT DESERVE IT AND I WAS DETERMINED TO HAVE IT ERASED FROM MY CLEAN RECORD. TO ME, A "CITATION" IS LIKE A TRAFFIC TICKET. "DISORDERLY CONDUCT" IS MORE LIKE A BRAWLING, VIOLENT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND I WOULD NOT PERMIT MY REPUTATION TO BE SMEARED, WITH SUCH A BLASPHEMY OF MY CHARACTURE.

I FIRST APPEALED THE WRITING, OF THE CITATION AND HAD A HEARING, WITH THE MAGISTRATE, TO HAVE IT TORN UP.

THE MAGISTRATE WAS A BIZZARE MAN, FUNCTIONING TOTALLY OUTSIDE THE RHEALM OF JURISPRUDICE, AND WOULD NOT LET ME TESTIFY MY SIDE OF THE STORY. HE HAD ALREADY HEARD THE DISTORTED VERSION, OF THE DISHONEST SECURITY OFFICER, AS WELL AS AN INADVERTENT AMOUNT OF FALSE SLANDER AND GOSSIP TO SPICE AND DEFAME MY IMAGE, AND THAT WAS ENOUGH FOR HIM.

WHEN I TRIED TO SPEAK, I WAS THREATENED WITH A CHARGE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT, IF I SPOKE ONE MORE WORD. WHEN I ASKED IF I SHOULD NOT GET A CHANCE TO TELL MY SIDE OF THE STORY, HE GAVE ME A CHANCE TO SPEAK ONE WORD.
HE ASKED, "DID YOU "ARGUE" WITH HIM?" I SAID "YES" AND HE SAID "GUILTY !

ARE WE GOING TO ACCEPT AN EFFORT TO BRAIN-WASH U.S. CITIZENS INTO ACCEPTING THAT THEY MUST SUBMIT TO TOTAL TOTALITARIAN OR COMMUNIST S.S. TYPE, OR GHESTAPO TYPE AUTHORITY ?

I THINK NOT ! !

I NEXT APPEALED THE HEARING AND HAD A COURT DATE WITH THE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE.

THIS JUDGE WAS AN HONORABLE PROFESSIONAL, WHO KINDLY GUIDED ME, AS A NON-PROFESSIONAL ATTORNEY DEFENDING MYSELF, AND GAVE ME PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITY TO TELL MY SIDE OF THE STORY.

UNFORTUNATELY, HE WAS HAVING SOME HEARING DIFFICULTY, AS WAS EVIDENT NUMEROUS TIMES, OF COMMENTS LIKE, "I'M SORRY, I CAN'T HEAR…I DID NOT HEAR THAT…WHAT WAS THE QUESTION?", ON THE COURT TRANSSCRIPT.

AND SINCE THERE WERE NO WITNESSES, HE HAD TO DECIDE THE CASE ON THE BASIS OF WHOM, HE BELIEVED, WAS TELLING THE TRUTH.

MY OPPONENT WENT INTO THE SAME SLANDEROUS, FABRICATED TWISTED VERSION OF THE EVENTS AND I WENT INTO THE AUTHENTIC FORMAL COMPLAINT, FILED THE DAY OF THE EVENT, WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES OF PORT AUTHORITY BUS COMPANY.

I DID NOT EXAGERATE, MISS A DETAIL OR VARY FROM THE TRUTH…..AND YET, THE JUDGE FOUND ME "GUILTY" BECAUSE HE SAID HE HAD TO MAKE A DECISION AND HE DID NOT FIND MY STORY CREDIBLE.

SO ……,THAT'S RIGHT ....! ! I APPEALED ! !

HOW RIDICULOUS ! THAT THIS KIND OF DISHONEST RAILROADING COULD BE OCCURRING AND THE LIAR WAS BEING BELIEVED TO BE THE HONEST ONE!

FOR THE 3RD TRIAL, I HAD TO WAIT OVER A YEAR, BEFORE GETTING A COURT DATE! BUT IT WAS WORTH THE WAIT.
I DID NOT HAVE TOO MUCH TIME TO TALK, BUT I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT IT WAS AN INJUSTICE.

I HAD WRITTEN MY LEGAL BRIEF, WITH SUCH DETAIL AND TORE APART HIS TESTIMONY, LINE BY LINE, THAT ANYONE, WITH A BRAIN, COULD SEE THAT, "IN HIS OWN WORDS", HE REVEALED DISCREPANCY, TWISTING AND LIES OF THE FACTS AND OF HIS OWN PREVIOUS COMMENT ON THE MATTER.

I THINK THAT THIS JUDGE WAS ALREADY CONVINCED THAT I WAS CORRECT IN SAYING THAT THE CHARGE WAS A COVER-UP AND AN INTIMIDATION AND AN OFFENCE APPLICABLE TO THE CHARGE WAS NEVER ENACTED BY ME.

THE ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY WAS ALSO AN HONORABLE MAN, WHO RECOGNIZED, THAT TO COUNTER ANYTHING I SAID, WOULD BE TO DENY THE TRUTH AND REJECT THE VERY PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE.

I THANKED BOTH THE JUDGE AND THE ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, FOR SAYING THAT HE HIMSELF, JUST COULD NOT SEE WERE THE CHARGE WAS APPLICABLE.

SO ENDS ONLY ONE SAGA OF MISERY, BUT MY FAITH, IN THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM HAS BEEN RESTORED, BY A SMALL DEGREE.

THAT'S MUCH BETTER THAN MY PREVIOUS TOTAL LACK OF CONFIDENCE. BUT STILL NOT AS IMPRESSIVE OR CONFIDENT THAT THE FULL EXTENT OF OUR CIVIL, HUMAN AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE BEING FULLY AND CONSTANTLY PROTECTED, BY THOSE ENTRUSTED WITH THIS RESPECT.

WE HAVE TO FIGHT THESE INJUSTICES, EVERYWHERE AND EVERY TIME THEY TRY TO SLEEZE INTO OUR SOCIETY AND DISCRIMINATE, CRIMINALIZE, VICTIMIZE, MINIMALIZE OUR FREEDOM OR DESECRATE OUR RIGHTS.

HATS OFF TO THESE TWO HONORABLE REPRESENTATIVES, OF OUR TRULY CRIPPLED JUDICIAL SYSTEM. – BY DAWN NARET',P.O. BOX 2315, PITTSBURGH, PA 15230 - NOVEMBER 20, 2008

PA GOV. RENDELL REQUESTED TO INVESTIGATE "PRICE FIXING" ON PA LOOSE TOBACCO PRODUCTS




PA GOV. RENDELL REQUESTED TO INVESTIGATE "PRICE FIXING" ON PA LOOSE TOBACCO PRODUCTS

APRIL 1, 2009

INITIAL OPEN LETTER TO THE OFFICE OF:

PA GOVERNOR EDWARD RENDELL

I AM REQUESTING AN INVESTIGATION INTO ILLEGAL PRICE FIXING, VERIFIED TO BE OCCURING IN THE EXTENDED PGH. REGION.

THE PRICE FIXING IS ON LOOSE TOBACCO PRODUCTS. TOBACCO USED TO "ROLL YOUR OWN" ORGANIC CIGARETTES.

IT IS NOT USED ONLY BY THE POOR, BUT ALSO BY HEALTH CONSCIOUS SMOKERS.THE PRICE FOR ONE POUND OF LOOSE TOBACCO, WAS $15. AS OF APRIL 1, 2009, THE PRICE IS $40 AND MORE.

THE REASON GIVEN IS A PA STATE TAX INCREASE.SIGNS, ANNOUNCING THE COMING INCREASE, WERE POSTED 1-2 MONTHS IN ADVANCE IN SEVERAL PGH. NEIGHBORHOODS, ALL THE SAME EXORBINATE AMOUNT.

THEREFORE, THE ILLEGAL ACT OF CONSPIRING TO ILLEGALLYFIX" PRICES, IS ALREADY PROVEN.AN OWNER HAS THE RIGHT TO "SET" ANY PRICE TO CHOOSE......ULTIMATELY, THE RULE OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND WILL FORCE THE PRICE TO AN AMOUNT THAT THE PUBLIC IS WILLING TO PAY.......BUT, WHEN 2 OR MORE OWNERS "CONSPIRE" TO BOTH INCREASE A PRICE, THERE BY ELIMINATING THE RIGHT TO SHOP ELSEWHERE FOR A BETTER PRICE, THIS IS "ILLEGAL CONSPIRING" TO "ILLEGALY FIX PRICES.

I INTERVIEWED THE SQUIRREL HILL NEWSSTAND AND VERIFIED BOTH THE PRICE AND THE DATE SET TO BEGIN THE PRICE HIKE TO BE THE SAME AS OTHER SMALLER STORES, SELLING TOBACCO PRODUCTS IN WILKENBURGH AND OTHER PGH.

NEIGHBORHOODS.THE EXCUSE BEING USED IS "ED RENDELL PUT A NEW TAX ON TOBACCO".

I REQUEST THAT:

1. AN IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION BE INSTITUTED

2. AN INJUNCTION BE SERVED TO STOP THE PRICE INCREASE, PENDING INVESTIGATION

3. THAT ALL PROPRIETORS, GUILTY OF ILLEGAL PRICE FIXING CONSPIRING, LOSE THEIR LICENSE TO SELL TOBACCO, AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF PA STATE TAX REVENUE COLLECTION

4. THAT ALL PROPRIETORS, GUILTY OF ILLEGAL PRICE FIXING CONSPIRING, LOSE THEIR LICENSE TO SELL LOTTO TICKETS, AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF PA STATE GAMBLING COMMISSION COLLECTOR OF REVENUE.

I REQUEST YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER AND WILL ASSIST AS A WITNESS, UPON YOUR REQUEST. I WILL BE WRITING AN ARTICLE FOR

1. "SMOKERS HAVE RIGHTS TOO...." http://www.sokissmybutt.blogspot.com/

2. "WE THE PEOPLE" http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/

3. "DAWN NARET' NEWS" http://www.dawnnaretnews.wordpress.com/

4. PLUS SEVERAL PROFESSIONAL MEDIA OUTLETS THAT ARE INTERESTED IN ANY NEWS WORTHY ISSUES.I HOPE I CAN GIVE AN EARNED DEFENSE, ON BEHALF OF GOVENOR RENDELL, THAT HE IS "NOT GUILTY" OF CAUSING THIS ILLEGAL ACTIVITY AND OBVIOUS "PRICE FIXING".


** ARE THE STORE KEEPERS POSSIBLY VICTIMS OF EXTORTION "PROTECTION MONEY" FROM THE CURRENT ONES, WHO DESTROY BUSINESSES AND INCOME OF U.S. CITIZENS -


SURELY, WITH THE NEW TAX AT:

"ONLY .36 (CENTS) PER POUND OF LOOSE TOBACCO",


THEY WOULD NOT VOLUNTARILY SUBJECT THEMSELVES TO ANGER AND BOYCOTTING BY CUSTOMERS.


PERHAPS, "THEY" WANT AN INVESTIGATION ! !
I ALSO HOPE EVEN MORE, TO DEFEND AND PRAISE HIM, ONE DAY VERY SOON, FOR "BANNING ALL SMOKING BANS" THAT VIOLATE SMOKERS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND ARE CLEARLY PRESENT IN THE DISCRIMINATION, NEGLECT OF EQUAL RIGHTS, AND ILLEGAL HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION, THAT IS BEING ILLEGALLY CONDUCTED, WITH THE ACCEPTANCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS OF SMOKING CITIZENS RIGHTS.


PORNO SHOPS MAY EXIST........BECAUSE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS..........A CITIZEN'S CHOICE TO CONSUME A LEGAL PRODUCT, ANYPLACE, ANYTIME THEY CHOOSE IS JUST AS OBLIGATORY, BY THE "EQUAL" RIGHTS OF THE WRITTEN CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. "MAJORITY RULE" CANNOT CHANGE THAT !


IT IS NOT A "MAJORITY RULE" ISSUE IT IS AN "EQUALITY TO THE RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF CHOICE AND PROTECTION AGAINST HARRASSMENT, BANISHMENT, UNEMPLOYMENT, HOMELESSNESS AND CRIMINALIZATION.



PLEASE SUPPORT PRESIDENT OBAMA, ON CLARIFYING THE RIGHT OF THE F.D.A. TO ASSUME AUTHORITY THAT IT ALREADY HAD, UNDER GOV. RESPONSIBILITY TO ASSUME REGULATION OF TOBACCO COMPANIES, TO PROTECT CITIZENS FROM HARMFUL CHEMICALS BEING ADDED TO ANY CONSUMABLE PRODUCTS, IF THE COMPANIES HAVE CONTINUED TO REFUSE TO POLICE THEMSELVES ACCEPTABLY AND HAVE CONTINUED TO ADD CANCER CAUSING ADDITIVES TO TOBACCO.


TOBACCO IS A FULLY GROWN, ALREADY DEVELOPED, HARVESTED, HEALTHY ORGANIC NATURAL VEGETATION OF GOD.


IT NEEDS NO ADDITIVES OR "PRODUCTION".
THEY HAVE NEVER HAD THE "RIGHT TO DECIDE ON THEIR OWN INGREDIENTS", BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT "PRODUCING" THE TOBACCO......IT IS ALREADY PRODUCED, THE SAME AS A FOOD PRODUCT AND IS ONLY BEING "ILLEGALLY TAMPERED" WITH TO CREATE ADDICTION AND FASTER CONSUMPTION FOR INCREASED PROFITS.


WHAT THEY HAVE BEEN DOING IS THE SAME AS INJECTING A POISONOUS CHEMICAL INTO EVERY ORANGE THAT IS SOLD AND DEMANDING THE RIGHT TO DESIGN THEIR OWN FORMULA.


THIS IS TAMPERING WITH NATURAL ORGANIC PRODUCTS, THAT ARE "CONSUMED", THROUGH INHALING INTO THE LUNGS, ABSORBED INTO THE BLOOD AND ENTERED INTO THE BRAIN AND EVERY BODY CELL. IT FALLS UNDER ALL ITEMS THAT ARE INSPECTED AND REGULATED FOR PUBLIC SAFTEY.


THEY NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH PUTTING A WARNING NOTE ON THE PACKAGE,


...IF IT IS "HARMFUL TO THE HEALTH", THEN GET IT THE HELL OUT OF THERE ! !


THEN WE CAN "BAN ALL BANS" AGAINST SMOKING, WITHOUT ANY DANGER OF EXPOSURE TO CARCINOGENS !


THANK YOU,

Dawn Naret'

authordawnnaret@gmail.com





LETTER TO RENDELL WARNING OF INTERNET TRESPASSES ON "HIS" WEB-SITE ! !

APRIL 1, 2009

SECOND/ADDITIONAL OPEN LETTER TO THE OFFICE OF:

PA GOVERNOR EDWARD RENDELL –

MSG: YOU ARE NOT GETTING ALL YOUR COMMUNICATION !

THERE ARE “DUMMY SITES ACCEPTING CALLS AND EMAILS TO YOU ! !ARE THEY STEALING YOUR CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS ?

ARE THEY LEAVING YOU IN THE DARK, ON COMMUNICATED CITIZENS' CONCERNS AND LOOKING STUPID AND INEFFICIENT ?

THIS IS WHAT THE CURRENT CRIMINAL ELEMENT OF THE "ENEMIES OF AMERICA" HAVE BEEN DOING TO CITIZENS NATIONALLY. IMPOSTERING, DESTROYING REPUTATIONS, INTERUPTING INCOMES, FORCING BUSINESSES INTO BANKRUPTCY, DIVERTING COMMUNICATIONS, DIVERTING/ANGERING CUSTOMERS, CRIMINALIZING, SLANDERING, FALSE WITNESSING AND CAUSING UNEMPLOYMENT AND HOMELESSNESS -


THE PAGE WAS GRABBED AND ADDRESSES AND PHONE NUMBERS CHANGED, AS I TRIED TO SEND THE GOVERNOR A REQUEST FOR HELP !


THE EMAIL "SEND" FUNCTION WAS ALSO CUT OFF, BY THE SQUIRREL HILL CARNEGIE LIBRARY "WIZARD" EMAIL-SEND BLOCKING PROGRAM, THEN YOU WOULD BE FORCED TO HARDMAIL TO ONE OF THERE "DUMMY" ADDRESSES OR CALL ONE OF THEIR "DUMMY" PHONE LINES.....AND THE GOVERNOR WOULD NEVER KNOW THAT YOU SENT HIM A CHECK OR CONCERN !

308 MAIN CAPITAL BLDG., HARRISBURGH, PA 17120
(also listed as 225 main capital bldg. – which is the dummy page?)

PHONE: 717-783-1116
(also listed as 787-2500 which is the dummy page?)

FAX: 717-772-8462
(also listed as 772-8284- which is the dummy page?)

THIS ONE LOOKS SUSPICIOUS..........................
Your url address got changed, by imposters to :.Blogger.com/http:www.governor.state.us*

THIS “BLOGGER.COM" REPLACEMENT OF THE URL I HAD TYPED IN , OCCURRED MULTIPLE TIMES.

IT MIGHT JUST BE THE SERVER HANDLING THE DIRECT LINK OF EMAIL TO GOV. CORRECT ADDRESS......

OR IT COULD BE CHANGING THAT ADDRESS TO LAND AT A DIFFERENT MAILBOX.

THEY WOULD NOT ALLOW THE TRUE WEB URL TO BE LINKED TO ! EVEN WITH THE ACTUAL SITE INCLUDED, IN THE URL, IT DOES NOT LINK. IT OPENS AN ERROR PAGE AND BLOCKS COMMUNICATION!

THE ERROR PAGE OFFERS AN ALTERNATE LINK ATTEMPT, BUT THE LINK IS A DUMMY PAGE ! – NOT THE AUTHENTIC WEB SITE.


THIS ONE LOOKS EVEN "MORE" SUSPICIOUS:
IT ALSO GETS LISTED AS:

www.governor.state.pa.us/server/portal.pt/community//govenor/%27s_web_site/2985

(which is the dummy address? – ** )

THE ABOVE ONE MAY EVEN "I.D." THE "RECIEVER" OF DIVERTED MAIL! !

This new posting is also an example of trespass and illegal censorship, that is occuring at the Carnegie Library, Squirrel Hill, Pa.

The URL of the Gov. address was changed, so that it would not link.

Then the address was assigned a"dummy page" URL (an illegal page impostering itself to be an authentic website) that does not link it to the real page of Gov. Rendell, which has an email contact.

It linked to the "illegal duplicate" page that requires you to send email via a "wizard" pop-up email screen.

This "wizard" program blocks the public users from sending any email at all. IT requires a set-up and then rejects the user's access from setting-up without a staff password.


The staff says it can only enter passwords for their own email activity.

It also tampered with my text and made everything, that was already designed and saved on word, to be centered, and also "crunched" shut the paragraph spacing, so you have to waste time respacing.

This is a constant trespass, on every "cut and paste" action attempted here. they are conducting criminal activity.

GOVERNOR, PLEASE BECOME A HERO........

WE NEED YOU TO INITIATE ACTION TO FORCE THE F.T.C. TO ACCEPT IT'S RESPONSIBILITY, AND ENFORCE THE ALREADY EXISTING LAWS OF NO IMPOSTERING, TRESSPASSING, STEALING, ABUSE, OR TERRORIZING PERMITTED ON FTC REGULATED PHONE LINES.


ALL INTERNET CONNECTIONS REQUIRE PHONE LINE SERVER CONNECTION ! !


THE CRIMINALS HAVE BEEN GETTING AWAY WITH ALL THIS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, BECAUSE THEY HAVE EVERYONE BUFFALOED INTO BELIEVING THAT "THE LAWS HAVE NOT EVOLVED OR CAUGHT UP WITH THE TECHNOLOGY...." OR "THERE IS NO CURRENT LAW WE CAN USE TO PROSECUTE THEM....."


BUNK!

THE LONG STANDING FTC LAWS APPLY, BECAUSE THEY ARE DEPENDANT ON THE TELEPHONE ROUTING AND CONNECTION SYSTEM AND THAT MAKES THEM LIABLE TO COMPLIANCE TO ALL FTC LAWS, ALREADY ON THE BOOKS.


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH !

WE ARE ALL WITH YOU!


WE ARE TIRED OF TRESPASS AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITY GOING UNCHECKED AND UNPROSECUTED !

I am attempting to get the true website :http://www.governor.state.pa.us/posted and functioning. -

Dawn Naret'
authordawnnaret@gmail.com


ATTENTION ! ATTENTION ! !

NOTE: You are currently at: http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/
at the blogspot named "WE THE PEOPLE" Authored by Dawn Naret', Pittsburgh, Pa.


CLICK MY BLOG LINKS FOR "DUBYA D.C. USA" at: http://www.authordawnnaret.blogspot.com/
for the first article (MISSING FROM HERE) and read:

"BUTTERFLIES 8 G. DUBYA". It is written in my "HICK HUMOR" lingo, so please do not feel that I am 2 different people. If the hick phonetics require too much effort for you to comprehend....BITE ME !

It is a PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT that is extremely important: That our "HOME- LAND -SECURITY" is not able to visualize the urgency of the dangers, we are already coping with, as citizens in this country.

They ARE NOT arriving through the airports or cargo shipments. THEY ARE HERE NOW ! And our Protectors are not mentally or" crisis oriented" enough to recognize the true facts of the situations or make competent plans for securing our saftey. I am one of their VICTIMS....

They are NOT Muslims....They are natural and naturalized and imposterized Americans of many races, religions and national origins and they are ANTI-AMERICAN ENEMIES OF THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT AND OF THE AMERICAN CITIZENS. Too many already have jobs in the U.S. Government and State Government departments. They try to appear to be good folks doing good deeds, but all their deeds hurt someone elses life, and are only a facade.

I would be happy to give instruction and full testimony to any loyal American that might have connection to a Federal Agency who would listen with an unprejudiced, intelligent ear and get us some defensive action and preparation, on the correct track. They are not doing one thing that will stop the ENEMIES OF AMERICA from seizing this country.

My emails are usually stolen or answered by an imposter, my web work, done in the public library, is usually obstructed, stolen, or sabotaged, that I have to re-do it. But RE-DO I WILL. I WILL NOT back down and submit to them !!

My hard mail address is Dawn Naret', P.O. Box 2315, Pittsburgh, Pa 15230.
My phone is constantly under surveilence and calls and messages diverted to some forwarded place that I don't even try to communicate with it.

My hard mail has frequently been stolen or held from me for as long as 3-5 months, before I find it all together on one days deliverywith 6 months of post marks. I am being censored, stalked, physically abused and possibly impersonated.

I started doing 2 of my web sites, using my "COMICAL HICK" style of writing, just to get people to enjoy them, so they would visit my blogs. I also give myself a positive, mentally healthy outlet from all this stress, through the authoring of my blog sites. I live, homeless, in the street, in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood of Pittsburgh, Pa in the area of Forbes and Murray Ave. "Arefa's Coffee Cafe" and some of "The Coffee Tree" folks know me by name and site and some of the local library folks can identify me, I was taken out of the library to the hospital recently..

Recently, while trying to publish a new piece, I was so interupted and CENSORED AND OBSTRUCTED FROM PUBLISHING, that I had to fight constantly, to publish it and lost my sense of "HICK HUMOR" completely. Some things hit too hard on the heart and gut to make lite of.

I also had to change my workpad blog address, because, it was "dawnnaret.workpad.com, but someone is constantly trying to steal my name and I got it to publish under its new address of:

dawnnaretblog.workpad.com
(so they've stolen yet another address with my name on it.) Now, the Library has set up a "closed, due to pornography" screen to block "we the people", which is my most patriotic blog site. They say that the screen is only popped up on this premisis, for child protection, and does not block view of the site from outside the Library.

But, what are the children supposed to be getting protected from, when all that is on that site is, copies of the declaration of independence and the constitution.

What does that tell us of what they consider unacceptable to view? Are they trying to get these children raised without becoming aware of freedom and citizen's rights? Or are they just trying to block ME from being able to enter and write articles etc.

The librarians, on the floor, have kindly over-ridden the system and let me into my own patriotic blog site, to write and edit. But publishing takes alot of back and forth, from the editing area to the front screen, to view if it came out the way you wanted. Everytime I want to switch screens, I was supposed to call them for help to re-do the over-ride, so I could see my blog.

As poor people, who cannot afford our own computers, We only get 30 min. sign-on slots. How much work could I accomplish with this intentional inconvenience set up against my accomplishment, by the ones in the back, who trespass into all my accounts and switch addresses around and steal my e-mail and try to steal my accounts that have my name as the address?? I have published a complaint with a sample notice that says my e-mail function has been disabled. Why?

I have been fighting, for years, these trespasses and have wasted years of attempting to do job search on-line, only to realize now, that all this time, these criminal activities have been in action and sabotaging my efforts to survive this black-listed, imposed poverty that has already ruined my health and continues to deteriorate my hopes of returning to a basic normal lifestyle ever, before I die prematurely and with pre-meditated malice.

The Library staff is not working alone in these evil endeavors, there are several street gang criminal elements that are paid daily fees to stalk citizens and do computer trespasses to gather info for stealing identity, properties and businesses. They gather the info for white collar business investors who take advantage of the state of terrorism created by the paid gangs and the staff people, who are convinced that what they are doing is co-operating with a legal plan of government activity and usually the government is not even involved, only imposters of the government are. But the government is aware of the depleting populations, businesses and taxpayer numbers and cannot claim to be totally unaware of terrorism against the U.S. citizens.

They will not help us because they are decieved as to what is going on. They are not aware of all the inter-connected quid pro quo, between the thieves, the false witnesses, the instigators and the persecutors.

It is despicable that such terroristic tactics are being acted against innocent citizens.

you should read it..
At the link for: "Dubya D.C. USA"

http://www.authordawnnaret.blogspot.com/

ALSO PUBLISHED AT "DAWNNARET.WORDPRESS.COM"
(see direct link to specific articles on side bar - butterflies is last on the list)

WHILE THERE....READ "BAN ALL BANS" AND "TO GRANT SMOKERS RIGHTS OR NON-SMOKERS WRONGS ! "

http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com/




"www.mikesfreegifs.com" - gif credit acknowledgement

"www.mikesfreegifs.com" - gif credit acknowledgement
Male, 40 years old, Atlanta Georgia, USA

VIEW SLIDE SHOW - (1 MINUTE) "VICTORIAN CHILDREN" BY DAWN NARET' 5/30/08

"Victorian Children"]

MODERN-DAY CHILDREN - MODERN FATHER'S ACHIEVEMENTS ! !


CREDIT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT GIVEN FOR MY BEST .GIF ART POSTED


CHECK OUT HIS GREAT SITE AT:

http://www.mikesfreegifs.com/

MIKE DESCRIBES HIMSELF AS:

"Male 40 years old ATLANTA, Georgia, United States"

NOTE:

MIKE LETS YOU POST HIS .GIFS FOR FREE, AS LONG AS YOU ALSO POST THE LINK LINE TO HIS WEB SITE, TO BRING HIM MORE VISITORS. MIKE GRATFULLY ACCEPTS DONATIONS, FOR THE TIME HE SPENDS GATHERING THESE .GIFS, OF HIS OWN AND SOME DONE BY OTHERS AND ACCEPTS CUSTOM ORDERS FOR PRIVATE CONTRACT .GIFS OR FULL SCENERY GAME OR WEB-PAGE DISPLAY -

US WAVING FLAG



"WE THE PEOPLE"

"WE THE PEOPLE"

COMMON MONARC BUTTERFLY

COMMON MONARC BUTTERFLY
LOOK FOR THIS PHOTO, TO SCROLL TO ARTICLE, "BUTTERFLIES 8 G. DUBYA"

BABY CADILLAC

BABY CADILAC FOR CROWN PRINCE OLAF
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rMgxEN3Kfg

REPEAT INTENTION OF: -“ WE THE PEOPLE “

In “WE THE PEOPLE”, I intend to voice complaint of injustices, expose examples, of the same where possible, publicize the facts and expand awareness of the problems and those responsible, share some humor, some irony and some love
…………………………………………………………………DAWN NARET’

1960 - 1963 PRESIDENT J.F.KENNEDY

IKE/KENNEDY/CUBAN MISSLE CRISIS


1924 CALVIN COOLIDGE - 1933 F.D. ROOSEVELT - 1955 D.D. EISENHOUR

1924 PRESIDENT CALVIN COOLIDGE


F.D. ROOSEVELT INAUGURATION SPEECH 1930


I LIKE IKE




IKE- COST OF LIVING




KENNEDY - THE CUBAN MISSLE CRISIS - PART 1




KENNEDY - QUICK VIEW OF 13 DAYS OF CUBAN MISSLE CRISIS

13 Days OF CUBAN MISSLE CRISIS



FUNERAL OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY




JAQUELIN KENNEDY THANKS THE PUBLIC


L. B. JOHNSON CALLS JACKIE KENNEDY








PART 2 - KENNEDY CUBAN MISSLE CRISIS

PART 2

"I HAVE A DREAM"

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR.-I HAVE A DREAM



MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. ON WAR

MLK-ON WAR






MARTIN LUTHER KING JR/MALCOME X








I PROPOSE WE MOVE THE "G-20" SUMMIT TO THE SUBURBS !, BY DAWN NARET'









I PROPOSE WE MOVE THE "G-20" SUMMIT TO THE SUBURBS !, BY DAWN NARET', P.O. BOX 2315, PITTSBURGH, PA 15230

IN THE BEGINNING, THERE WAS NEWS..............
AND THE NEWS WAS GOOD.............................
THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP OF 20 WORLD LEADERS WOULD HOLD THEIR SUMMIT IN PITTSBURGH.........................
HOORAH ! HOORAH ! WE CAN HANDLE IT!............
WE HAVE A CONVENTION CENTER !...................

BUT IT NEVER HOUSED THIS TYPE OF TOP LEVEL VISITORS AND SECURITY NEEDS.............WHAT TO DO ? WHAT TO DO ?...........

MOVE THE G-20 SUMMIT TO THE SUBURBS.................POSSIBLY C.C.A.C. - BOYCE CAMPUS, WITH THESE FOLLOWING AMMENITIES OF COMPETITIVE LURES.......

- NO DOWNTOWN CLOSE DOWNS OR CHAOS
- NO DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS INCONVENIENCES
- NO DOWNTOWN EMPLOYEE INCONVENIENCE
- NO DOWNTOWN INNER-PERAMETER BUSINESS SHUT DOWNS OR LOST REVENUE
- NO DOWNTOWN OUTER PERIMETER CONGESTION BY PROTESTERS
- NO DOWNTOWN OUTER PERIMETER RE-ROUTING OF BUSES OR TRAFFIC
- NO DOWNTOWN EXTRA-OUTER PERIMETER MISSED DAYS WORK OR TARDINESS, BY EMPLOYEES TRYING TO COMMUTE PASSED THE DOWNTOWN CHAOS ON BUSES THAT MUST STILL GET THROUGH THE TRAFFIC CHAOS AND RE-ROUTING
ETC.............ETC................ETC.

NOW LETS LOOK AT THE POSITIVE ASPECTS OF A "SUBURBAN SUMMIT" !

ONLY 15-20% AS MUCH SPECIAL PLANNING AND ARRANGEMENTS REQUIRED

TIGHTER SECURITY POTENTIAL, WITH ONLY 2 ROADS ACCESSING THE CAMPUS

EXTRA MEDIA PARKING

A 4 DAY WEEK-END FOR STUDENTS AND FACULTY - HOORAH ! THEREFORE NO ONE COMPLAINING ABOUT ALL THE INCONVENIENCE !

DOWNTOWN CITIZENS KISSING THE FEET OF THE MAYOR WHO WAS WISE ENOUGH TO LOOK OUT FOR THEIR INTERESTS AND PROTECT THEM FROM ALL THE INCONVENIENCE, THE TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND EVEN THE POSSIBLE BANNING OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH PROTESTERS, WHO JUST TOOK UP TOO MUCH ROOM IN THE CONGESTION OUTSIDE OF THE ALREADY CLOSED AREAS !
A MAYOR WHO IS PROTECTING EVERYONE - EVEN THEIR RIGHT TO HOLD PROTEST.........IN A LESS INTRUSIVE SPACE !

OPEN LANDING SITES AVAILABLE FOR HELICOPTER TRANSPORT FOR FASTER AND MORE SECURE ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES OF PERTINENT VISITORS AND SECURITY PERSONNEL.

NEAR-BY BOYCE PARK IN VICINITY, FOR DEMONSTRATORS TO ORGANIZE AND GIVE MEDIA INTERVIEWS (IF THEY PROMISE TO BE GOOD AND NICE TO THE G-20 PLANNING COMMITTEE - TV COVERAGE CAN BE ARRANGED, IF THEY DO NOT EMBARRASS PITTSBURGHERS, WITH THEIR INCONSIDERATE INSISTENCE OF DEMONSTRATING AT AN INAPPROPRIATE TIME AND GLOBAL FUNCTION PURPOSE - MAN, PUT A LID ON IT AND LET THIS OCCUR. IT IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN YOUR CELEBRATY ! - DO NOT EMBARRASS PITTSBURGH, AS THOUGH WE ARE IMMATURE, UNINTELLECTUAL AND TUNNEL VISIONED INSTEAD OF GLOBAL BENEFIT MINDED ! )

THERE'S MY GAME PLAN BOYS...........JUST DO IT ! ! !

ATTENTION ! ATTENTION !
SEPTEMBER 19, 2009 - ADD-ON:

I READ TODAY, THAT THERE IS NOW A POSSIBILITY THAT UP TO 500 BUDDIST MONKS ALSO ARE HEADING TO PITTSBURGH TO RALLY AT THE G-20 SUMMIT.......WHY ?

EASY ! THIS IS EXACTLY THE EXAMPLE I NEEDED TO GET THIS EVENT INTO PROPER PERSPECTIVE, FOR THOSE WHO ARE LOSTT IN THE LOCAL AGENDA LAND !

FIRST OF ALL THEY NEED TO SHAKE THE DELUSION THAT THIS IS A PITTSBURGH EVENT. IT IS NOT, THERE WILL BE NOTHING ON THE AGENDA, THAT WILL BE DISCUSSING PITTSBURGH ISSUES.

IT IS A GLOBAL SUMMIT OF WORLD LEADERS, WHO JUST HAPPENED TO DECIDE THAT PITTSBURGH MIGHT BE A NICE PLACE TO JOIN TOGETHER, FOR THEIR MEETINGS AND DISCUSSIONS ON POSSIBLY, WORLD ECONOMY, THE PRESERVATION AND STABLIZATION OF THE VALUE OF THE EURO-DOLLAR, THE POSSIBLE DEVALUATION OF THE U.S. DOLLAR, SANCTIONS AGAINST IRAN AND CUBA, THE CONTINUING EFFORTS TO AVOID ESCALATIONS TOWARD WORLD WAR III, THE CONCERN THAT IRAN MAY BE DEVELOPING NUCLEAR WEAPONS.........BIG ISSUES ! THEY ARE NOT HERE TO LISTEN TO WHAT PITTSBURGHERS THINK ABOUT ANYTHING !

NOW, WITH THEIR PURPOSE CLARIFIED, WE NEED TO LOOK AT HOW THEIR ARRIVAL IS BEING USED OR EXPLOITED BY GROUPS THAT HAVE BEEN REGISTERING COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE RIGHT TO PROTEST.

THIS IS A BIGGER PROBLEM, THAN I BELIEVE THE LOCAL POLITICOS ARE CREDITING IT TO BE. WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE? MANY, I'M SURE, HAVE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS, THAT THEY BELIEVE WILL IMPROVE LIFE SITUATIONS FOR OTHERS. GOD BLESS THEM AND GOOD LUCK TO THEIR EFFORTS. I AM SURE THAT THEY ARE NOT AT ALL "PROTESTING" OR COMPLAINING THAT THE G-20 WILL BE PRESENT HERE, OR ANY OF THE SUBJECT MATTERS THAT THE G-20 WILL BE DISCUSSING.. SO WHY ARE WE CALLING THEM "PROTESTERS" ?

I THINK WE SHOULD VIEW THEM AS "LOBBYISTS" TO MORE CORRECTLY COMPREHEND THEIR MOTIVATIONS. NOW, I MUST SAY, THAT I STILL CONSIDER THIS SUMMIT, AN INAPPROPRIATE TIME TO PUSH "LOBBY ISSUES" ONTO THE TABLE OF DISCUSSION. BUT I AM EVEN MORE OPPOSED TO THE SLOWING EVOLVING EVIDENCE, THAT WE HAVE AMONG THOSE "LOBBYISTS", A FACTION OF APPARENT "CHAOS CREATORS", WHO HAVE BEEN PHONING AND ATTEMPTING TO PULL EVEN MORE THOUSANDS OF "LOBBYISTS" INTO PITTSBURGH FOR THE 2 DAY PERIOD.

THE NEWS, THIS MORNING, OF THAT GROUP, OF UP TO 500 TIBETAN MONKS, ALREADY HEADING TO PITTSBURGH, TO PROTEST THEIR TREATMENT BY CHINA, BURSTS FORTH THE REALITY OF THE COMING SITUATION AND JAMS IT IN TO STIR CLARITY OF OUR FUZZY, STUMBLING BRAINS, BETTER THAN ANY OTHER EXAMPLE I COULD USE TO REVEAL THE URGENCY, OF MY PLEA TO THE ADMINISTRATORS, TO MOVE THIS EVENT TO THE SUBURBS.

I READ THAT IT WAS ANNOUNCED BY AN AMERICAN, WHO PROBABLY SUGGESTED IT TO THEIR GROUP............AND TO HOW MANY OTHER GROUPS...............THAT THEY DESCEND ONTO PITTSBURGH. WE COULD HAVE A VERY MEAN INTENTIONED EFFORT TRYING TO ORGANIZE ABSOLUTE CHAOS HERE, WITH AN EXORBINATE NUMBER OF OUT OF TOWNERS PLANNING TO ARRIVE FOR THE SAME 2 DAY EVENT.

WE HAVE TO RE-ADJUST THE THOUGHT PROCESS TO BE PREPARED FOR UNTOLD NUMBERS OF VISITORS. THE ESTIMATED GUESS WAS ONLY ABOUT 10% OF WHAT THE REALITY WILL BE.

THESE MONKS ARE AN EXAMPLE, THAT THEY ARE NOT EVEN FROM THIS COUNTRY, BUT ARE INTERESTED IN EXPLOITING THE PRESCENSE OF THESE GLOBAL LEADERS SUMMIT TO HAVE A "PHOTO OPPORTUNITY" WITH GLOBAL MEDIA COVERAGE OF THE EVENT.

THAT'S ALL ANY OF THESE GROUPS ARE DOING. THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO SNATCH A "PHOTO OPPORTUNITY" DURING A GLOBAL EVENT, TO ANNOUNCE AND PROMOTE THEIR ISSUES AND AGENDAS.

I TRULY DO NOT THINK THAT THE G-20 PLANNERS HAVE HAD A CORRECT HANDLE ON ALL OF THIS MOTIVE AND PROBABLE OUTCOME. THEY HAVE BEEN MISDIRECTED TO TRY TO SHOW HOW NICE OUR CITY IS........NO ONE REALLY CARES, EXCEPT MAYBE PRESIDENT OBAMA, WHO INITIATED THE LOCATING OF THE SUMMIT IN PITTSBURGH, IN ORDER TO ASSIST PITTSBURGH IN GLOBALIZING THEIR DETERMINED "METROPOLITAN IMAGE" SETTING.

BUT, NOW WE HAVE MORE AND MORE GROUPS PLANNING TO ARRIVE, TO A NEIGHBORHOOD THAT ALREADY WAS MAX SPACED-OUT AND CONGESTED. WE LOST SPACE TO SECURITY ROPE-OFF AND STREET CLOSE-DOWNS AND BEYOND THE NO-ACCESS PERIMETER, WE HAVE PLANNED PEDESTRIAN CONGESTION OF "LOBBYISTS" STANDING IN THE STREETS, BLOCKING TRAFFIC FLOW OF THE ACCESSIBLE INNER-PERIMETER, AND NOW MORE AND MORE ANNOUNCEMENTS OF INCREASED PLANNED GROUP ATTENDANCE, THAT WILL TOTALLY EXPAND THAT ACCESSIBLE INNER-PERIMETER TO EXCEED THE BOUNDRIES OF THE OUTER-ACCESSIBLE AREAS AND CREATE A TOTAL SHUT-DOWN OF TRAFFIC FLOW AS FAR BACK AS OAKLAND, SQUIRREL HILL, EAST LIBERTY AND BLOOMFIELD!

WE CANNOT CONSCIOUSLY CONSIDER GAMBLING LIVES TO THIS POSSIBILITY OF MAXED-OUT MASSIVE CHAOS.

WHAT IF..................WE NEEDED TO EVACUATE THE CITY ?

WHAT IF.....................WE EVEN HAD A FIRE WITH-IN THE NO-ACCESS PERIMITER? IT WOULD BE IMMPOSSIBLE TO REACH OR CLEAR FOR MOVEMENT OF EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT.

WE MUST FOCUS 24/7/365 ON THE NEED TO MAINTAIN EMERGENCY ACCESS AND THE POSSIBILITY OF THE NEED FOR EVACUATION. BUT AT A GLOBAL EVENT, LIKE THIS, WE MUST PLACE IT AT AN EVEN HIGHER LEVEL OF "OCCURRENCE POSSIBILITY".

THE DOWNTOWN PLANNING MUST CEASE.

WE MUST MOVE THIS TO THE SUBURBS. THESE PEOPLE ARE DETERMINED TO HAVE THEIR 15 MINUTES OF FAME TO PROMOTE THEIR AGENDAS......LET THEM HAVE IT !


BUT, PITTSBURGH ADMISTRATORS MUST HAVE CONTROL OF IT AND THE ONLY WAY TO HAVE CONTROL OF IT IS TO PLAN FOR A POSITIVE APPROACH TO THE INCREASING AND PRESSING NEEDS OF THESE CROWDS.

LET'S ASSUME THAT MY SUGGESTION FOR C.C.A.C.-BOYCE, AND BOYCE PARK ARE ACCEPTABLE AS THE IDEAL LOCATIONS TO ACCOMODATE BOTH THE SECURITY NEEDS FOR THE G-20 ATTENDEES AND THE MASSIVE PERSONAL NEEDS OF THE GROWING NUMBERS OF "LOBBYISTS" AND CURIOSITY ON-LOOKERS.

WE ALREADY HAVE SECURITY PLANS AND MINUTE BY MINUTE FUNCTIONS FOR THE MEETINGS COMPLETED. JUST ERASE ALL THE SHUT-DOWN AND BUS AND TRAFFIC REROUTING PLANS AND RELAX WITH THE LAND SECURITY CONVENIENCE OF ONLY 2 ROADS THAT ENTER THE C.C.A.C. CAMPUS.

ADD HELICOPTER AVAILABILTY REGISTERING AND SCHEDULING AND THE SUMMIT IS HANDLED.

NOW, ANNOUNCE IMMED. THE CHANGE IN LOCATION TO GET THE OTHERS AWAY FROM THE CITY. MAKE THE NEW LOCATION WELL KNOWN. PREPARE THE PARK AS THOUGH YOU WERE PREPARING TO OPEN IT FOR A "WOODSTOCK" TYPE EVENT.

HAVE P.A.T. CREATE A TEMPORARY "G-20-BOYCE PARK" SHUTTLE BUS ROUTE THAT A HAS FREQUENT SCHEDULE THAT WILL GET THEM OUT OF THE CITY AS FAST AS THEY ARRIVE. THE SHUTTLE SHOULD BE AN EXPRESS RUN FROM OAKLAND CRAIG AND FORBES TO RT. 22 MONROEVILL MALL, MIRACLE MILE SHOPPING CENTER AND BOYCE PARK . PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF AT ALL 3 STOPS.

ORDER 100-300 "PORTABLE JOHNNIES" FOR BOYCE PARK - (AND PUT AT LEAST 20 IN POINT STATE PARK FOR INCREASED WANDERING TOURISM).

PREPARE A MEDIA STAGE, WITH ELECTRICAL ACCEPTABILITY, FOR "LOBBYIST ISSUE ORATION". GIVE THEM THE CHANCE TO SPEAK. GIVE THEM MEDIA PERSONNEL TO SPEAK TO. GIVE THEM A REASON TO STAY AWAY FROM THE CAMPUS, BUT STILL EXPLOIT THE EVENT ENOUGH TO SATISFY THEM.

ESTABLISH A "WELCOME", "CAN WE HELP YOU" ATTITUDE BY CROWD CONTROL PERSONNEL.

OPEN ALL RESTRICTION, IN THE PARK: TENTS ARE O.K. OVERNIGHT IS O.K. FROM 6 P.M. WEDNESDAY UNTIL 6 P.M. FRIDAY.

PROVIDE 300-500 ADDITIONAL LITTER CANS.

SET UP A MEDICAL EMERGENCY TENT, IN THE PARK.

SET UP A "SECURITY AND PUBLIC ASSISTANCE" TENT TO SERVE SAFETY AND COMPLAINT NEEDS. THERE WILL BE NO ARRESTING UNLESS THERE EXISTS A USUAL CRIMINAL ACTIVITY OF PURSE-SNATCHING, AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR ETC.

SET UP 2-3 HUGE "PUBLIC SHELTER" TENTS IN CASE OF HEAVY RAIN.

CUT PAYROLL AND UTILIZE MILITARY PERSONNEL TO CONDUCT "FOOT PATROLS FOR SAFETY" 24 HRS. FOR THE 3 NIGHTS AND 2 DAYS OF THE EVENT.


PROVIDE 2-3 UNMANNED FOOD PREP AND GATHERING TENTS, FOR USE BY VISITING GROUPS, TO BRING THEIR OWN SUPPLIES TO.

DIVIDE THE PARK INTO SECTIONS AND ASSIGN REGISTERED GROUPS TO SPECIFIC IDENTIFIED SECTIONS. ALL PERMANENT PAVILLIONS MUST REMAIN OPEN TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND NOT JUST GROUPS ON SITE. GROUPS ARE ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEAN-UP OF THEIR AREA.

THESE ARE THE MAJOR CONCERNS AND SUGGESTIONS I HAVE. THE MINOR ONES WILL FALL INTO PLACE, WITH AN APPROPRIATE ATTITUDE CHANGE TO "WELCOME, MAY WE BE OF ASSISTANCE ?".

PITTSBURGH COULD GO DOWN AS THE MODEL OF "PROPER CROWD HANDLING" WITH NO VIOLENT OUT-BREAKS, NO TRAFFIC INTERRUPTIONS, THE MOST SAFE AND SECURE ENVIRONMENTS FOR HONORABLE, LARGE GATHERINGS AND A DARN NICE PLACE TO VISIT OR RELOCATE TO ! ETC. ETC. ETC. ISN'T THIS WHAT WE ALWAYS HOPE TO ACHIEVE ?

LOVE, DAWN NARET’, P.O. BOX 2315, PGH., PA, 15230

http://www.pittsburghnews.wordpress.com/

http://www.authordawnnaret.blogspot.com/

http://www.bydawnnaret.blogspot.com/




OCTOBER, 2009 - POST SUMMIT:

THE SUMMIT WAS INDEED HELD IN THE CENTER CITY, OF PITTSBURGH. CONCERN FOR THE CONTINUED FUNCTIONALITY, OF CITY RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES, WAS TOTALLY DISREGARDED.

ALL DOWNTOWN BUSINESSES, IN THE SUMMIT AREA, WERE FORCED TO CLOSE OR REMAIN OPEN WITH NO CUSTOMERS, BECAUSE TRAFFIC TO THEIR SITE WAS EXCESSIVELY RESTRICTED.


LOCAL RESIDENTS, UNIVERSITY STUDENTS AND PEACEFUL PROTESTERS WERE ALL TREATED WITH DISREGARD AND NON-GRACIOUS HERDING. THERE EXISTED A MILITANT SIEGE ENVIRONMENT WITH RESTRICTION OF ASSEMBLEDGE AND MOBILITY.

I ACTUALLY HAD A FRIGHTENING DE'JA VUE OF KENT STATE UNIVERSITY AND TIANANMEN SQUARE.


IF IT HAD BEEN HELD IN THE SUBURBS.........80% OF THE INCONVENIENCE, PERSONNEL, EXPENSE AND "LOST" OPPORTUNITIES, TO WELCOME AND IMPRESS VISITORS, COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED.


JUST BECAUSE WE WERE NOT BOMBED, BLASTED OR LOOTED, I DO NOT CONSIDER IT A SUCCESSFUL OR APPROPRIATLY HANDLED EVENT, WE THREW AWAY SO MUCH OPPORTUNITY TO MANAGE IT, AS A JOYOUS CELEBRATION OF FREE SPEECH, OF ENTERTAINMENT AND OF A POTENTIAL "WE-LOVE-AMERICA-AND-WILL-DEFEND-IT", BONDING OF THE VISITING MASSES AND FUTURE, POTENTIAL NEW RESIDENTS. LIKE A "MINI-WOODSTOCK" !


WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN SO TERRIBLE ?

THEY "MANAGED" HALF A MILLION PEOPLE, FOR 3 DAYS STRAIGHT, WITH NO VIOLENCE ! THE ENTERTAINMENT WAS A DETERRENT AND IT WAS "IN THE SUBURBS" WITH NO GLASS WINDOWS TO BREAK.

MAYBE WE SHOULD HAVE HIRED "CHEECH AND CHONG", INSTEAD OF 7000 RIOT DRESSED "MEN-OF-WAR-AND-HERO-QUEST".

INSTEAD, OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT CHOSE EXCESSIVE "DELTA DUMMIES" MANAGMENT, OVER BEING A GRACIOUS AND HOSPITABLE HOST.


THE "DELTA BOYS" KNOW WHAT I MEAN. IT CHANGES YOU, FROM A RESPECTABLE PROTECTOR AND ENFORCER, OF CIVIL LAWS, TO AN "EXTERMINATOR" ROBOT WITH NO BRAIN, WHO DOES "IT", JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE SAYS SO, AND IS EVEN WILLING TO DO "IT", TO THEIR OWN PEOPLE.

THEY GET ALL PUMPED UP AND FIRE OFF OR ERUPT WITH LESS THAN APPROPRIATE MOTIVATION, BECOMING THEMSELVES THE INSTIGATORS AND TERRORIZERS. WHEN THEY WAKE UP, THEY ARE EMBARRASSED WHILE VIEWING SOME POOR, INNOCENT KID, OR SOME OLD LADY, BEING BEATEN BY THEM FOR COMMITING "NO" CRIMINAL ACT...THEY JUST "HAD" TO LET OFF THE STEAM AND NOW THEY LOOK LIKE FOOLS.

NO DECENT MAN OR WOMAN WANTS THAT.


I RESPECT ALL LAW EMFORCMENT AUTHORITIES AND THANK THEM FOR BEING THERE, BUT I HAVE "NO" RESPECT FOR BRAINLESS, "DELTA-DUMMY MENTALITY" OR AN "OVER-MILITARIZED" RESPONSE TO MANAGING A SMALL EVENT.



IN A LARGE SUBURBAN PARK, WE WOULD HAVE HAD "TOTAL CONTAINMENT" AND FULL CONTROL, TO TAKE IT WHERE IT SHOULD HAVE GONE. INSTEAD, THEY TOOK IT RIGHT DOWN THE TOILET, ALONG WITH THE REVEALED DISRESPECT AND LACK OF CONCERN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OR WELFARE, OF LOCAL RESIDENTS. A DISDAIN THAT HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN CLEVERLY CONCEALED.

YES........."I TOLD YOU SO" - DAWN NARET'


"PERHAPS, THE "OFFICIAL" PITTSBURGH POLICE, WERE NOT THE ONES, ABUSING AUTHORITY AT THE G-20"



"PERHAPS THE "OFFICIAL" PITTSBURGH POLICE, WERE NOT THE ONES, ABUSING AUTHORITY AT THE G-20.........", BY DAWN NARET', P.O. BOX 2315, PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-2315


OCTOBER 2009






NOTE:

IN ALL FAIRNESS, I FELT A NEED TO INVESTIGATE FURTHER, THE FRIGHTENING REPORTS OF CITIZEN ABUSE, BY PITTSBURGH POLICE, AT THE G-20 DEMONSTRATIONS.

MY FINAL IMPRESSION IS LEANING TOWARD THEIR INNOCENCE.

I AM PROVIDING THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE FOR EVERYONE TO MAKE THEIR OWN JUDGEMENT.

DIRECTLY BELOW THIS NOTE, IS AN ARTICLE I FOUND,THAT WAS WRITTEN BY MR. HUGH SCHLESINGER, FEATURE WRITER WHO WAS ARRESTED AND RELEASED, DURING THE FRENZIED ACTIVITY. HIS ARTICLE IS VERY INFORMATIVE AND I AM SURE IT IS ALL TRUTHFUL.

FOLLOWING THE ARTICLE, THERE ARE MANY SHORT VIDEO CLIPS, FROM YOUTUBE.COM., MANY SENT IN, BY THE STUDENTS WHO WERE ABUSED, WHEN THEY WERE INNOCENT OBSERVERS, WATCHING THE ACTIVITY IN OAKLAND, FROM A SAFE PERCH IN A UNIVERSITY RESIDENT HALL.

THEY FIRST SAW A MASS OF STUDENTS RUNNING TOWARD THEIR END OF THE STREET, SCREAMING OF FRIGHT. THEY THEN SAW A LINE FORMATION, OF POLICE IN RIOT GEAR, MARCHING AFTER THEM. SOON, THERE WERE EXPLOSIONS OF TEAR GAS AND THE OBSERVERS BEGAN COUGHING, AS THE TEAR GAS SEEPED INTO THE STAIRWELL BRIDGE ENTRY, THAT THEY HAD BEEN PERCHED IN, ABOVE THE STREET, LOOKING OUT THE WINDOWS.

THEY RAN DOWN THE STAIRS AND ATTEMPTED TO RUN OUT OF THE BUILDING, BUT WERE STOPPED, BY POLICE, WHO ORDERED THEM BACK INTO THE BUILDING.

WHEN THEY COULD NOT GET AN EAR OF MERCY, THEY WENT BACK IN AND STARTED UP THE STAIRS, WITH POLICE HERDING BEHIND THEM.

HALF-WAY UP THE STAIRS, THEY SAW THE FEET, OF 2 OFFICERS, AT THE TOP OF THE STEPS. THESE OFFICERS BLOCKED THEIR PATH AND WOULD NOT ALLOW THEM TO GO INTO THE RESIDENT HALL, OF THE BUILDING. THIS LEFT THEM TRAPPED IN THE STAIRWELL, HERDED FROM BOTH UP THE STAIRS AND FROM DOWN THE STAIRS. THIS INCIDENT CONCERNS ME GREATLY.

I WAS NOT ABLE TO SEE AN IDENTIFYING NAME ON THE UNIFORMS, IN THIS VIDEO, BUT IN OTHERS, I REALIZED THAT SOME OF THE WORST INCIDENTS, WERE BEING CONDUCTED BY OUT-OF-TOWN ASSISTANTS,TO THE PITTSBURGH POLICE. ONE CLEARLY LABLED "N.Y.P.D." AND ONE LABELED "PA HIGHWAY PATROL".

WHAT ALSO CONCERNS ME GREATLY, ARE 2 VIDEOS SHOWING, WHAT APPEAR TO BE "AN ABDUCTION" DISGUISING ITSELF AS AN ARREST. IT IS BEING CONDUCTED BY 3 MEN IN MILITARY CAMOPHLAGE UNIFORMS. THEY ARE SHOVING A YOUNG MAN INTO AN "UNOFFICIAL" CIVILIAN CAR, AND I FEAR THAT THEY MAY HAVE, NOT EVEN BEEN "OFFICIAL" ASSISTANTS, ON DUTY TO AID THE OFFICIAL POLICE. I FEAR THIS, BECAUSE I FOUND ANOTHER VIDEO, ALSO SHOWING 3 MEN IN CAMOPHLAGE AND THEY MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE BEEN THE SAME MEN. BUT THEIR CLOTHES WERE SWITCHED FROM GREEN TO TAN FATIGUES.

WHO WERE THESE "ABDUCTORS" ?

WHO WERE THEY "ABDUCTING" ?

THEN I FOUND ANOTHER VIDEO THAT IS INTERVIEWING, WHAT I ASSUME WAS AN "OFFICIAL" LOCAL NATIONAL GUARDSMAN, WHO CLEARLY DENIED ANY APPROVAL OR INSTRUCTION, OR GIVEN AUTHORITY TO APPREHEND, ARREST OR ABDUCT PROBLEM ACTIVISTS. HE SEEMED TO UNDERSTAND HIS ORDERS WERE TO BE SIMPLY A PRESENCE, AIDING IF NEC., BUT MORE AN IMAGE OF SECURITY THAN AN ACTIVE ENFORCER.


I THINK IT IS IMPORTANT TO CLARIFY AND VERIFY THESE INSTRUCTIONS, TO GET A FACTUAL COMPREHENSION OF WHETHER OR NOT THE PITTSBURGH POLICE WERE ACTUALLY ABUSIVE TO THEIR OWN CITIZENS AND STUDENTS.

BUT I WOULD LIKE AN EXPLANATION OF WHY THE YOUNG MAN WAS BEING SHOVED INTO A CIVILIAN CAR, BY 3-4 MEN IN CAMOPHLAGE.

WERE THEY "OFFICIAL" AIDES ?
WERE THEY IMPOSTERING THE "OFFICIAL" AIDES ?
WERE THEY OFFICIAL MILITARY ?
WERE THEY IMPOSTERING THE U.S. MILITARY ?

THESE ARE EXTREMELY SERIOUS CONCERNS. IN A "WORST CASE SCENARIO" CONTEMPLATION.......WHICH I ALWAYS CONDUCT, BEFORE GOING BALLISTIC OR BECOMING OVERLY FOCUSED ON SECURITY NEEDS, I DEEMED THIS ONE "WARRENTED ATTENTION AND IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION".

IT WOULD BE A POSSIBILITY, IN A "W.C.S." THEORY, THAT ANTI-U.S. GOVERNMENT INFILTRATORS COULD SEEK TO ROUSE CHAOS AND CITIZEN MISTRUST IN AMERICAN FIGURES OF AUTHORITY.

THEIR "EASIEST MEANS" OF DOING THIS, WOULD BE TO IMPOSTER THE AMERICAN AUTHORITY FIGURES AND ABUSE THE CITIZENS.

THE BEST "OPPOSITION" TO THIS IMPOSTERING, WOULD BE FOR THE AMERICAN AUTHORITY FIGURES TO;

"NUMBER ONE, FIRST AND ALWAYS FOREMOST" :

* DISPLAY AN ABUNDANCE OF RESPECT, COMPASSION AND INTEREST IN HELPING AND PROTECTING CITIZENS

* TRACK THE IMPOSTERS/ABUSERS DOWN

* EXPOSE THEIR IMPOSTERING

* PROSECUTE THEM

ISN'T THAT THE PURPOSE OF THEIR FUNCTION "ALL THE TIME" ANYWAY ? ? ?

BY DAWN NARET'

P.O. BOX 2315, PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-2315

dnaret@gmail.com


NEXT: THE "LIVE VIDEO EVIDENCE" PLEASE CLICK URL LINK TO VIEW - MUSIC HERE, WILL STOP !

YOUTUBE.COM VIDEOS ON PITTSBURGH G-20 SUMMIT PROTESTORS AND ACTIONS

MILITARY ATTACKS PROTESTORS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqU3-MLycLc






CAMOPHLAGE TROOPS BLACK ONE IN TAN – WHITE ONE IN GREEN
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZFvJn04_hs




CAMOPHLAGE ABDUCTION – 1 WHITE/1 BLACK – BLACK ONE NOW, IN GREEN NOT TAN CAMOPHLAGE-WHITE VICTIM-WHITE DRIVER
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-TqMDthnEo






CAMOPHLAGE DENIES ASSIGNMENT/ DUTY AUTHORITY TO TAKE PROTESTERS INTO CUSTODY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zvxk0Tn0v8







OBSERVING STUDENTS TRAPPED ON STAIRCASE – POLICE INVADED STAIRWAY OF RESIDENCE HALL AND BLOCKED THEM AT TOP AND BOTTOM OF STAIRS – THEY WERE ONLY WATCHING FROM ABOVE THE STREET- BATON JAB
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNyV7UQJpyY





IN PITTSBURGH - NYPD POLICE BEAT UP PGH TIBET PROTESTORS AND ARE TAZERING (?) SEVERAL DURING GANG PIN DOWN – VICTIM CANNOT STAND – LAYING AROUND ON STREET AFTERWARDS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbfA5q0QaNI




INTERNATIONAL TV NEWS REPORT LOOKIN VERY BAD FOR PGH
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3CYknz7FCQ




ARRESTS – CAMERAS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_acjSiJRbo






I ALSO HAVE SELECTED SEVERAL VIDEOS OF THE LONDON G-20 SUMMIT, WHERE IT IS CLEAR THAT THE "OFFICIAL" LONDON "BOBBIES" (OFFICIAL POLICE) ARE RESPECTFUL, WITHOUT RIOT GEAR AND TREATING THE CROWD WITH PATIENCE, EVEN SCOLDING ONE DEMONSTRATOR SAYING, "YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELF....".

BUT "THEY" ARE NOT ABUSIVE.

THERE ARE, HOWEVER OTHER VIDEOS THAT SHOW POLICE IN RIOT GEAR AND ARE BEING EXTREMELY VIOLENT AND ABUSIVE.


WERE THEY "HIRED" FOR "TEMPORARY SERVICE" ?
THESE ARTICLES HAVE MET WITH ATTEMPTS TO OBSTRUCT PUBLISHING. I MUST FIND THESE MISSING ADDITIONAL VIDEOS.

I HAVE 1 NOW, AND WILL PUBLISH THE MISSING ONES A.S.A.P. - DAWN NARET'


ENGLAND G-20 SUMMIT – TOMLINSON DEATH – POLICE ABUSE ON MAN WITH HIS HANDS IN HIS POCKETS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HECMVdl-9SQ








******************************************************************

NEXT G-20 ITEM:


SHARED SPECIAL FEATURE

"G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh"
A Reporter documents police brutality at Summit protests

By Hugh Schlesinger
Issue date: 10/15/09 found at:

http://media.www.vanderbiltorbis.com/media/storage/paper983/news/2009/10/15/Newsfeatures/Special.feature.g20.Summit.In.Pittsburgh-3804843.shtml







One moment from my time at late September's G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh has stuck in my mind: the image of about 300 police officers in full riot gear and backed up by armored vehicles sporting various non-lethal weapons, including the sonic cannon, blocking off three of the four streets of an intersection.
These officers were deployed at this location to break up an unpermitted protest march, dubbed the "People's Uprising," on the first day of the summit. The officers' presence was much larger than that of the protesters, and they seemed more confident of and prepared for imminent violence than any of the marchers.

Not surprisingly, violence did occur, as attempts by the police to disperse the protesters, including arrests and the use of tear gas, led to a retreat en masse by the protesters, some confrontations between protesters and police, and sporadic instances of property destruction.

The police's behavior typified the disproportionate force they used throughout the summit. Hours after the People's Uprising, police continued to occupy the area surrounding the march, blocking off entire streets and displacing some from their homes or businesses for hours. During this time they arrested multiple individuals and fired on protesters with rubber bullets and tear gas.

The two arrests I witnessed during this period where particularly shocking. First, I was standing with a group of people on a street corner close to a police line. When the police decided to move forward about fifteen feet, they ordered us off the corner and across two lanes of traffic. The officers immediately apprehended one of the members who didn't move fast enough.
The second arrest involved a protester who had filmed this first arrest. About ten minutes after ordering us to move, two officers charged down the street filled with 50 people and tackled a man to the ground. A person who knew the arrested man reported that he had been bruised and bloodied during the arrest and that his video camera had been smashed. He also said he witnessed a policeman pointing out protesters to his fellow officers and suggested that his apprehended friend had been targeted for video recording the other arrest.

Members of the ACLU were on hand to gather information about detained protesters and to monitor police action during the demonstrations.

That night another rally at Schenley Plaza near the University of Pittsburgh, ironically organized in protest of police brutality and in solidarity with those arrested, was violently dispersed by police and many more people were arrested. While a permitted protest march the next day of nearly 5,000 participants was peaceful, it was accompanied by a police presence of more than 1,000 officers. (Other reporting indicated that about 5,000 officers had been called up for security that weekend.) Then, that evening, the incident repeated itself at Schenley Plaza, with more arrests and another jail solidarity protest violently dispersed by the police.

It must be said that during all of these events, there were participants who planned to commit acts of vandalism and destruction, and they did succeed in causing about $50,000 worth of damage, $20,000 of which was reportedly caused by a single demonstrator. But these violent protesters made up only a fraction of the demonstrators, and they necessitated a proportional police response, not overwhelming force, to stymie their efforts.

Unfortunately, the Pittsburgh Police Department instead treated all protesters as if they were violent. When applied, force and arrests were used indiscriminately, with protesters and non-protesters (including a number of University of Pittsburgh students) being targeted.

These experiences left me with a central question: What was the point of law enforcement's harsh treatment of protesters? It was clear that the amount of security dedicated to the demonstrations was excessive. I also have little doubt that the tactics used against these demonstrators instigated the violence that occurred, making them highly ineffective crowd-control methods. Even if some of the protesters were motivated to disturb the peace, these individuals appeared not to have the means or the organization to cause much damage to the city or to present any threat to the G-20 delegates.

The disproportionate police response had no goal other than to intimidate, and this was the most disturbing aspect of the police's actions. They seemed purposeless, acting only to demonstrate the force and authority they had been granted and to try out the new toys they had obtained. For example, they proudly claimed during the protests that they were the first police force in the United States to publicly use the sonic cannon.

As a nation, we allowed this to happen. As they have done many times before, the public and media stood by with seemingly little notice or concern. Because of the marginal nature of the political ideas represented by these protesters, few cared to stand up in their defense.

Media Credit: Hugh Schlesinger
Police officers arrested several demonstrators during the Pittsburgh summit.
Special feature: G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh
Reporter documents police brutality at Summit protests
Hugh Schlesinger
Issue date: 10/15/09 found at: media.www.vanderbiltorbis.com


One moment from my time at late September's G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh has stuck in my mind: the image of about 300 police officers in full riot gear and backed up by armored vehicles sporting various non-lethal weapons, including the sonic cannon, blocking off three of the four streets of an intersection.
These officers were deployed at this location to break up an unpermitted protest march, dubbed the "People's Uprising," on the first day of the summit. The officers' presence was much larger than that of the protesters, and they seemed more confident of and prepared for imminent violence than any of the marchers.

Not surprisingly, violence did occur, as attempts by the police to disperse the protesters, including arrests and the use of tear gas, led to a retreat en masse by the protesters, some confrontations between protesters and police, and sporadic instances of property destruction.

The police's behavior typified the disproportionate force they used throughout the summit. Hours after the People's Uprising, police continued to occupy the area surrounding the march, blocking off entire streets and displacing some from their homes or businesses for hours. During this time they arrested multiple individuals and fired on protesters with rubber bullets and tear gas.

The two arrests I witnessed during this period where particularly shocking. First, I was standing with a group of people on a street corner close to a police line. When the police decided to move forward about fifteen feet, they ordered us off the corner and across two lanes of traffic. The officers immediately apprehended one of the members who didn't move fast enough.
The second arrest involved a protester who had filmed this first arrest. About ten minutes after ordering us to move, two officers charged down the street filled with 50 people and tackled a man to the ground. A person who knew the arrested man reported that he had been bruised and bloodied during the arrest and that his video camera had been smashed. He also said he witnessed a policeman pointing out protesters to his fellow officers and suggested that his apprehended friend had been targeted for video recording the other arrest.

Members of the ACLU were on hand to gather information about detained protesters and to monitor police action during the demonstrations.

That night another rally at Schenley Plaza near the University of Pittsburgh, ironically organized in protest of police brutality and in solidarity with those arrested, was violently dispersed by police and many more people were arrested. While a permitted protest march the next day of nearly 5,000 participants was peaceful, it was accompanied by a police presence of more than 1,000 officers. (Other reporting indicated that about 5,000 officers had been called up for security that weekend.) Then, that evening, the incident repeated itself at Schenley Plaza, with more arrests and another jail solidarity protest violently dispersed by the police.

It must be said that during all of these events, there were participants who planned to commit acts of vandalism and destruction, and they did succeed in causing about $50,000 worth of damage, $20,000 of which was reportedly caused by a single demonstrator. But these violent protesters made up only a fraction of the demonstrators, and they necessitated a proportional police response, not overwhelming force, to stymie their efforts.

Unfortunately, the Pittsburgh Police Department instead treated all protesters as if they were violent. When applied, force and arrests were used indiscriminately, with protesters and non-protesters (including a number of University of Pittsburgh students) being targeted.

These experiences left me with a central question: What was the point of law enforcement's harsh treatment of protesters? It was clear that the amount of security dedicated to the demonstrations was excessive. I also have little doubt that the tactics used against these demonstrators instigated the violence that occurred, making them highly ineffective crowd-control methods. Even if some of the protesters were motivated to disturb the peace, these individuals appeared not to have the means or the organization to cause much damage to the city or to present any threat to the G-20 delegates.

The disproportionate police response had no goal other than to intimidate, and this was the most disturbing aspect of the police's actions. They seemed purposeless, acting only to demonstrate the force and authority they had been granted and to try out the new toys they had obtained. For example, they proudly claimed during the protests that they were the first police force in the United States to publicly use the sonic cannon.

As a nation, we allowed this to happen. As they have done many times before, the public and media stood by with seemingly little notice or concern. Because of the marginal nature of the political ideas represented by these protesters, few cared to stand up in their defense.

Media Credit: Hugh Schlesinger
Police officers arrested several demonstrators during the Pittsburgh summit.

Media Credit: Hugh Schlesinger
Many people took to the streets in favor of economic and social justice.

Media Credit: Hugh Schlesinger
A line of officers monitored the parade of demonstrators during the second day of protests.





Media Credit: Hugh Schlesinger
Many people took to the streets in favor of economic and social justice.




Media Credit: Hugh Schlesinger
A line of officers monitored the parade of demonstrators during the second day of protests.



END OF G-20 ITEMS

****************************************************

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. LAST SPEECH - CARTER - NEW WORLD ORDER - PRESIDENT OBAMA

MARTIN LUTHER KING JR’S LAST SPEECH





PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER SPEAKS ON “CRISIS OF CONFIDENCE”







“PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER WAS RIGHT…..”




THE NEW WORLD ORDER







PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA “A MORE PERFECT NATION”










UNITED STATES CONGRESS

UNITED STATES CONGRESS
composing the declaration of independance - 1776

PLEA FROM A DESPERATE U.S. CITIZEN

"PLEA FROM A DESPERATE U.S. CITIZEN"

(THE FOLLOWING LETTER WAS ADDRESSED TO A LARGE NUMBER OF MEDIA EMAIL ADDRESSES.......I JUST KEEP GETTING BACK "NOT A SUCCESSFUL SEND" MEMOES.

I ATTEMPTED TO SEND A COMPLIMENT TO EAT'NPARK.COM, FOR AN EMPLOYEE, AND WAS BLOCKED.................I AM IN NEED OF ASSISTANCE WITH THIS MAXIMUM BLOCKAGE TO MY FREEDOM TO COMMUNICATE AND BE REACHED IN PERSON AND NOT AN IMPOSTER.......................THIS IS BEYOND ACCIDENTAL OR HUMOROUS.

IT IS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY....................

IT IS A VIOLATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS..........

IT IS ILLEGAL IMPRISONING OF U.S. CITIZENS................

IT IS OBSTRUCTING HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT.........

IT IS TERRORIZING INNOCENT U.S. CITIZENS, AND THERE MUST BE A PROSECUTION END TO THE PROBLEM OR IT WILL ATTACK EVERYONE.)

FEBRUARY 28, 2009

CAN YOU HELP ME PLEASE?

FOR YEARS, I HAVE BEEN LIVING AS A PRISONER IN MY OWN COUNTRY.

I AM A WHITE FEMALE, 60 YEARS OLD, AMERICAN BORN CITIZEN, WITH NO CRIMINAL RECORD AND NO ASSOCIATIONS WITH CRIMINALS, VOLUNTARILY.

FOR SOME REASON, I FACE A DAILY TORMENT AND FEDERAL INTRUSION ON MY LIFE FOR 24 HOURS A DAY.

ABSOLUTELY ALL OF MY COMMUNICATIONS ARE BLOCKED AND TRESPASSED ON, INCLUDING FEDERAL HARD MAIL, CELL PHONE, BLOG SITES AND COMMENTS TO THOSE BLOG SITES. I RESPONDED ON ONE OF YOUR BUZZ ARTICLES ABOUT ED RENDELL - "TRASH THE COMMIES CLYDE" BRINGS UP MY COPY OF IT ON MY BLOG SITE. GOOGLE .COM HAS MANY OF MY BLOG SITES LISTED WITH ARTICLES, BUT MANY ARE IMITATORS, WITH 2 INITIALS IN FRONT OF THE URL.

I AM A LOYAL AMERICAN, WHO HAS BEEN PUSHED INTO DESTITUTION, PERMANENTLY DAMAGED PHYSICALLY, CONSTANTLY STALKED, TERRORIZED AND BLOCKED FROM NORMAL LIFE FUNCTIONS, PREJUDICED AND BANISHED FROM SOCIAL ASSISTANCE AND NOW, THE LAST STRAW, AS A DESPERATE MEASURE, I SET UP A BLOG SITE NAMED "CONTACT ME" AS A LAST DITCH EFFORT TO HAVE AN AVENUE OF COMMUNICATION.

THIS WAS SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, AND THE INTERNET THIEVES IMMEDIATLY DAMAGED THE TYPE-IN BLOCKS, THAT ARE AVAILABLE ON THE TEMPLATE, SO NO ONE COULD TYPE COMMUNICATION. THIS WAS THE PURPOSE OF THE TEMPLATE CHOICE. THEY TRESPASS DAILY, INTO MY ACCOUNTS, AND STEAL, ERASE CHUNKS OF COMMENTARY, IMPERSONATE ME, BLOCK VIEWING, BLOCK PUBLISHING ETC., ETC., ETC., OF A NEVER-ENDING TERRORIZING, THAT I HAVE BECOME SO USED TO, THAT I DON'T ALWAYS SEND A COMPLAINT TO THE SERVER, BECAUSE I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT THEY HAVE ILLEGALLY STOLEN THE TEMPLATE OF THE SERVER AND IMITATE THEM ALSO. SO, I CAN NEVER KNOW IF THE SERVER EVEN RECIEVED MY COMPLAINT.

WHAT COULD YOU DO ?

I REALIZE THAT YOU ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO DO MUCH, BUT PERHAPS YOU COULD VIEW MY PERFECTLY LOYAL AMERICAN, INTELLIGENT, CONCERNED BLOGS AND FIRST OF ALL, WITNESS THAT I AM NOT A NUT CASE. THEN, I WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WOULD TRY TO COME INTERVIEW ME, IN PITTSBURGH, PA, AND LET ME BEGIN TO GET MY STORY OUT OF THIS REIGN OF TERROR THAT I HAVE BEEN EXISTING IN. IT HAS DETAILS OF POLITICAL CONNECTION WITH ROYAL HOUSES, AND NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL VICTIMIZATION THAT IS NOT A DELUSION. I HAVE PHYSICAL DAMAGE AND EVIDENCE OF TORTURE AND ILLEGAL EXPERIMENTATION.

I FEEL THAT I DO NOT HAVE MUCH LONGER TO LIVE AND THE TRUTH OF THESE HORRIBLE IMPRISONMENTS AND ENSLAVINGS OF U.S. CITIZENS MUST GO PUBLIC A.S.A.P.

THE HORROR HAS INCLUDED CORRUPT EMPLOYEES, IN ALL VENUES OF CAREER OCCUPATION, EVEN EMPLOYEES AT THE LOCAL LIBRARIES, BEING PAID TO CO-OPERATE, BLOCK, MANIPULATE AND PROVIDE FALSE TESTIMONY, IN AN EFFORT TO INSTITUTIONALIZE U.S. VICTIMS, IN EITHER PRISONS, NURSING HOMES OR PSYCHIATRIC FACILITIES, TO GET THEM OUT OF THE WAY FOR IDENTITY THIEVES, WHO TAKE OVER THEIR IDENTY AND TO KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT.

ALL OF MY EMAIL ACCOUNTS ARE TRESPASSED ON AND I RARLY RECIEVE AUTHENTIC MAIL. I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT OTHERS HAVE BEEN USING THE ACCOUNTS, EVEN TO SELL PHARMACUTICALS. MY FEDERAL MAIL AT:

DAWN NARET'
P.O.BOX 2315
PITTSBURGH, PA 15230-2315

HOLDS MUCH OF MY MAIL BACK FROM ME FOR 3-4 MONTHS. THEN I ONLY GET A PORTION OF ALL THAT WAS THERE. BUT WHAT I GET WAS ALL PUT IN AT THE SAME TIME AND IT IS THAT ILD, AND I WAS THERE SEVERAL TIMES, IN THE MEANTIME AND IT WAS NOT THERE. SO IT IS GIVEN TO SOMEONE ELSE, BEFORE I RECIEVE IT AND THERE IS MUCH I NEVER RECIEVE AT ALL.

I HAVE 14 BLOG SITES, ALL HONORABLE, LINKABLE FROM:

http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/
http://www.authordawnnaret.blogspot.com/
http://www.dawnnaretnews.wordpress.com/
http://www.subatomicquantumhumor.blogspot.com/

I LIVE ON THE STREET, IN SQUIRREL HILL, PITTSBURGH, PA AND GO TO THE SQUIRREL HILL LIBRARY, EVERYDAY. I AM RECOGNISED THERE, BY SECURITY AND STAFF WHO HAVE PASSED ON MESSAGES TO ME FROM CONCERNED NEIGHBORS. I MUST SIT, ON A CHAIR AND CARRY A PORTABLE CHAIR WITH ME AS I PULL 2 ROLLING TOTE BAGS.

MY PHOTO IS DISPLAYED ON ALL MY BLOG SITES AND MY HAIR IS WELL BELOW THE WAIST AND MED BROWN/GRAYING.
I AM HEAVY-SET, INTELLIGENT, HONORABLE AND ANXIOUS TO ACCEPT HELP FROM ANYONE WHO WILL APPROACH ME IN PERSON AN PROVE TO THEMSELVES, THAT I AM THE AUTHENTIC LADY WHO WROTE ALL THESE BLOGS. I AM AMERICAN-MUSLIM AND SPEAK ARABIC PRAYER, AS AN EXTRA TEXT.

THANK YOU, DAWN NARET'

Monday, July 02, 2007

EXIBIT #1 HOW PA STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CAUSED ME TO BECOME AND REMAIN HOMELESS




*************************************************************************************
EXIBIT #1

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
NARET v. UCBR NO. 1742 CD 2004 (2004)

BY DAWN NARET', ATTORNEY FOR THE APPELLANT

PROCEDURAL HISTORY:This is an appeal of the final determination of the Unemployment compensation Board Of Review, (hereafter referred to as UCBR), which ruled, on July 17, 2004, that claimant was not entitled to Unemployment Compensation Benefits, (hereafter referred to as UC Benefits).

On February 7, 2004, the Unemployment Compensation Department ruled that the claimant was eligible for unemployment compensation benefits under section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law

On March 12, 2004, a service-contract company from missouri named TALX filed an appeal to that determination claiming itself non-legal agent of the employer. A hearing was held April 21, 2004 before referee, Marilyn Gunden. A local employee of the employee was present to represent the employer.

The claimant was late to arrive and was denied during two (2) phone requests to allow her a few more minutes to attend the hearing or to deliver a written testimony to be evaluated before a final decision.

The referee held a 15 minute hearing with the employers representative while the claimant was on the phone but was denied the opportunity to testify. The referee decided on May 17, 2004 in favor of the employer and ruled that the claimant was not eligible for unemployment compensation benefits under section 402(e).


On June 1, 2004 Claimant appealed the decision of the referee with the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (hereafter referred to as UCBR) and forwarded written testimony to the UCBR as instructed by the referee's office.

On July 21, 2004 the UCBR ruled in favor of the referee and denied the claimant's request to have the decision remanded. The presiding board members were: William A Hawkins, Chairman Eileen B. Melvin, MemberRichard W. Bloomingdale, and MemberClaimant sent the UCBR a request for reconsideration and was denied a reconsideration.Claimant is now appealing to the honorable judges of the Commonwealth Court of Pa. A brief was hand-delivered by claimant on October 8, 2004 and was rejected by an unnamed person.


FACTUAL HISTORY:

On February 21, 2004 The Unemployment Compensation Department "Notice of Determination", listed a fact finding survey of the employer.the employer denied willful misconduct in the findings of fact:

1. The claimant was last employed on February 5, 2004
2. The claimant's job title was LPN Charge Nurse.
3. The claimant was discharged as a result of "unsatisfactory work performance".
4. The claimant had been warned about the unsatisfactory work performance.
5. The claimant worked to the best of her ability.

Based on the employers testimony in the fact finding survey, the Unemployment Compensation Department rendered a decision of eligible for UC Benefits pursuant to section 402 (e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.On March 12, 2004 A service-contract company named TALX, from missouri, filed an appeal to eligibility, claiming itself representative and non-legal agent of the employer. Their appeal was charging willful misconduct that was already denied by the local employer. an appeal hearing should not have been granted


On April 21, 2004 A hearing was held at 10:30AM before referee, Marilyn Gunden. The representative for the employer, Ms. Donna Bowman, Director of nursing, arrived and was invited to inspect the file. She looked at the already existing file containing documents #1 through #31.

The referee stated that she would now enter items #1 through #31, (that were not presented by Ms. Bowman), into the record if THERE was no objection, and Ms. Bowman was sworn in for testimony. The claimant was late for the hearing. She phoned in to request a short recess of a few minutes untill she could arrive. The request was denied. She was told that the hearing had already started and she was too late to attend.

She phoned back a second time to request permission to drop off a written testimony, including evidence to be evaluated before a final decision by the referee. The request was denied. She was told that she would have an opportunity to present testimony to the UCBR, in an appeal process available to her if the referee decided in favor of the employer.

The hearing lasted 15 minutes and the claimant was on the phone twice, during that time, trying to attend or at least drop off written testimony.


On May 17, 2004 the referee made a determination in favor of the employer and reversed the original determination of eligible to not eligible.

On June 1, 2004 claimant filed an appeal to the UCBR, and mailed to them a 15 page initial cover letter plus 50 pages of example correspondence she had had with her superiors, aiding them in having full knowledge of problem areas and reporting her efforts to inspire state and corporate compliance and efficient functioning in the facility.
She requested a timely review, by the UCBR, because UC Benefits were immediately cut off upon the referee's decision of not eligible.

On July 6, 2004 A letter of inquiry was sent to Mr. Bill Truskey, Legislative Liaison for UCBR from the honorable Mike Sturla, PA State Representative to attempt to aid the claimant, his constituent, in ending the financial duress being suffered while awaiting remanding by the UCBR upon examination of all the testimony and evidence presented.

On July 21, 2004, three (3) months after the referee's hearing, the UCBR supported the referee's decision and denied eligibility of UC Benefits based on; "the entire record of the prior proceedings, including the testimony submitted at the referee's hearing".

There was no due process available to the claimant. Her testimony and evidence were not even evaluated in the appeal. There was no appeal process.

Her testimony was rejected from being accepted into the record. The discarding of the testimony of the claimant was stated to have been done because; "The claimant has not established good cause for her actions. The claimant's request that the record be remanded for additional testimony (the claimant's ONLY testimony) is denied as she has not advanced proper cause for her failure to appear at the original referee's hearing.".

Page one (1) and page two (2) of the 15 page initial letter filing appeal to the UCBR gave a clear explanation that the claimant was indeed attempting to attend but was forbidden to attend and also forbidden to deliver written testimony.

On July 28, 2004 claimant submitted a request for forms to enter an appeal with the Commonwealth Court of PA., in the event that a reconsideration would also be denied by the UCBR.

On July 29,2004, following a telephone request, a written request for all transcripts and records of the hearing was e-mailed to the UCBR.

On July 29, 2004 a five (5) page brief request for reconsideration, citing the list of items being appealed, was faxed to the UCBR.

On July 29, 2004 Claimant also post-marked and mailed a 34 page hard-copy letter to the UCBR, making a formal request for reconsideration and listing specific arguments to the final decision. The specific arguments from this letter were used in the original brief presented October 8, 2004, on pages two (2) through thirty-three (33) of the "brief of petitioner" portion listed in the table of contents. (That original brief was rejected and this one is a re-submission of brief.)

On July 29, 2004, The same day the e-mail and faxed requests were received by the UCBR, the staff of the UCBR prepared a packet of several form letters, acknowledging receipt of communications, but did not include any copies of the record of the hearing.

On August 4, 2004, five (5) days later, UCBR denied the request for reconsideration leaving the denial decision standing as final.

On August 5, 2004 claimant filed official forms, requesting an appeal to the decision of the UCBR, in the Commonwealth Court of Pa., prior to the 30 day deadline of August 30, 2004, and following the denial for reconsideration.

On September 2, 2004 a motion was filed and approved requesting permission to submit fewer number of briefs to the Commonwealth Court of Pa. claimant had still not received copies of hearing records that were imperative to the preparation of the court brief.

There was also a discrepancy existing with the name of legal council for the UCBR, listed on the order to submit a brief by October 12, 2004. Council listed was Clifford Blaze, Esquire, c/o UCBR, respondent. Unable to locate a phone # for attorney Blaze.

On October 8, 2004 Claimant traveled to Harrisburg, Pa and hand delivered five (5) copies of brief to the Commonwealth Court of Pa. prior to the October 12, 2004 deadline.

Also, one (1) copy of brief and certificate of service were delivered and accepted by ms. Denise Roddy, Supervisor of UCBR, 10 th floor Labor and Industry Bldg., Harrisburg, Pa. Ms. Roddy signed the receipt of acceptance and explained that Clifford Blaze, Esquire had left his assignment as legal council for the UCBR in August 2004 and she was currently handling appeals for the UCBR. Claimant had still received no response to two (2) requests for copies of hearing records, but was forced to submit a brief before the deadline.

On October 13, 2004 five (5) days later, claimant received an order of rejection of brief with a full list of required form, but no listing of any specific inconsistency to acceptable form. There was also no copy of brief returned with the order.

This created great unfair demand to create and submit a new brief because no indication was given as to why the original had been rejected. The new deadline for submission was November 12, 2004.

On October 25, 2004 claimant e-mailed a third (3rd) request to the UCBR to please expidite the July 29th telephone and e-mail request for copies of the hearing records.

On October 26, 2004 that e-mail was responded to and a transcript of the taped testimony of the employers representative was forwarded to the claimant by Gerard M. Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Council for UCBR. However, on page two (2) of the transcript a reference was made to documents #1 through #31 being placed into the file before the employers representative arrived at the referee's office. The representative was given an opportunity to look at them and then they were entered into the record and the representative was sworn in to begin testimony.

On October 25, 2004 claimant mailed a hard copy letter to the Commonwealth Court requesting, "to re-open records of this proceeding for the reception of further evidence." and also requesting a verification that all major testimony and correspondence, from claimant to the UCBR, were available in the file presented to the Commonwealth Court of Pa.

"My main concerns are that you have copies of: 15 page initial letter to UCBR requesting an appeal, a 50 page packet of sample communications to my superiors and a 34 page letter requesting a reconsideration of the UCBR denial of my request for an appeal. and an authentic copy of corporate termination rules to be included.". (none was presented to the referee, termination policy and "just cause" requirements were accepted on hearsayof the representative).

On October 26, 2004 a response to that letter was prepared and mailed to claimant by Mr. C.R. Hostutler, Deputy Prothonotary/Chief Clerk. Verification was given of the presence of a 15 page initial letter, a 50-page packet of sample correspondence to superiors and the five page brief request for reconsideration that was faxed on July 29, 2004.

It was discovered that the hard copy full request for reconsideration, with itemized points of dispute, that was post-marked the same day, was not included in the file. There was no mention of records and transcripts of the hearing that were available.

"If you believe the record is incomplete, you may file a motion to modify the record with this court." The motion to modify the record was the letter he was responding to. The request to re-open the records for reception of further evidence was already submitted.

On November 3, 2004 claimant e-mailed a forth (4th) request for full release of all records of hearing, specifically documents #1 through #31 that were entered into the record on page two (2) of the transcript, but not identified or quoted from during the hearing and not presented by the employers representative during testimony. (Claimant is now facing a deadline of November 12, 2004 for re-submission of brief.)

On November 8, 2004 The 4th request to the UCBR for the remaining records of the hearing, specifically documents labeled #1 (one) through #31 (thirty-one) have not been forwarded for inspection or consideration in the preparation of the replacement brief demanded by C.R. Hostutler, Deputy Prothonotary/Chief Clerk.

Claimant is therefore requesting an immediate remand or reversal with prejudice on this case due to lack of timely release of records that are imperative to the preparation of the brief.

We are now four (4) days from the deadline of November 12, 2004 slated for submission. It is inconsistent with PA Code 101.54 which requires timely release of "INFORMATION FROM THE FILE" that are necessary for the preparation of a brief.

Updated 2-25-07 by Dawn Naret' to merge the original file “Statement of the Case” with later update and continuation of the chronological activity.

Current Contact Info:Dawn Naret', P.O. Box 2315, Pittsburgh, Pa., 15230-2315

STATEMENT OF THE CASE2-26-05 UPDATE OF CHRONOLOGICAL ACTIVITY
BY DAWN NARET',
ATTORNEY PRO SEDOCKET NO. 1742 CD 2004

NOVEMBER 10 Post-mailed Official Motion by Appellant to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice to Commonwealth Court. Included a duplicate copy of the 34 page letter, requesting re-consideration, that was not appended to the record by UCBR, as verified by Mr Hostutler, Chief Prothonotary. E-mailed copy and Certificate of Service to Gerard Mackarevich .

NOVEMBER 11, 2004 Phone call from Mr. Don Wagner, Prothonotary clerk, requesting Copy of Certificate of Service for Motion to be forwarded. Acknowledged receipt of Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice.Provided Fax # 717-787-9559. "no hard-copy follow up required"

NOVEMBER 11, 2004 Phoned P. Michael Sturla, Pa State Representative to request permission to have faxing done by his staff. He agreed to leave written permission for assistance to be given Monday – I declined immediate need.

NOVEMBER 12, 2004 Discovered that E-Mail to Deputy Mackarevich was returned by the UC Dept. staff with a note that this should be sent to Commonwealth Court (??).Faxed copies instead to number listed on Deputy Mackarevich's stationery 717-783-5027. – "Successful Transmission" – From F&M College Campus.

NOVEMBER 12, 2004 Also faxed copy of Certificate of Service to Mr. Wagner, per his request, at number provided, "Successful Send" – From F&M College Campus.

November 14, 2004 Prepared Addendum to Motion of the Appellant to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice and faxed to both Commonwealth Court at the number provided by Mr. Wagner, Prothonotary Ofc. And to Deputy Mackarevich at his ofc. Fax number. Included a cover letter with a 5 th request for the remaining records, specifically items #1 to #31. Transmission Incompleted at F&M College Campus. Resent both from Office of P. Michael Sturla, Pa State Representative. –"Successful Send" left copy in his office file.

NOVEMBER 26, Received copy and Certificate of Service for 11/24/04 Motion by UCBR to Dismiss Petitioner"s Appeal, submitted by UCBR Counsel, Janet M. Tarczy, Assistant counsel for UCBR. Motion, in its text, acknowledges receipt of; 10/25/04 request for records that was E-Mailed to the same address; as the later Motion by the Appellant to Remand, that the staff refused to accept for Deputy Mackarevich. Therefore, this was a correct number and the delivery should not have been refused.

The text in the Motion by the UCBR to Dismiss, also acknowledges receipt of my 11/8/04 Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice, plus Addendum, plus cover letter making the 5 th request for missing records.

NOVEMBER 29, 2004 Prepared Opposition to the Motion by Janet M. Tarczy to Dismiss the Petitioner's Appeal.

NOVEMBER 30, 2004 Faxed copies of Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss to both Counselors Mackarevich and Tarczy at UCBR and to Commonwealth Court, using same correct fax numbers. – "Successful Transmission" from the office of P. Michael Sturla, Pa State Representative. Left a copy of this plus 5 other letters of communication, pertaining to this case, in his hard copy file.

Transmitted E-Mail msg. and attachment of Opposition to Motion to Dismiss document to his Legal Liaison, Pat Coller to make available in his system file.

DECEMBER 6, 2004 Received notice from Prothonotary's office that this case will be dismissed, per request of UCBR, due to lack of reponses or evident interest from appellant, IF a brief is not submitted by Dec. 15, 2004.

* Prothonotary Clerk is still refusing to submit the motion to remand or reverse with prejudice TO THE JUDGE, as is required to be done, immediately upon receipt. The prothonotary clerk is ALSO still demanding submission of a brief which was deemed a canceled dead-line requirement, upon the submission of the motion to remand or reverse with prejudice.

BRIEF WAS NOT SUBMITTED – BECAUSE LEGAL PA PROTOCOL CANCELED IT AS A REQUIRED SUBMISSION, PENDING INVESTIGATION, BY THE JUDGE, INTO COMPLAINTS OF LACK OF COOPERATION FROM UCBR.

THE UCBR HAD 20 DAYS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES TO THE COMPLAINT AND NEVER OFFERED A DEFENCE. THEY INSTEAD FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS THE APPELLENT'S CASE. A CLEAR REJECTION OF PROPER PROTOCOL AND FINAL EVIDENCE THAT VERIFIED AND VALIDATED THE APPELLANTS CHARGE OF NO COOPERATION.

CASE WAS DISMISSED AND CLOSED 12-15-04 BY DECISION OF THE ATTORNEY FOR THE UCBR COMMANDING AND CONTROLLING THE PROTHONOTARY CLERK.

(The official Judge never heard of it or saw the evidence – the PA Judicial System was to corrupt to follow the proper procedural process).

(JUNE 27, 2007 “ STATEMENT ” OF EVENTS UPDATED, BY DAWN NARET’, FOR WEB PUBLISHING)

ON DEC. 13, 2005, APPELLANT WAS EVICTED FROM APARTMENT FOR NON-PAYMENT OF RENT. HAVING NO WHERE TO GO, NO MONEY AND NO VEHICLE, SET OUT ON FOOT. WITH A PULL TOTE. ALL PERSONAL BELONGINGS WERE LOST, INCLUDING FAMILY PHOTOS, HISTORY, ANTIQUES AND PIECES OF ORIGINAL ART, COLLECTOR PRINTS AND LITHOGRAPHS
.
APPELLANT WAS FORCED TO SEEK SHELTER IN THE LOCAL TOWN HOMELESS SHELTER.
OVER-EXPOSURE TO INSECTICIDE AND A DEPLORABLE ENVIRONMENT, NOW FOLLOWED THE RECENT ON-SET OF DETERIORATING HEALTH THAT WAS INITIATED WHILE EMPLOYED AT THE LAST JOB POSITION.

THERE WERE CONSTANT ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINANTS CAUSING AN ABNORMAL INCREASE IN THE OCCURRENCE OF RESPIRATORY AND INFECTIOUS ILLNESSES AMONG STAFF AND RESIDENTS.
APPELLANT WAS HOSPITALIZED AND DIAGNOSED WITH C.O.P.D., CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE AND PERMANENT LUNG DAMAGE.

APPLICATION FOR SOCIAL SECURITY MEDICAL DISABILITY WAS FILED AND APPROVED AND APPEALANT COULD NEVER WORK AGAIN.
THE CASH BENEFIT FROM SOCIAL SECURITY WAS ONLY $940. PER MONTH WITH NO MEDICARE COVERAGE PERMITTED FOR 2 YEARS.

THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA DEMANDED A GARNISHMENT, FOR A DELINQUENT STUDENT LOAN, TO BE SEIZED EVERY MONTH OUT OF THE BENEFIT CHECK, REDUCING INCOME TO $750 PER MONTH AND CANCELLED STATE MEDICAL COVERAGE THE SAME DAY THAT FEDERAL DISABILITY WAS APPROVED.

STATE AND FEDERAL SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES CONTINUE TO ACT WITH OBSTRUCTION AND PREJUDICE, IE: SECTION 8 LOW-INCOME HOUSING APPLICATION WAS REJECTED THREE TIMES FOR LANDLORD EVICTION OR BAD CREDIT REPORT. ALSO ACTION HOUSING AGENCY REJECTED APPLICATION FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING, DUE TO BAD CREDIT REPORT. THESE ATROSITIES OF PRDJUDICE AGAINST HOMELESS PEOPLE IN FINANCIAL CRISIS ARE PREVENTING THE POSSIBILITY OF OBTAINING HOUSING. THE MEGER INCOME WOULD NOT AFFORD RENT, UTILITIES AND FOOD.

JUNE 27, 2007 - MARCH 27, 2009 -

APPEALANT IS STILL HOMELESS AND RECEIVING APPROX. $750 PER MONTH SOCIAL SECURITY INCOME, WHICH DOES NOT LAST 30 DAYS, WHILE FORCED TO OBTAIN MEALS IN RESTURANTS. USUALLY, THE LAST 2 WEEKS OF THE MONTH ARE SPENT EATING CRACKERS OR CHIPS.

NIGHTS ARE SPENT SITTING UP ON A BENCH WAITING UNTIL THE BUSSES START RUNNING SO YOU CAN GET TO A BATHROOM.

SLEEP OCCURS IN SHORT DOZING PERIODS, WHENEVER YOU CAN GET AWAY WITH IT, WITHOUT SOMEONE TAPPING YOU ON THE SHOULDER AND TELLING YOU THAT YOU CAN’T SLEEP HERE. …………….SOME CITIZENS ARE LESS THAN HUMAN.

Current Contact info:
Dawn Naret'
P.O. Box 2315,Pittsburgh, Pa., 15230-2315
EMAIL: (CONTINUED NEXT PAGE)

DAWN NARET’
EMAIL:
dnaret@gmail.com

EXIBIT #2 MOTION TO REMAND OR REVERSE WITH PREJUDICE


gynecomastia



**CONTACT DAWN NARET' AND LINK TO OTHER WEB SITES:**

MAIL: P.O. BOX 23125 PITTSBURGH,PENNSYLVANIA
USA 15230-2315

EMAIL:Reply2dn@gmail.com
dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk

WEB SITES:
http://www.subatomicquantumhumor.com "SUB ATOMIC QUANTUM HUMOR"
http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/ “WE THE PEOPLE”
http://www.chagrinning.blogspot.com/ “CHAGRINNING”
http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com/ “BUDDY, CAN YOU SPARE A LATTE ?”
http://www.dawnnaret.blog.com/ “58 YEAR OLD NATURAL-BORN LADY”


MOTION TO REMAND or REVERSE WITH PREJUDICE
NARET' v. UCBR (2004) NO. 1742 CD 2004



Dawn Naret', Attorney for the Appellant
P.O. Box 643
Lancaster, Pa. 17608


Commonwealth Court of Pa
Irvis Office Bldg. - Room 624
Harrisburg, Pa. 17120

November 8, 2004

I am submitting, today, an official motion to immediately remand or
reverse with prejudice, the case referenced above.

I have made four (4) requests for full records of the hearing held
April 21, 2004 and did finally have the kind intervention of Gerard
M. Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Council of UCBR, who recently moved to
assist with the incompleted cases of Clifford Blaze, Esquire, who left
in August, 2004.

Deputy Markarevich forwarded the transcript of the taped testimony on
my 3rd request of October 25, 2004 to the UCBR for all records. The
deadline for my brief had been October 12, 2004. I submitted brief, in
person, on October 8, 2004 and it was rejected by an Unnamed Person
who did not return them, but sent me a form instruction list of
required brief form and gave me a new deadline of November 12, 2004.

That is only four (4) days away and it is clear that these records
have not been forwarded within reasonable time as required by
Pennsylvania Code 101.54 stating; "When an interested party or his
representative requests information from the file of the Board in
order to present and maintain the issues at a hearing before a referee
or the Board, or in an appeal to the Court, such information
(including the hearing transcript, where the record was transcribed)
shall be made available at a reasonable time to the party and his
representative, without charge."




Upon examination of these transcripts, it was discovered that before
the employers witness arrived, there was were thirty-one (31)
documents already present in the file. The witness was given an
opportunity to view them, upon arrival, and did not object to their
inclusion in the file. But the items were Never mentioned in the
hearing, never identified and never quoted from.

I Immediately made a 4th request to the UCBR, repeating that I needed
ALL RECORDS OF THE HEARING and I have had no response.

It should be clarified to this honorable Court, that on page one (1)
of the transcript, the referee is verifying names and addresses:

"The employer of record is Beverly Health Care in care of TALX UC
Express, P. O. Box 283, St. Louis Missouri, 63166. Is that the address
you'd like to use?". Five (5) sentences later, is a partial response
sentence stating; " This is just a corporate…" (unfinished statement).

The truth is that TALX is not the employer or even affiliated with the
employer except as a service-contractor, hired to appeal EVERY
Unemployment Compensation Claim filed, in order to reduce the
obligatory payments, of the employer, to the State Treasury
Department, for the use in UC Benefit payments. It was TALX who filed
this appeal after the employer already denied a situation of willful
misconduct on the initial fact-finding.

TALX is therefore not the employer or even a viable interested party
because they are not attorneys qualifying as representatives,
acceptable to present evidence or give testimony without being
Judicially objected to as hearsay.

May I cite: Phila. Elec. Co. v. UCBR, 129 Pa Cmwlth 417, 565 A2d 1246 (1989):
"It is hearsay for a Licensed Physicians Assistant to read a test
report into evidence where the assistant is not the person who
conducted the test.", ( The Physician Assistant's reading of a lab
report on test samples is not the testimony of an expert witness on
the stand using his/her expertise, rather, "it is the testimony of a
witness who merely reiterates and parrots the conclusions of
another.") ld.@ 1248.

Also, according to; Perminter v. UCBR 426 A2d 245:
" Hearsay evidence, although properly objected to, may be used as a
basis for further questioning by the referee. The testimony elicited
through the hearsay itself must NOT be given substantive evidentiary
value." ( It is then of itself, inadmissible as evidence and should be
struck from the record).

These documents, labeled #1 (one) through # 31 (thirty-one), which I
still have not received, were not presented by the employer, who
attended the hearing and brought only one exhibit labeled employer's
exhibit # 1 (one). They also were never mentioned in the hearing,
never identified and never quoted from.





Therefore, as they have been held from inspection, necessary for the
proper presentation of this appeal, I make a motion that these
documents labeled #1 (one) through #31 (thirty-one) be viewed as
hearsay evidence and in suspect of authenticity or relevance to this
specific claimant and be struck from the record as inadmissible or
hearsay evidence that could adversely affect the fact-finding and
evaluation of this case.

On the initial fact-finding, conducted by the Department of
Unemployment Compensation, the employer denied that the claimant was
terminated for "willful misconduct", and listed "poor work
performance" as their motivating factor and also stated that "she did
the best she could". This was NOT a charge of "willful misconduct".

During the hearing, the transcripts reveal that the employer, although
still not admitting that the claimant was unfairly accused of
incidents that she insisted she was not a party to, still heard the
referee remind her, (according to page two (2) of the transcript),
that she held the BURDEN OF PROOF to present evidence that "willful
misconduct" had occurred. She STILL DENIED IT UNDER OATH and testified
that the claimant was terminated for "poor work performance".

On the last line of page five (5) she is asked if the incident,
(which the claimant denied being part of), was considered a serious
"Category I" incident, (the company classifies either a Category I or
a Category II on complaints) and the EW (employers witness) stated:
"Actually, no it was Category II."

On page six (6), an explanation of the Categories is requested by the referee:

EMPLOYER: (straight testimony without interruption):

"Actually Category…if we… Category II is the LESS serious of the
Categories. Category I is the more serious and corporate actually
changed that somewhat within the past year. If in other words if we
give a Category I they expect us to immediately suspend somebody. So
we now for the most part use Category II's unless it's something
extremely, extremely serious. We tend to use the Category II because
it fits right in with POOR WORK QUALITY. It's a 2 point…2.2, It's POOR
WORK QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY and that's…"

The employer is then asked what the policy is then for Category II
(less serious) policy and she explains:





EMPLOYER:

"Right…right oh…and she was….actually I'm sorry I should've
said…mentioned that…after 4 warnings the counceling's don't count.
After 4 warnings it's suspension pending investigation for
termination. And that was her 4th".



Therefore, although the employer appears to have satisfied the four
warnings requirement for suspension, she never testified whether there
was an investigation conducted as was ALSO required, according to her
testimony. There were several discrepancies in the testimony of the
employer that are not consistent with issues that occurred or that
qualify
within the judicial definition of "willful misconduct". The employer
stated and again repeated that the claimant was charged with Category
II , LESS serious complaints and a 2 point complaint is POOR WORK
QUALITY.

WILLFUL MISCONDUCT WAS NEVER PROVEN BY THE EMPLOYER. The employer also
failed to present an official copy of the current company policy of
required procedure for termination. The reasons and the procedure
testified to, were not acceptable reasons for termination, according
to actual company policy. The referee accepted hearsay testimony of
questionable documents #1 (one) through #31 (thirty-one) AND hearsay
testimony of what the disciplinary policy was and was blindly misled
to believe that the claimant was terminated with "just cause".

The term "just cause" may vary in as many specific interpretations as
there are different employers who determine their own policies and
procedures. That is why the UCBR is forbidden to deny benefits
according to proven "just cause", but must have proof of "willful
misconduct", fully demonstrated as Judicially Defined in Section 402
(e):

(1) the wanton and willful disregard of the employer's interests, or
(2) the deliberate violation of rules; or
(3) the disregard of standards of behavior which an employer can
rightfully expect from his employee; or
(4) negligence which manifests as culpability, wrongful INTENT, EVIL
DESIGN OR INTENTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIAL disregard for the employer's
interests or the employee's duties and obligations.

These are extremely serious, intentional/deliberate/willful actions
that MUST occur before a label of "willful misconduct" can be applied.
Negligence of clocking back in after lunch may be a company's policy
for "just cause" termination, if committed repeatedly, but it is not a
negligence of the magnitude of the judicial definition of "willful
misconduct" required to deny benefits and none were even intimated by
the employer and definitely none were proven because none occurred.

My third reason for submitting a motion to remand and reverse with
prejudice, is that the UCBR failed to amend a 34-page letter of
request for reconsideration to the record of the case. On July 29,
2004 I responded to the letter of denial on appeal from the UCBR
decision of July 21, 2004. I sent on that day; an e-mail requesting
copies of all records, I faxed a five (5) page brief letter of timely
appeal for reconsideration and I post-marked a hard copy letter of
detailed point by point dispute to the procedure opinions and findings
as stated in the denial letter.



I am forwarding a duplicate copy with this communication. I already
submitted a petition to open the record for admission of additional
evidence on October 25, 2004, which was the letter responded to by
C.R. Hostutler on October 26, 2004. The purpose of that request was
the extended wait for copies of the record that I anticipated might
need additional rebuttal opportunity. This copy of the 34 page letter
is not new evidence but was part of the record of the request for
reconsideration WHERE THE REQUEST WAS DENIED AND NOT APPENDED TO THE
RECORD FOR EVALUATION UPON APPEAL TO THE COMMONWEALTH COURT.

This is yet another violation of Pennsylvania Code:

"Where written application for reopening of a hearing was made to the
board and there is no evidence that the referee or the board appended
to the record the request, ANY supporting material, and the ruling on
the request, A DISMISSAL OF THE CLAIMANTS APPEAL WILL BE REVERSED AND
THE RECORD REMANDED FOR A DETERMINATION OF PROPER CAUSE FOR CLAIMANTS
FAILURE TO ATTEND THE REFEREE'S HEARING."
-ORTIZ V. UCBR 85 PA CMWLTH, 327, 331, 481 A2D 1385

"Finally, a "proper cause" inquiry for non-appearance does NOT
impermissibly reallocate the burden of proof in a "willful misconduct"
setting.".
-FLORES V. UCBR 686 A 2D 66 (PA CMWLTH 1996)

With this over-whelming amount of error clearly proven in the
transcripts and records, I can only trust that this honorable Court
will end the injustice that has so extremely burdened and financially
destroyed this claimant since the initial unfair dismissal from her
job. Evidence proves that she was an excellent example of a
self-starter who gave extra effort in every area to assist her
employer with compliance to all laws, policies and organizational
efforts.

This attempt, by the employer to be released from payment of UC
Benefits stands as a despicable example of dishonest manipulation of
the Law and of the calendars of all the departments who have given
focus to this case. The employer's witness could not bring herself to
state "willful misconduct" because she knew it never existed in this
claimant's performance. And she admitted it twice in clarity.


The claimant, meanwhile:

(1) has a ruined reputation of job performance,
(2) was unexpectedly cut off from her only source of income when the
referee made the error of reversing her initial correct determination
of ELIGIBLE to denied benefits,
(3) she has suffered through five (5) whole months of absolutely no income,
(4) has been penniless without even 50 cents to buy a newspaper or
take a bus for any job searching or attending,
(5) her monthly accounts have not been able to receive any payments
and have now been reported to the Credit Bureau
(6) the Credit Bureau will now be giving an unfavorable report on her
FOR 7 YEARS
(7) she will have difficulty obtaining a new position from an unfair
record of her work
(8) she will have difficulty passing a credit check for a new position
(9) she will have difficulty passing a credit check for a new residence
(10) she has received notice of utilities to be turned off for non-payment
(11) she has received notice of eviction proceedings initiated already
by her landlord
(12) her bank has closed both her checking and savings accounts for
having a zero balance for too long
(13) she was seeking food at food banks to survive
(14) has suffered immense stress and will continue to be adversely
affected by this horrible miscarriage of justice for many years
(15) she has no family or friends to move in with and will become homeless
(16) she will have no address to receive mail of notice of hearing or
reinstatement or receive benefit checks necessary to survive
starvation and death
(17) if you have no residence address, you are not eligible for food
stamps or food bank donation pick-ups.


The state cuts you off and leaves you to starvation.
This is a shocking reality that must come to light for the protection
of citizens in this country. These aggressive moves to cut citizens
off from income is resulting in unbelievable numbers of increased
homelessness.










The UCBR admits to denying 100 to 200 cases per day just in one
office. To extend the multiplication, that is 24,000 to 48,000
citizen families per year placed in this position of possible
homelessness and total destruction to the magnitude that this claimant
is living as the very current reality of facing death within weeks
from now in spite of being totally healthy, with no acute, chronic or
fatal illness. What is Pennsylvania State doing to it's citizens? Why
are they denying with prejudice, benefits for people who have worked
all their lives? Now, to find out that if you no longer have an
address, you are ineligible for any aid declared to be available to
the needy. Who is more needy than a person who has no home?

This case never should have reached this point or been extended to
this amount of time or have to have traveled to this level of the
judicial system before someone would stop the violations of Civil
Rights, of Due Process, of UC Law and of Pa Codes and Statutes.

We have a very well designed litigation system, when it is followed
according to the original rules and intentions. The system was a
non-prejudice system that protected employees from being unfairly
dismissed or denied benefits during the transitional period. Of recent
years it has been digressing toward a system of prejudice for the
employer and denial of Due Process for the claimants.

The major problem seems to be the cutting off of UC Benefits before an
appeal has been decided. Helpful to this may first be to revise the
initial appeal rules to reject appeals being filed by these contract
companies that receive commission on every case they book into appeal
of eligibility. They are creating havoc on the calendar and causing
delays of reinstatement that never should have been lost and have
created financial crisis while they were cut-off. They also are not
able to present evidence or testimony as I have shown you in the Pa
Codes. Their involvement in these cases is inadmissible and removal of
them would greatly reduce the number of unjustified applications for
appeal of eligibility.

A second major problem seems to be a misunderstanding of the referee's
between termination for "just cause" by the employer and the true
requirements of the label "willful misconduct". Too many cases are
being denied without meeting the requirements of the full judicial
definition of the term "willful misconduct"

Of serious crisis development is that the Department of Unemployment
Compensation cuts off benefits immediately, upon the referee's
decision to reverse the eligible status, without giving any
consideration to the fact that the case has entered an appeal status
and the determination is not a final.

Next, the same department sends out a Repayment Due notice, in this
case it was assigned as a "no-fault" repay obligation for funds
already received. THE CLAIMANT MUST NOW ALSO REQUEST THE COURT TO
PERMIT RELIEF FROM THIS REPAYMENT OBLIGATION ON FUNDS SHE WAS ENTITLED
TO RECEIVE AND SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN CUT OFF FROM.

CLAIMANT MUST ALSO APPEAL TO THE COURT TO ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT
THIS CRISIS CREATED BY SO MANY ERRORS SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PERMITTED
TO REACH THIS POINT AND THE CLAIMANT IS REQUESTING RELEASE OF BENEFIT
CHECKS FOR EVERY WEEK SINCE CUT OFF ON MAY 11, 2004 UNTIL DECISION
DATE. AND THEREAFTER FOR AN UNLIMITED AMOUNT OF TIME, AS IT SHALL
TAKE, TO OBTAIN EMPLOYMENT AND RETAIN EMPLOYMENT, BECAUSE SHE WAS
ROBBED OF THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADJUST THROUGH THE TRANSITIONAL PERIOD
WITH THE AID OF UC BENEFITS AND ENDED UP INSTEAD ON THE OUTSIDE OF A
HUGE IRON CURTAIN THAT HAD NO EMPATHY OR SHAME FOR IT'S ABUSES.

But, these errors should be caught and corrected immediately by the
UCBR. Why are they passed through?

Why is the UCBR consistently violating Pa Code with endless
merry-go-round arguments that they will not re-open a case or consider
a remand because the claimant failed to attend a hearing? I have also
shown you that these arguments are now ceased forever. They are
inconsistent with the UC Law, Commonwealth Court Standards, Pa Code,
Federal Laws and Civil Rights. The constant defense that they write
their own policy and what violations, they are alledged to have
committed, are acceptable according to their policy, is unacceptable
to the higher authorities according to the higher Laws and
policies that they are obligated to be consistent with in their policymaking..

May I cite: VAN v. UCBR 508 PA 139, 494 A2D 1081 (1985):

"ALTHOUGH THE HEARINGS ARE INFORMAL, THEY INVOLVE SWORN TESTIMONY,
CROSS-EXAMINATION AND RECORDING OF THE PROCEEDINGS. AN ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNAL IS NOT BOUND BY ALL THE EVIDENTIARY AND PROCEDURAL RULES OF A
LAW COURT SO LONG AS CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HONORED, INCLUDING
THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DUE PROCESS OF LAW."

THIS MUST BE THE END OF POLICIES BEING MIS-INTERPRETED OR USED WITHOUT
FULL APPROVAL AND PROPER AMMENDMENT THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE HIGHER
RIGHTS AND STANDARDS AND LAWS PROTECTING THESE INDIVIDUALS THEY SERVE.











I thank you very much for a most enlightening experience. I have
learned much and hope to be able to use the expanded knowledge
productively, if I am unable to save my own life, perhaps my testimony
will inspire changes in the system that may save someone else's life.


You face an extremely serious responsibility of not only attempting to
have my funds released and delivered before it is too late, but to
initiate immediate changes in this predatory system that has knarled
its demon head above the values and honor, that our country and our
judicial system once held as it's identity and it's genuine character.






DAWN M. NARET'
Current Contact Info as of 2-23-07:
P.O.Box 2315 Pittsburgh, Pa 15230-2315
reply2dn@gmail.com
dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk

EXIBIT #3 ADDENDUM TO MOTION TO REMAND OR REVERSE


gynecomastia
EXIBIT #3 ADDENDUM TO MOTION TO REMAND OR REVERSE

**CONTACT DAWN NARET' AND LINK TO OTHER WEB SITES:**

MAIL: P.O. BOX 2315, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA
USA 15230-2315

EMAIL:
dnaret@gmail.com
Reply2dn@gmail.com
dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk

WEB SITES:
http://www.subatomicquantumhumor.blogspot.com "SUB ATOMIC QUANTUM HUMOR"
http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/ “WE THE PEOPLE”
http://www.chagrinning.blogspot.com/ “CHAGRINNING”
http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com/ “BUDDY, CAN YOU SPARE A LATTE ?”
http://www.dawnnaret.blog.com/ “58 YEAR OLD NATURAL-BORN LADY”


ADDENDUM TO:


MOTION TO REMAND OR REVERSE WITH PREJUDICE

CASE NO. 1742 CD 2004

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 10, 2004

APPENDED NOVEMBER 14, 2004

BY DAWN M. NARET', ATTORNEY FOR THE APPELLANT



On April 21, 2004, during the original hearing, the claimant called into the office with a question on directions and was told that the hearing had already started and she would not be able to attend. She requested a continuance of a few minutes until she could arrive and the denial was repeated that the hearing had already started and she would not be able to attend.

Within minutes, she called back, a second time and requested permission to at least drop-off a written testimony, with supporting documents of evidence, that she wished to present and have considered before a final decision.

This request was also denied and she was told that she would have an opportunity to present written testimony in an appeal to the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (UCBR), if the referee decided in favor of the employer.

I hold this interactive incident as further evidence of prejudice that has been unjustly obstructing the right to due process and a fair hearing, without prejudice, as required to be conducted by the UCBR.

May I repeat VANN v. UCBR 508 Pa 139, 494 A2d 1081 (1985):

"ALTHOUGH THE HEARINGS ARE INFORMAL, THEY INVOLVE SWORN TESTIMONY, CROSS-EXAMINATION AND RECORDING OF THE PROCEEDINGS. AN ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IS NOT BOUND BY ALL THE EVIDENTIARY AND PROCEDURAL RULES OF A LAW COURT, SO LONG AS CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HONORED, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DUE PROCESS OF LAW.





The claimant appeals to this honorable court to acknowledge, in their conclusion, that where opinions and policies have, on several occasions, agreed that if an employer is absent from the hearing, then the available record, which is usually the initial fact-finding plus the additional written testimony and material evidence, mailed in by the employer, as reasons why they are appealing an initial determination of eligibility, will be enough information in the record for the referee to evaluate and make a final decision, even in the absence of the employer.

The charge of prejudice lies in the acceptance of the additional written testimony, with any material evidence, that has been mailed-in and accepted into the record, in the absence of the employer, to be considered before a final decision by the referee.

If then, the employer has been given the opportunity to mail-in additional written testimony and material evidence, to be entered into the record before a final decision, even in his/her absence, then the same situation, from the aspect of the claimant, where the claimant is absent from the hearing, and the referee is permitted to conduct the hearing in their absence and determine a final decision based upon the available record, which includes the written testimony and material evidence mailed-in, by the employer, with their petition for an appeal, then the claimant, who is absent, is not being given the same opportunity for a fair hearing unless they are also afforded the same opportunity to deliver or mail-in written testimony as the employer did.

A final decision, where the employer was afforded the opportunity to add additional written testimony to the record and the claimant was denied or not offered the same opportunity, is a final decision formed with prejudice, and the claimant has not been offered the opportunity for a fair hearing.

Due process has then been violated if the final decision is made in the absence of the claimant and a continuance has been denied. Also, the employer was not obligated to prove "proper cause" for being absent, in order to have his/her written testimony accepted into the record prior to the final decision, and neither can the claimant be demanded to prove, "proper cause" for absence, before being afforded an opportunity for submitting a written testimony.

The absence of a claimant does not waive the right to due process and a Fair Hearing. Therefore, having a hearing scheduled, where they could not attend, was NOT giving them full opportunity for a fair hearing, if the opportunity for submission of written testimony, to be evaluated before a final decision has been made, has been denied.

The referee is obligated to decide these cases on their merit, according to the information available in the record. If that information is unjustly accepted from one party and not the other party, then the merit is not fairly determinable, if the referee is evaluating, with prejudice, the record of only one party.

The opportunity to submit written testimony cannot be denied to the claimant, if it is not denied to the employer. A final decision must include additional written testimony, of the claimant, if it accepts additional written testimony of the employer.

The initial fact-finding affords the employer an initial testimony written into the record. The employee is notified of the fact-finding comments, of the employer, in the initial determination letter from the Unemployment Compensation Department (UC Dept.).

The employee is NOT given an opportunity to cross-examine or rebutt any of these comments. If the UC Dept. determines that the employee is eligible for benefits, the employer is afforded the opportunity to appeal the determination and is given a SECOND opportunity in stating reasons why they seek appeal and to attach any material evidence they wish to have accepted into the record. The employee is not given an opportunity to cross-examine or rebutt any of these new comments either, until the hearing.

If the employee cannot attend the hearing, then there are TWO mailed-in written testimonies of the employer and NONE from the employee, to be evaluated according to merit. What is going to be evaluated? It is a ONE-SIDED, PREJUDICED EVALUATION PROCESS.

Now, if there is yet the attendance of the employer, with or without accompanying witnesses, giving oral testimony, objecting to the eligibility of benefits, in the absence of the employee, then the merit, of the record, now contains at least THREE and possibly more testimonies, if witnesses were present, from the employer and NONE from the employee.

In both situations, where the employer is absent or not absent, the record is unjustly tipped in favor of the employer and is obviously being evaluated with prejudice, if it is evaluated without at least ONE opportunity, for even ONE written testimony to be entered into the record, from the employee, in the event of their absence from the physical hearing. They clearly have NOT been afforded the opportunity of a fair hearing.

The obligatory evaluation, without prejudice, by the referee, before making a final decision, cannot be waived by the referee, by the claimant, by the employer or by the UCBR, who are also obligated to assure the opportunity for a fair hearing and order a continuance if there is any doubt that this was accomplished at the referee's hearing. A ONE-SIDED, PREJUDICED EVALUATION PROCESS is definitely cause to doubt that a fair hearing was indeed afforded.






It is a Constitutional Right to due process, without prejudice, and it is a Fundamental Right that the UCBR is obligated to be consistent with in their policymaking, according to, again I would like to reiterate: VAN V. UCBR 508 PA 139, 494 A2d 1081 (1985), "SO LONG AS CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HONORED, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DUE PROCESS OF LAW."

These Fundamental Rights, even in an informal UCBR setting, were already upheld by the Supreme Court in; DILLIPLAIN v. LEHIGH VLY. TRUST CO. 457 PA 255, 322 A2d 114 (1974). AND DILLIPLAIN WAS LATER SPECIFICALLY EXTENDED TO COVER UCBR PROCEEDINGS IN WING v. UCBR.

IN WING v. UCBR 496 PA 113, 436 A2d 179 (1981), the Supreme Court advised the UCBR to, "DISCARD THE DOCTRINE". The Supreme Court explained the rationale for "DISCARDING THE DOCTRINE", (the doctrine of Fundamental error) by noting; " THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW TRIBUNAL MUST BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT ITS ERRORS AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE; DILIGENT PREPARATION AND EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY, BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL, MUST BE ENCOURAGED BY REQUIRING THE PARTIES TO DEVELOPE COMPLETE RECORDS AND ADVANCE ALL LEGAL THEORIES AND THE FINALITY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL'S DETERMINATIONS MUST NOT BE ERODED BY TREATING EACH DETERMINATION AS A PART OF A SEQUENCE OF PIECEMEAL ADJUDICATIONS." – Id, @ 117, 436 A2d @ 181. "SUCH RATIONALE CONTINUES TO BE SOUND."

They are to make every effort to investigate thoroughly by NOT erroneously denying a continuance, but are instead to grant a continuance more readily in order to create a complete record, so that they can be, "GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO CORRECT ITS ERRORS AS EARLY AS POSSIBLE." How can they correct their errors, if they dismiss due process and send the unsatisfied party into a higher appeals arena, still trying to receive correction on a fundamental error made at the referee level? Or repeated at the UCBR level?

The SEQUENCUAL PIECEMEALING OF ADJUDICATIONS, is the error of forming a denial based on one issue, where a second issue forbids denial. This case has not been thoroughly investigated, assembled into a complete record or judicially resolved, whatsoever, and cannot avoid being remanded or reversed for violation of due process.






IE: A claimant, absent at a hearing, is denied a continuance and is claiming that there was not fair and equal opportunity to present equal testimony into the written record, which served as the basis for evaluating the merit according to available information. The UCBR upheld the referee's denial of benefits, stating that the claimant was absent and did not give "proper cause" for the absence and was already afforded the opportunity for a fair hearing. –ISSUE #1

IE: The same claimant, absent at the hearing where there is a charge of willful misconduct, and the employer did not satisfy the Burden of Proof, for willful misconduct. A continuance, affording further testimony and evidence are refused, because the claimant was absent and was already afforded the opportunity for a fair hearing, then the UCBR is repeating the error of the referee in forming a denial based on ONE issue where another issue, willful misconduct ISSUE #2, forbids denial.

They cannot deny benefits because a claimant was absent at a hearing. The absence is issue #one and absence is not an acceptable reason to deny benefits. The issue #TWO compounds the error, with the evidence that the employer never satisfied the Burden of Proof with testimony on the willful misconduct charge. This is a SECOND issue that forbids the denial of benefits "where the employer has not proven willful misconduct".

These are examples of exactly what the Supreme Court was referring to when it advised the UCBR to, "DISCARD THE DOCTRINE".

The UCBR did in fact attempt to violate the findings of the Supreme Court and present a, SEQUENCE OF PIECEMEAL ADJUDICATIONS, in denying on ISSUE #1 and neglecting on ISSUE #2. The UCBR neglected to consider the sworn testimony of the employer's witness, who under oath, denied that the reason for termination was willful misconduct.

The claimant was absent from the hearing, so a denial of benefits was upheld, by the UCBR, and the failure of the employer to prove willful misconduct was neglected and permitted to be buried below the absence issue even though it is forbidden to be present in a denial decision.

The Supreme Court already determined that these UCBR policies and procedures and dismissals and denials are violations of Fundamental Rights and advised that these doctrines be discarded in 1981.






Therefore, in every instance since 1981, where the UCBR has upheld a denial for benefits and has denied a request for continuance, due to the absence of a claimant, in a willful misconduct setting, even where the "Burden Of Proof" of willful misconduct, in the full definition as judicially defined, was not satisfied by the employer, they have been in violation of a Supreme Court decision and advisement, to void these policies (DISCARD THE DOCTRINE) THAT INHIBIT THE REQUIREMENT THAT THEY DEVELOP COMPLETE RECORDS AND ADVANCE ALL LEGAL THEORIES.


TO SUMMARIZE:

They CANNOT refuse a continuance due to absence from the original hearing,
They CANNOT refuse written testimony, from an absent party, to be accepted into the record, if they have accepted it from the opposing party, for evaluation before a final decision,
They CANNOT uphold an adverse decision, in a willful misconduct setting, where the "burden of proof" was not satisfied,
They CANNOT refuse or uphold a refusal for continuance, where an absent party has had NO opportunity to give ANY testimony, neither written or verbal,
They CANNOT repeatedly refuse to re-open cases or accept additional evidence, merely due to the objection of a re-opening, by the opponent, where the opponent's objection would be obstructing the right to due process if the objection is not over-ruled and the request is not granted.


These conclusions are NOT open for discussion or dispute. They have already BEEN decided by the SUPREME COURT.

Also, accepting that we cannot enable the possibility of blatant disregard of a Notice of Hearing, we must also consider that an absence, although entitled to present written testimony to be evaluated before a final decision, does already carry a consequence, in that the absent party is not able to witness the proceedings and is therefore, unable to cross-examine or rebut during the hearing.

They do not become aware of testimony presented unless they request transcripts and records of the hearing, which are to be made available with the absence of either party, in order to prepare an appeal, and they should be informed of this availability. If they have testimony and evidence to present, that would be relevant to the decision, they suffer a delay in the opportunity for rebuttal, but a continuance and that opportunity for rebuttal is required by Law.

Any policies proposed by the UCBR and approved as amendments to PA Codes and Statutes must meet the criteria test of consistency; that "CERTAIN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE HONORED, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING IN ACCORDANCE WITH DUE PROCESS OF LAW.".

Violation of this obligation is now verified by the Commonwealth Court and the supremacy of its opinion over the policies of the UCBR, plus the support of those just opinions by the Supreme Court, will nullify the standing, credibility and acceptance of these policies, as arguments that would DISREGARD the decision by the Supreme Court, if they do not pass the criteria test of consistency to Basic and Fundamental rights, as already demanded and clarified by the Supreme Court, and now I must request that it also be supported, reiterated and upheld by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. (end of addendum)

AUTHOR: DAWN NARET'

2-28-07 author update: Current Contact Info:

Dawn Naret'

P.O.Box 2315, Pittsburgh, Pa. 15230-2315

Email: reply2dn@gmail.com OR dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk

Blogsites: http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com

http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com

EXIBIT #4 NUMBERED OPPOSITION TO UCBR'S MOTION TO DISMISS


gynecomastia


NARET' V. UCBR (2004) DOCKET NO. 1742 CD 2004







11/29/04 REPLY FROM APPELLANT TO:

11/24/04 RESPONSE FROM UCBR TO PETITIONER'S 11/8/04 MOTION TO REMAND OR REVERSE WITH PREJUDICE




AND




OPPOSITION TO: 11/24/04 MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONER'S APPEAL FILED BY UCBR












APPELLANT IS FILING AN AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION TO THE 11/24/04 MOTION, BY UCBR, TO DISMISS PETITIONER'S APPEAL







APPEAL TO:




COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CASE DOCKET NO. 1742 CD 2004




DAWN NARET', ATTORNEY, PRO SE,

APPELLANT




VS.




UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, RESPONDENT













NARET' V. UCBR (2004) NO. 1742 CD 2004 (CONT'D)







APPELLANT, DAWN NARET', ATTORNEY PRO SE, FILES THIS

OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONER'S APPEAL FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:




(The reply number will correspond to the response line it is replying to as much as possible)




1. The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (hereafter referred to as the UCBR) filed this 11/24/04 Motion to Dismiss as a response to the 11/8/04 9 page Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice and 7page Addendum, filed by the appellant (petitioner). The arguments and legal citings in the appellant's combined 16 page Motion, with its Addendum, presented undebatable evidence that conduct and procedure were repeatedly in error in this case, since the initial filing of an appeal against the decision of eligibility, made by the Department of Unemployment Compensation. Their initial, correct decision was based on the fact that the employer denied willful misconduct on the initial fact-finding inquiry and repeated that denial, in the dialog of the transcripts, as specified in the appellants Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice/plus Addendum. They were essentially appealing the initial employer's own testimony or to clarify, disputing with themselves, which once testified, cannot be revoked or appealed by the party that testified, and definitely should not be given a scheduled appeal hearing date, because that would unacceptably inflate the hearings calendar.










2. On July 21, 2004, the UCBR defaulted procedure by adopting the illegal decision, by the referee. It is illegal to deny UC Benefits, where the employer failed to prove willful misconduct, and clearly stated, in the transcripts, that the ALLEGED offense was a Category II, which is the "LESS SERIOUS" Category.

3. On October 8, appellant met the timely deadline of October 12, 2004, for filing brief, in spite of the UCBR's failure to respond with a timely submittal of all hearing records. Brief was hand-written.

4. On October 12, 2004, the prothonotary's office rejected the brief, for form, and set a new deadline of November 12, 2004. Appellant made every effort to encourage expedition of the forwarding of requested records but had only a portion of them forwarded on October 26, 2004, through the kind intervention of Gerard Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Counsel for the UCBR. On November 3, 2003, a 4 th written request demanding the complete record, including " documents #1 through #31", that were mentioned on page 2 of the transcripts. None of the documents were forwarded even to date. Appellant then had no alternative but to file a timely 9page Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice plus a 7 page Addendum to the Motion on November 8, 2004, due to lack of UCBR'S cooperation in forwarding all records. This also nullified the new deadline of November 12, 2004 for filing a brief, according to the FEDERAL Rules of Appellate Procedure on Motion to Remand: "The motion shall be filed prior to the filing of the appellant's brief." - Rule 23B Section (A) paragraph 2. And may I also cite Rule 23B Section (D), "Oral argument and the deadline for brief shall be VACATED upon the filing of a Motion to Remand under this rule.".




It has frequently become apparent that the UCBR operates under a misconception of the extent of their own autonomy, in policymaking, as well as policy following, that has often revealed them to be non-compliant to the superior policies and authorities of the laws, policies and procedures of the Commonwealth Court, The UC Laws and the Federal Superior Court Procedures, THAT THEY ARE ALSO SUBORDINATE TO, in their UPWARD ASSIGNING OF APPELLANT DISPUTES. These higher authorities cannot and will not abide by the non-compliant policymaking practices of the UCBR, WHERE DUE PROCESS WOULD BE VIOLATED IF NON-COMPLIANT UCBR POLICIES WERE PERMITTED TO OVER-RIDE THE HIGHER AUTHORITIES THAT HOLD SUPREMANCY OVER THEIR DEPARTMENT.

5. The UCBR, on Item #5 of their Motion to dismiss, incorrectly implies that the appellant has not complied with proper requirements of Chapter 21 of the Pa Rules of Appellate Procedure. The fact is, the appellant was exactly correct in timely functions and form, and the UCBR has attempted to persuade this court to overlook the filing of the combined 16 page Motion to Reverse, with all of its defaults documented, and its vacating of the brief deadline.






















Therefore it is the UCBR who is not complying, due to their inappropriate filing for a Motion to Dismiss the Petitioner's Appeal instead of complying with the procedure of response to the Motion to Remand;

"A response shall be filed within 20 days after the motion is filed. The response shall include a proposed order of remand that identifies the ineffectiveness claims and specifies the factual issues relevant to EACH such claim to be addressed by the trial court in the event Remand is granted, unless the responding party accepts that proposed by the moving party. Any reply shall be filed within 10 days after the response is filed." – Rule 23B Section (B) Paragraph 2.




6. UCBR: " On October 25, 2004, Petitioner requested the Board forward the hearing transcript of the employer's testimony from the hearing of April 21, 2004."

REPLY: Prior to the July 21, 2004 decision, by the UCBR, a telephone request for records was made. On July 29, 2004 a written request for ALL RECORDS was delivered and no response was received. By the deadline of October 12, 2004, Brief had to be submitted and compiled without the full record of the hearing, which was imperative to its efficient completion. This is a serious default, as cited, with references, in the Appellants Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice/ Plus Addendum. On October 25, 2004, Appellant submitted the THIRD not FIRST request for all records.













7. On October 26, 2004, a prompt response was made to the third request by, Gerard Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Counsel, as stated in reply item #4 of this document, but he only forwarded a copy of the transcript and 1 exhibit of the employer (the only exhibit of the employer, according to the transcript.) On page 2 of the transcript was dialog referring to documents #1 through #31 being entered into the record. Discussion of this was expanded in the appellants Motion to Reverse. None of these documents were ever forwarded and they held significance because they were already present, in the file, before the employer arrived and were not delivered by her, quoted from or mentioned by her during her testimony, as evidenced in the transcripts.

On November 3, 2004 a FOURTH request was submitted to the UCBR, with a time is of the essence status, pending the November 12, 2004 deadline for brief. NONE was received. UCBR DEFAULTED, again, in neglecting to make a timely response to requests for ALL RECORDS.

8. UCBR: "ON or about November 12, 2004, Petitioner filed a Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice (Motion) with this court, purportedly requesting a remand or reversal due to lack of timely release of records that are imperative to the preparation of her brief."

REPLY: The FACT is; on November 8, 2004, NOT November 12, 2004, appellant had still received NO RESPONSE to the FOURTH request for ALL RECORDS. This was not a "purported" default but a serious obstruction to the efficient preparation of brief. The absence of a timely response, for the forwarding of the required documents, prompted the November 8, 2004, filing of the 9 page Motion of Remand or Reversal with Prejudice.

On November 10, 2004, appellant also filed a 7 page Addendum to that motion, providing a combined total of a 16 page Motion that revealed a wider view of the tragedy and proportionate number of victims that are being made homeless and losing entire households of possessions and property, due to these procedural spans, defaults and delays. If appeals are not resolved and UC Funds delivered to the claimants within 30 days, the claimant is vulnerable to an eviction on rental property, and if not resolved and delivered within 90 days, to a home-owner, they are facing mortgage foreclosure.

The staff of UCBR, as well as this honorable court must open their eyes; to the massive crisis the UCBR is creating by erroneously and illegally denying UC Benefits. By the UCBR'S own admission, they deny 100 to 200 appeals PER DAY.

That's 24,000 to 48,000 victims PER YEAR, that they are responsible for, by imposing on them, the vulnerability of having their only source of income cut off and becoming homeless!

The UCBR has not been complying with the purpose it was created for. It is responsible to; investigate, correct and resolve errors as quickly as possible by using all the non-prejudice evaluating processes, that are fair and just and legal according to all Federal Civil Rights Laws, Pa State Laws, UC Department Laws, and UCBR Tribunal policies, that are recognized as acceptable within their own department, as well as beyond themselves, to the superior authorities, that they are also obligated to be compliant with, in their policymaking and practices.









The referees are over-burdened with appeals from employers who are hiring profit service-contract companies to appeal EVERY single ELIGIBLE Determination. These companies MUST be removed from the arena, as they have no association as legal counsel or acceptable witnesses who can present testimony or evidence. I expounded on this, in more detail, in the Motion to Reverse. I sympathize with the staff of the UC Department, including the referees and the Tribunal. But the over-load they are burdened with, they have created themselves, by giving hearing scheduling to frivolous appeals that are being made, in order that the employer can avoid payment as required, to the State UC Fund. These problems cannot be resolved by prejudicing the claimants, by denying benefits, where no willful misconduct has been claimed by the employer in the initial fact-finding inquiry, just to expedite the over-load of cases out the door, where it was not the fault of the claimant that they were over-loaded and where the staff from the UC Department already determined them as ELIGIBLE. Why would they schedule a hearing for an appeal where the employer already denied willful misconduct in the initial fact-finding inquiry? They shoot themselves in the foot and create the over-load by permitting the unpermittable. The employer cannot waste the referee's time or put the UC Benefits of the claimant in question for the purpose of appealing his own initial testimony.

If the UCBR developed non-prejudice policies and procedure, supervised and followed-up on the decisions of the referees, the caseload of error, coming to them, would be drastically reduced, just by having the referee abide by the non-prejudice policies that must conform to the right of due process and the right to a fair hearing.

Their reluctance to grant continuances, to avail claimants the fair opportunity to completely voice all their testimony and present evidence, is causing the incompleteness that results in upward assigning and continuance, where the claimants are not receiving due process from the referee decisions. They CANNOT refuse continuances to claimants because too many employers have jammed their calendar with frivolous appeals. They pacify the request of the employer but not the claimant. This is clearly prejudice. They are devaluating the claimant and minimalizing the importance of their Civil Rights, their Right to a Fair Hearing and the importance and relevance of their testimony.

10. UCBR: (these statements are a perfect example, of the practice, of shoving the priorities and defaults under the rug and attempting to slide the testimony, of the claimant, out the door before anyone chances to hear or pay attention to them) Quote item # 10 in portions; " To the extent the court considers Petitioner's Motion and Addendum to be her amended Brief, these lack a statement of the scope of review and standard of review, statement of the questions involved, summary of argument, argument and conclusion…. Wherefore , Petitioner, having failed to comply with this court's order, dated October 12, 2004, to file an amended Brief…… and the petitioner's Motion and Addendum being non-responsive ….(???)…..Respondent moves that your honorable Court dismiss Petitioner's appeal…..Wherefore, petitioner, having failed to state grounds upon which relief can be granted……. (???)….and Respondent, having complied with the Petitioner's request for a copy of the referee's hearing transcripts of April 21, 2004, Respondent moves that your honorable Court deny Petitioner's Motion and Addendum…..".

REPLY: the UCBR has clearly resorted to false statements, incorrect information and non-compliance with procedure. Also, in the attempt to over-step and erase the defaults proven in the appellant's Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice/ plus Addendum, Respondent has failed to give any viable explaination or retort to several documented issues, including the employers initial fact-finding statements and their transcribed hearing testimony, that willful misconduct was NOT the reason for termination, the missing 34 page letter of request for reconsideration that was not appended to the record and possibly more missing material of testimony, presented by the appellant, or they would not consider that these blatent false statements could be found believable if ALL the evidence and testimony are available for evaluation. "Wherefore, Petitioner, having failed to state grounds upon which relief can be granted….." Where are the pages listing all this material if this Respondent believes they have not been presented? It is obviously a rouse to avoid admitting that serious mistakes were made and Immediate Reversal of their Illegal Decisions can be the only recourse possible for this Honorable Court to proceed with, having in its philosophies founded on a more ethical standard of practices than these being resorted to by the Respondent. Therefore, the Appellant moves that this honorable and ethical Court deny the Respondents Motion to Dismiss the Petitioner's Appeal, and further moves that the Appellant be granted an immediate reversal of all decisions that denied UC Benefits with prejudice.













In conclusion, UCBR counsel, having the disadvantage of arriving late in these proceedings, and to be liberal, may not have been privy to the entire record of testimony and the chronology of evidence presented by the Appellant, is unfortunately lacking an awareness and insight of the urgency of the need for immediate Reversal and disbursement of UC Funds to legally ELIGIBLE claimants. Please review the list of 17 personal tragedies that are suffered within 30 days of a referee's denial, listed on page 6 of the Appellants Motion to Reverse.

This is not a time to "save face", but an opportunity to "man up" and admit honorably that errors have been discovered, many victims have been left homeless, many lives are being destroyed by these merry-go-round delay tactics and policies. Yes, the claimants do eventually go away and leave you alone. They are forced to leave the state, those who survive alive. But these were never the stereotypical images you are holding of hoboes who are too lazy to work. These are people who have worked hard all their lives. Some have degrees, own their own homes and serve on community boards. These are people who were employed full-time, very recently. But in an alarming number of cases, they have been unjustly severed from the workplace through a common practice of deception, slander and framing innocent employees in order to dishonestly lay the groundwork for false statements of "just cause" for termination in order that the employer might avoid UC Benefits payments. These are people who have even been more adept and efficient at doing their job than their supervisors and were viewed as a threat. Therefore the groundwork is laid down to get rid of them "with just cause".

They never deserved to loose their jobs, and now you impose on them homelessness, starvation, banishment and possibly death.

Read my lips. A State, a city, a country cannot survive the budgets required when there are no citizens paying taxes or having consumable income. Everyone and everything is affected by negative, unethical, uncaring, uncompromising policies and practices that would obstruct consumable incomes to the citizens. These are good people being abused.







Please STOP THE ABUSE.







Thank you,

Dawn Naret'

Current Contact Info:

P.O. Box 2315 Pittsburgh, Pa 15230-2315

reply2dn@gmail.com

dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk



(Old Original Contact Info-see below):

Dawn Naret'

P.O. Box 643

Lancaster, Pa. 17608 (no phone anymore – dependant on free Library computer access)

dawn_naret@emailaccount.com

dawn_naret@yahoo.com

EXIBIT #5 LETTERS TO PA STATE ATTY MACAREVICH AND PROTHONOTARY


gynecomastia


LETTER TO MACAREVICH, ATTY FOR PA STATE:

Dawn M. Naret’
P.O. Box 643
Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17608
(717) 394-2171


Gerard Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Counsel
Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
10th floor Labor and Industry Bldg.
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120

November 14, 2004


Deputy Mackarevich,

On October 25, 2004, I sent a repeat request for records on case no. 1742 CD 2004. You very kindly and very promptly intervened and responded to that request in the absence of Clifford Blaze, Esquire, but you did not send me ALL the records.

Unfortunately, I have reached an end of available waiting time and have submitted a Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice (you’re welcome J) to the Commonwealth Court of Pa, on November 10, 2004.

I also attempted to send you a copy of the correspondence, for Certificate of Service, since I have not been informed of exactly whom, if not yourself, is assuming full duties of the absent Attorney Blaze.

The mailing was returned to me, with refusal to forward it to you. I then faxed it to your fax number listed on your letterhead.

Today, I am mailing you a copy of an Addendum to that Motion. I chose to expand on some dialog.

Again, I thank you, very much, for your intervention and assistance in bringing this case to a long over-due completion.




Regards,



Dawn M. Naret’




LETTER TO PROTHONOTARY:

Dawn Naret’, Attorney, Pro Se
P.O. Box 643
Lancaster, Pa 17608-0643

Commonwealth Court of Pa.
Office of the Prothonotary
Irvis Office Bldg. – Rm. 624
Harrisburg, Pa 17120

Atten: Mr. Daniel R. Schuckers, Esquire
Regarding: Appellants 11/8/04 Motion to Remand or reverse with Prejudice and 11/10/04 Addendum to be appended to that Motion.

CASE: Dawn Naret’ v. UCBR
No. 1742 CD 2004

11/29/04

Dear Mr. Schuckers,

I was awaiting a response, from the UCBR office, within the required 20 days, to the Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice, filed by me 11/8/04, (prior to the 11/12/04 dead-line for brief submission).

What I received is a partial response to only a few items of contention that prompted the Motion. I can only be liberal to the UCBR and assume that they have given a timely response to that Motion with their 11/24/04 communication, stated in the form of a request for Motion to Dismiss the Appeal of the Petitioner. (???)

It is an unusual response, considering the evidence presented in the Motion to Remand or Reverse with Prejudice/plus Addendum. I am very certain that a dismissal would be, without a doubt, a very serious violation of all laws, codes and procedures that they are obligated to comply with.

Their denial of Due Process was one of the contentious issues and the illegal denial of benefits, where willful misconduct was not proven or stated by the employer, relegate this case beyond the possibility of legal dismissal.

Therefore, I am submitting an OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS PETITIONER’S APPEAL and also requesting that the justification of this opposition be summarized in my permissible REPLY TO THEIR RESPONSE, as I am submitting it within the required 10 days and I am willing, as I said, to be liberal as to the venue of their 11/24/04 communication.


I hold no negative opinions toward any of the staff currently focusing on this case. I am fully aware of the difficulties they have encountered with staff replacements and various other cogs in the wheel.

I consider myself fortunate that Mr. Gerard Mackarevich, Deputy Chief Counsel and Ms. Janet M. Tarczy, Assistant Counsel, should have been willing to come in on this problem situation at such a late date.

I have addressed the Certificate of Service to both or either Mr. Mackarevich or Ms. Tarczy, since I have not been told whom to consider the official replacement of Attorney Clifford Blaze, who left in August 2004.

There has been, repeated lack of communication as well as misinformation that created an unfair tragedy including now; eviction and homelessness, due to the illegal withholding of UC benefit funds.

Because of the situation advancing to such an intensely serious miscarriage of justice, I must beg your compassion and assistance in expediting the reversal and release of UC funds immediately. I have no phone either, and cannot continue to accomplish these necessary clerical communications and requirements.

It is not an incompetence on my part, it is an injustice that I should be required to suffer through so much difficulty to receive what I am already entitled to and was already approved for, before the referee erred in her judgment and knowledge of the UC Law.

I can be contacted by e-mail at:

Dawn_naret@emailaccount.com or
Dawn_naret@yahoo.com



Thank you and regards,




Dawn Naret’
P.O. Box 643
Lancaster, Pa 17608

(No phone no.)

Monday, June 25, 2007

OPEN LETTER TO STAFF OF "SMOKE-FREE AMERICA", WITH RESPONSE FROM SENATOR JAY COSTA, REGARDING PA STATE SMOKING BAN


gynecomastia


OPEN LETTER TO STAFF AND PROMOTERS OF "SMOKE-FREE AMERICA", REGARDING PENNSYLVANIA STATE - WIDE SMOKING BAN, WITH COMMENT FROM SENATOR JAY COSTA.

JUNE 25,2007

BELOW IS A RESPONSE I RECEIVED FROM SENATOR COSTA, IN RESPONSE TO MY REQUEST THAT HE MOVE TO RESTRICT DANGEROUS ADDITIVES FROM BEING ADDED TO THE TOBACCO IN THE PROCESSING OF NON-DANGEROUS ORGANIC TOBACCO PRODUCTS.

Please redirect YOUR efforts from brow beating and discriminating against smokers, to protecting EVERYONE"S rights;

To purchase and consume legal products without censorship
OR discrimination
OR being criminalized
OR having our children snatched, from our home, because the parents dare to smoke in privacy.

This movement has been INSANE............ TO SAY THE LEAST,
AND THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR AN EXCUSE TO;
ERASE OUR FREEDOM,ERASE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS,ERASE OUR DEMOCRACY,
AND SABOTAGE OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT AND LOYALITY TO OUR COUNTRY, ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE OUTRAGEOUS PERSECUTIONS AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL DANGERS YOU ARE PROMOTING WITH YOUR CURRENT EFFORTS FOR A SMOKE-FREE AMERICA.

I ADVISE YOU TO REDIRECT YOUR FOCUS TO:
FREEDOM, PROTECTION OF EVERYONE'S RIGHTSAND PROTECTION OF EVERYONE'S HEALTH.

PLEASE PROMOTE A COMMUNIST-FREE AMERICA !!! You don't throw smokers out in the cold and you don't try to criminalize their reputation OR steal their children.

Smoking is only ONE excuse, the enemies of freedom are using to erase democracy. The next one could be an area that you are personally associated with, and see absolutely NO reason why they should be banishing , criminalizing and threatening to arrest you or take your children away from you.........But this is the planned and active agenda of the enemies of Democracy.

You WILL be just as much VICTIMIZED, as smokers are today, if you do not join your fellow citizens, especially those who smoke, and demand protection of ALL OUR Constitutional rights.

Working WITH you, for a safer America,Dawn Naret'


Forwarded ConversationSubject: Re: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PROTECTION PATH ------------------------
From: PA Senator Jay Costa <costa@pasenate.com> To: reply2dn@gmail.comDate: Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 2:52 PM
Dear Ms. Naret:
Thank you for contacting me to relate your thoughts regarding cigarettes and the current effort to ban smoking in public places in Pennsylvania. I appreciate your interest in seeing cigarettes made without additives so that they would be less addictive and more healthful for all who encounter them. I regret, however, that the Commonwealth does not have the power to regulate the contents of cigarettes. Regulating products that are traded in interstate commerce, as cigarettes are, is the exclusive purview of the federal government. I encourage you to contact those who represent you in the U.S. Congress to relate your thoughts on this issue to them, since they are in a better position to address your concerns.
Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me about this issue. Please feel free to contact me if I can assist you in any way.
Sincerely yours,Senator Jay Costa, Jr.43rd DistrictJC/ jlg

Saturday, June 09, 2007

CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS MUST BE EQUALLY PROTECTED


gynecomastia


LETTER TO TOBACCO-FREE AMERICA LOBBYISTS:

date : Jun 5, 2007 5:11 PM

subject : Constitutional Rights Must Be Equal

Hello,

I am once again enjoining you, in the effort to eliminate the health dangers of cigarette additives in our environment. In the course of this effort, your organization has done an impressive job of organizing a national campaign, including youth volunteers.

As admirable as I consider this accomplishment, I am still disappointed in your violations and abuses, being dolled out to smoking citizens, as a result of your total disregard of the equal constitutional rights owned by smokers as well as non-smokers.

We cannot honorably, be teaching youths to steam-roll their preferences through the legislative process when those preferences are violating the constitutional rights of others.

I am enclosing a sample of lobbying to State Senators, that I have been busy on, for the purpose of taking this bannishment and punishment program off the backs of the smokers and placing the focus and accountability onto the manufacturers where it should have been to begin with. For some FACT FINDING INFORMATION, that you can use in your anti-manufacturing additives campain, I will include also, a letter to the Allegheny County Executive Director that tried to help him avoid embarrassment before the State Of Pa BANNED his attempt to write smoking bans into county legislation.

You cannot continue to campaign for smoke-FREE environments, buildings, workplaces, businesses, sidewalks, streets and now private cars ( ?!!! ) when smokers have equal rights to engage in smoking in ALL these places, if they so choose and prefer.

The solution to non-smokers wanting protection should NEVER have been to banish smokers from society. This was an outrage that you will oneday regret. Whether you supported the actions in your political career or policies or whether you supported it with local smoke-free ordinances and laws.

The solution, should have been, from the beginning, justly placed to PROTECT the health and rights of ALL citizens and not just the health and rights of non-smokers. How much danger did you place THEIR health in by booting them out in the street, discriminating against them in housing or discriminating against them in employment?

How many lost their jobs, lost their income, became homeless or suffered health damage from exposure to inclimate weather and back of the building trash area environments while eating their lunch next to the trash dumpster? These results are despicable!!

Such attitudes and actions are a violation of the constitutional rights of smokers. They place the smoker on a level even below that of a porno shop, because the porno shop is protected to exist there, as they choose, according to their constitutional rights.

But the smokers, who probably abhore the thought of their presence in the neighborhood, just as much as anyone else, find THEMSELVES kicked out or prejudiced against, more than the porno shop owner, just because they choose to smoke healthy tobacco that, over-the-years, has been contaminated with chemicals that did not used to be in there.

You are OBLIGATED NOW, to regret those horrible prejudice attitudes and demands that you promoted, supported and steam-rolled through legislation, which caused personal, career, economical and residentual discriminations and injury, including health injuries from pneumonia, stress and inclimate weather exposure, to smokers, while being bannished outside buildings, while you sat comfortably, and warmly inside enjoying the protection to your health. SHAME ON YOU ?!!! You showed NO equal rights consideration, and it will haunt you, on record, to cast up record of your ugly head of "PREJUDICE ATTITUDE" one day in your career.

I want you and your organization to join the band-wagon to move this issue into the relevant areana of pressing for manufacturing fines and prohibitions of tobacco additives and off the backs smoking citizens. And I want you to apologize to the smokers for your TOTAL disregard for their equal rights and equal protection and reverse ALL legislative bans and demands against their freedom to choose to smoke ANYWHERE AND ANYTIME they choose.

You are an embarrassment to the democratic process with your original campaign direction. Make the apologies, erase the requests for bans and bannishments and save your reputations as "DESTROYERS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS".

No one will vote for a "COMMUNIST OR SOCIALIST DESTROYER OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS".


LETTER TO REPORT SITUATIONS TO SENATOR J. ORIE:

May 23, 2007

Dear Senator Orie,

I am very impressed with the organizing you have accomplished with your smoke-free lobbying. I agree that we all must make a great effort to end these health hazards for everyone. I would like to join you in a collaborative effort. Now that we have enormous attention and focus of the string-pullers on the issue, we must bring the lobbying into the core of the theater (of war) the toughest arena of all and begin, with your expert ability of discreet brain-seeding and thought path manipulation, to zero in on the source of the hazard.

That, of course, would be the cigarette manufacturers. We must eliminate their freedom to produce and distribute a health hazard product. We must lobby to create laws that prohibit, COMPLETELY, their freedom to process chemicals and additives into tobacco products altogether. We must give them NO ALTERNATIVE but to produce healthy organic products that will endanger no one's health. Studies have already proven that natural tobacco is not even addictive, let alone cancerous. It only contains a trace of nicotine, that is why, in my opinion, they add the chemicals, is to PRODUCE addiction. It does not occur naturally.

The tobacco plant, of itself, is not a toxic, addictive or poisonous plant. It is a natural, God created, domestic, green vegetation, ranking it the same as basil, parsley and oregano. Grasshoppers eat the leaves as the mainstay of their diet, including the nicotine. The natural nicotine is actually of such a low level it is not even addictive to many humans or grasshoppers.

It is these chemicals that are dangerous to the health of organic, mammal humans, not the tobacco leaf.

Why then, are the manufacturers not properly addressing the problem, of health concerns, by eliminating the chemical additives and offering a clean, safe, organic product?


How many millions of dollars, a year, would they have already saved in law-suits?
How much of their profit could they have saved, on the overhead cost, of the chemicals?
How many customers could they have kept, if the product was not labeled a health risk?
How many new customers might be obtained, if the product were safe and even shown to have health benefits, when uncontaminated with chemicals?

All of God's green creations contain health benefits. Even those thought to be dangerous. Doctors now prescribe a green plant named cannabis, A.K.A marijuana, for over a dozen different ailments. At the turn of the century, circa. 1890, Doctors also used to prescribe cocaine for calming the nerves. It is also a natural plant.

When I was a private nurse for Miss Helen Clay Frick, Pittsburgh , Pa , The family never threw anything away. Among the bathroom medicine cabinet items was a leather pouch, of glass medicine vials, prepared by the family physician as an assortment of "might need remedies" while the family was on cruise to Europe and could not be treated by their private physician. Among the vials was one, full of white powder, labeled "cocaine - 1898". Natural plants were always legal and accepted for medical treatment.

Cigarettes have been reported to ease, and in some cases, to stop the low to moderate chemical and or gas vapor induced lung and cardiac spasms. These spasms could cause instant death; in emphysema, asthma, C.O.P.D., CHF and cardiac arrhythmia patients.
I would like to see more research done on this, because I am convinced that the organic tissue, violently rejecting a chemical or gas vapor invasion, would be soothed by the counter-induction of organic vapor.

The positive, expandable components, of the organic, super ceding the densifying and contracting physics of the negative. But this is only my personal, scientific theory of how cigarettes could actually be serviceable, as a health benefit, if left untampered with.

If we could all do an honest facts reality check and stop the false information, and terroristic rhetoric, the smokers would be healthier, The non-smokers would be safe and secure from any paranoia of being around smokers or cigarettes, and the manufacturers would be free of law suits and diminishing market share profit percentages.

That would be the wisest solution for the satisfaction of everyone. And it would end the discrimination and dangers of paranoia.

There might be one unhappy camper left, and that would be the chemical manufacturers and pharmaceuticals sales to sick patients, but ….they created the additives, the harmful to humans insecticides, disinfectants, solvents, etc…etc…etc.

To that, the wise old sage, "KhanDawnUs" say; "the dog who bites….could end up with bloody tail."

I would hope that they would redirect their focus to preventative health enhancement, by producing safer protective products.

I personally wish to promote good health, extended life and the pursuit of happiness to every human. Lets all do a fact finding reality check and no one has to fear being banished 15 feet from the building.

We must erase the errors, committed against not only smokers, but against all humans and put an END to the violations of everyone's constitutional; civil, and human rights, before they are a lost and obsolete memory of Democracy.

Thank you for smoking or not smoking...it is your right to choose.,

Dawn Naret',
Author of "We The People" Web-site, http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/

Dawn Naret'
P.O. Box 2315
Pittsburgh , PA 15230-2315

WEB SITES:
http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/,
http://www.dawnnaret.blog.com/
http://www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com/
http://www.dawnnaret.workpad.com


EMAIL:
text.reply2dn@gmail.com,
reply2dn@gmail.com
dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk


response from: "Orie, Senator Jane" jorie@pasen.gov>


date: May 23, 2007 1:22 PM


subject: RE: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PATH PROTECTOR


mailed-by: pasen.gov


"I definitely will look into-------and will have Kurt contact you to discuss further! "



Friday, April 06, 2007

Open Letter To Dan Onorato -

(TO VIEW ADDITIONAL ARTICLES, CONTINUE TO SCROLL DOWN)

Dawn Naret'
P.O. Box 2315
Pittsburgh, Pa 15230-2315
4-5-07
Dan Onorato, County Executive Director

I tried to forward you a copy of a very important article, but this contact system would not accept the size of it. Please read my copy of it A.S.A.P. at:http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/

This is not a typical letter to the Executive Director of County Government. It is being sent to you, for your protection.

There is about to arrive, a stirring of angry demonstrations and revolts against violations of Constitutional Rights and discriminations against smokers. It would be beneficial to you and your staff to read this very informative article and familiarize yourself with all of the valuable information, that could help you have clear confidence, to support smokers in the "Burn the Smoking Ban" conflict.

I realize that you could feel more obligation to support the preferences, of what you imagine, to be the majority of the constituent opinion. However, the majority often has cross-over voters, as you are aware.If you are not able to influence the County "steam-rollers" to cease discrimination and abuse, and to get these illegal laws and policies completely off the books, in Pittsburgh City and County, you could very well witness a prime example of "Majority Leverage" going bad.

You are possibly not aware of just how illegal and discriminatory this new ban is and every rule or policy that tries to dictate the activity and choice of a consumer who is using a legal product, is an illegal policy. And just as illegal and discriminatory is the on-going practice of loading unassociated taxes onto tobacco products, "where smokers have to pay to provide increased funding, but non-smokers do not contribute".

I guarantee you, that 100% of the smoking voters will turn on any politician who supports the continuance of these abusive dictates and practices. Their numbers may be considered the minority, but the non-smoking majority may not approve of everything on your record, and could be crossing-over to the smokers' side, at least on a general election debate.

So, you cannot have a guarantee that their majority over smokers is a clear sailing majority acceptance of the ban and the continued abuses against the smokers.

A more appropriate and definitely more legal philosophy and policy toward non-smokers demands, would be the "if you don't like it leave..." practice, advised for theaters of "XXX" rated film rights and porn shops in unwelcoming neighborhoods. How have these unsavory businesses survived?? Remember? it was because of their Constitutional Right to choose and exist. Are we expected to have any LESS democratic democracy protection extended to honorable, working, citizens, who just happen to smoke cigarettes, a legal product to consume?

The Honorable Judge, requires that you contact him and officially withdraw requests for dictatorial smoking bans, limitations, restrictions, prohibiting/monitoring policies, laws, rules, discriminations, prejudices, as well as; harassment and obstruction practices, within your offices and illegal housing and employment discrimination being encouraged, by your office, based on erroneous assumption of freedom to permit, conduct or support these violations of constitutional rights of smokers.

Regards,Dawn Naret'